Neurodiversity in South African Education. A Study of Policy and Research on Autism and Attention-Deficient/Hyper-Activity Disorder

IF 3.5 1区 社会学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Moleli Nthibeli, Dominic Griffiths, Tanya Bekker
{"title":"Neurodiversity in South African Education. A Study of Policy and Research on Autism and Attention-Deficient/Hyper-Activity Disorder","authors":"Moleli Nthibeli,&nbsp;Dominic Griffiths,&nbsp;Tanya Bekker","doi":"10.1111/josi.70031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This conceptual paper advocates for the recognition of neurodiversity within South African education policy as integral to the realization of inclusive education. Current policy discourses marginalize neurodivergent communities by conflating neurodiversity with disability, reproducing deficit-based framings that neglect intersectional realities. This underrepresentation has negative consequences for the participation and recognition of neurodivergent learners, particularly those with autism and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. We argue that policy reform is essential to reframe neurodiversity as difference, rather than disability. Drawing on the cultural model and intersectionality theory, this study undertakes a qualitative analysis of post-apartheid education policy documents and relevant scholarly literature. The analysis critically interrogates how neurodiversity is framed, the extent of its representation, and the implications of prevailing deficit-oriented conceptualizations for inclusive education in South Africa. Findings reveal that neurodiversity is largely absent from existing policies, and when referenced, it is mischaracterized through medicalized discourses that reinforce stigma. Such framings erase strengths-based perspectives, perpetuate negative perceptions of autism and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and constrain institutional capacity to develop inclusive practices responsive to South Africa's sociocultural context. We call for Afrocentric, intersectional, and community-driven policy reform. Reframing neurodiversity as human diversity would align with UNESCO's Salamanca Statement, enhance institutional inclusivity, and improve the educational experiences of neurodivergent learners across schools and universities in South Africa.</p>","PeriodicalId":17008,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Issues","volume":"81 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://spssi.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/josi.70031","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Issues","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/josi.70031","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This conceptual paper advocates for the recognition of neurodiversity within South African education policy as integral to the realization of inclusive education. Current policy discourses marginalize neurodivergent communities by conflating neurodiversity with disability, reproducing deficit-based framings that neglect intersectional realities. This underrepresentation has negative consequences for the participation and recognition of neurodivergent learners, particularly those with autism and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. We argue that policy reform is essential to reframe neurodiversity as difference, rather than disability. Drawing on the cultural model and intersectionality theory, this study undertakes a qualitative analysis of post-apartheid education policy documents and relevant scholarly literature. The analysis critically interrogates how neurodiversity is framed, the extent of its representation, and the implications of prevailing deficit-oriented conceptualizations for inclusive education in South Africa. Findings reveal that neurodiversity is largely absent from existing policies, and when referenced, it is mischaracterized through medicalized discourses that reinforce stigma. Such framings erase strengths-based perspectives, perpetuate negative perceptions of autism and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and constrain institutional capacity to develop inclusive practices responsive to South Africa's sociocultural context. We call for Afrocentric, intersectional, and community-driven policy reform. Reframing neurodiversity as human diversity would align with UNESCO's Salamanca Statement, enhance institutional inclusivity, and improve the educational experiences of neurodivergent learners across schools and universities in South Africa.

南非教育中的神经多样性。自闭症与注意缺陷/多动障碍的政策研究
这篇概念性论文主张在南非教育政策中承认神经多样性是实现全纳教育的组成部分。当前的政策话语将神经多样性与残疾混为一谈,从而使神经分化群体边缘化,再现了忽视交叉现实的基于缺陷的框架。这种代表性不足对神经发散型学习者的参与和认知产生了负面影响,尤其是那些患有自闭症和注意力缺陷/多动障碍的学习者。我们认为,政策改革对于将神经多样性重新定义为差异而不是残疾至关重要。本研究利用文化模型和交叉性理论,对种族隔离后的教育政策文件和相关学术文献进行定性分析。该分析批判性地询问了神经多样性是如何构建的,其代表性的程度,以及南非包容性教育中普遍存在的以赤字为导向的概念的含义。研究结果表明,现有政策在很大程度上缺乏神经多样性,当被引用时,它被通过强化污名的医学话语错误地描述。这种框架消除了基于优势的观点,使对自闭症和注意力缺陷/多动障碍的负面看法永久化,并限制了制定符合南非社会文化背景的包容性做法的机构能力。我们呼吁进行以非洲为中心、跨领域和社区驱动的政策改革。将神经多样性重新定义为人类多样性将符合教科文组织的《萨拉曼卡声明》,增强机构包容性,并改善南非各中小学和大学神经多样性学习者的教育体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Published for The Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues (SPSSI), the Journal of Social Issues (JSI) brings behavioral and social science theory, empirical evidence, and practice to bear on human and social problems. Each issue of the journal focuses on a single topic - recent issues, for example, have addressed poverty, housing and health; privacy as a social and psychological concern; youth and violence; and the impact of social class on education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书