Mountain cedar pollinosis: can it occur in non-atopics?

M J Reid, L A Schwietz, B A Whisman, R B Moss
{"title":"Mountain cedar pollinosis: can it occur in non-atopics?","authors":"M J Reid,&nbsp;L A Schwietz,&nbsp;B A Whisman,&nbsp;R B Moss","doi":"10.2500/108854188779023450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 1984 Ramirez postulated the existance of two subgroups of patients with Mountain Cedar (MC) pollinosis. One subgroup had a single positive skin test (SPST) to MC only, lacked other atopic diseases, and required prolonged MC exposure to develop the disease. The second subgroup had multiple positive skin tests (MPST) in addition to MC, had other atopic diseases, and developed clinical symptoms after a shorter period of MC exposure. To validate these findings, and to explore the clinical and immunologic differences between these two subgroups, 13 SPST and nine MPST patients underwent immunotherapy with MC pollen extract. Six SPST and ten non-allergic controls did not receive immunotherapy. MC specific IgE (sIgE), MC sIgG, and MC sIgG subclasses were measured by ELISA pre and intra season. Symptom Medication Score (SMS) were measured during the MC season. SPST patients had a significantly lower baseline sIgE than MPST patients, 2.1 IU/ml versus 22.3 IU/ml, p = 0.023, and were also older than MPST patients, 52.4 versus 32.2 years, p less than 0.001. Baseline MC sIgG and MC sIgG subclass antibody levels were similar in both patient groups. SMS were lower in treated SPST patients compared to treated MPST patients, p less than 0.01, but in vitro responses to immunotherapy were not significantly different between the two groups. MC sIgE, MC sIgG, MC sIgG1 and MC sIgG4 rose in both treated groups. MC sIgG1 (but not MC sIgG4) rose during the MC season in both non-immunotherapy groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":77755,"journal":{"name":"New England and regional allergy proceedings","volume":"9 3","pages":"225-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2500/108854188779023450","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New England and regional allergy proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2500/108854188779023450","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

In 1984 Ramirez postulated the existance of two subgroups of patients with Mountain Cedar (MC) pollinosis. One subgroup had a single positive skin test (SPST) to MC only, lacked other atopic diseases, and required prolonged MC exposure to develop the disease. The second subgroup had multiple positive skin tests (MPST) in addition to MC, had other atopic diseases, and developed clinical symptoms after a shorter period of MC exposure. To validate these findings, and to explore the clinical and immunologic differences between these two subgroups, 13 SPST and nine MPST patients underwent immunotherapy with MC pollen extract. Six SPST and ten non-allergic controls did not receive immunotherapy. MC specific IgE (sIgE), MC sIgG, and MC sIgG subclasses were measured by ELISA pre and intra season. Symptom Medication Score (SMS) were measured during the MC season. SPST patients had a significantly lower baseline sIgE than MPST patients, 2.1 IU/ml versus 22.3 IU/ml, p = 0.023, and were also older than MPST patients, 52.4 versus 32.2 years, p less than 0.001. Baseline MC sIgG and MC sIgG subclass antibody levels were similar in both patient groups. SMS were lower in treated SPST patients compared to treated MPST patients, p less than 0.01, but in vitro responses to immunotherapy were not significantly different between the two groups. MC sIgE, MC sIgG, MC sIgG1 and MC sIgG4 rose in both treated groups. MC sIgG1 (but not MC sIgG4) rose during the MC season in both non-immunotherapy groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

山杉木花粉症:非特应性会发生吗?
1984年,Ramirez假设存在两个山雪松(MC)传粉症患者亚群。一个亚组仅对MC有单一皮肤试验阳性(SPST),缺乏其他特应性疾病,并且需要长时间接触MC才会发生疾病。第二亚组除MC外有多项皮肤试验阳性(MPST),有其他特应性疾病,并在较短时间的MC暴露后出现临床症状。为了验证这些发现,并探讨这两个亚组之间的临床和免疫学差异,13例SPST和9例MPST患者接受了MC花粉提取物的免疫治疗。6例SPST和10例非过敏对照组未接受免疫治疗。采用ELISA法测定季前和季内MC特异性IgE (sIgE)、MC sIgG和MC sIgG亚类。在MC季节测量症状用药评分(SMS)。SPST患者的基线sIgE明显低于MPST患者,分别为2.1 IU/ml和22.3 IU/ml, p = 0.023,而且SPST患者的年龄也比MPST患者大,分别为52.4岁和32.2岁,p < 0.001。两组患者的基线mcsigg和mcsigg亚类抗体水平相似。与MPST组相比,SPST组的SMS较低(p < 0.01),但两组对免疫治疗的体外反应无显著差异。MC sIgE、MC sIgG、MC sIgG1、MC sIgG4均升高。在非免疫治疗组,MC sIgG1(而非MC sIgG4)在MC季节升高。(摘要删节250字)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信