Romain Badouard , Inna Lyubareva , Patrick Maillé , Bruno Tuffin
{"title":"An inquiry into the neutrality of search engines: Developing tools and indicators to compare bias on socially sensitive topics","authors":"Romain Badouard , Inna Lyubareva , Patrick Maillé , Bruno Tuffin","doi":"10.1016/j.infsof.2025.107925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The digital transformation has profoundly reshaped information consumption, with search engines playing a critical role in determining user access to diverse media. Through algorithmic processes, these engines influence content visibility and aggregate news sources, thereby shaping public opinion. As gatekeepers of information, search engines impact the visibility of media outlets, affecting online traffic, revenue, and journalistic diversity. In the context of breaking news and societal issues, search engines facilitate the rapid dissemination of information, often shaping initial narratives. Understanding their role is essential for promoting transparency and ensuring access to a broad spectrum of information. Focusing on movements against police violence, this paper employs an original software tool, initially built to detect bias in search engines, to conduct a comparative analysis across 12 search engines for the terms “Black Lives Matter” and “Justice pour Adama”. Our innovative methodology uncovers biases in information diversity, offering valuable insights into the dynamics that influence the visibility of societal issues.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54983,"journal":{"name":"Information and Software Technology","volume":"189 ","pages":"Article 107925"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information and Software Technology","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950584925002642","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The digital transformation has profoundly reshaped information consumption, with search engines playing a critical role in determining user access to diverse media. Through algorithmic processes, these engines influence content visibility and aggregate news sources, thereby shaping public opinion. As gatekeepers of information, search engines impact the visibility of media outlets, affecting online traffic, revenue, and journalistic diversity. In the context of breaking news and societal issues, search engines facilitate the rapid dissemination of information, often shaping initial narratives. Understanding their role is essential for promoting transparency and ensuring access to a broad spectrum of information. Focusing on movements against police violence, this paper employs an original software tool, initially built to detect bias in search engines, to conduct a comparative analysis across 12 search engines for the terms “Black Lives Matter” and “Justice pour Adama”. Our innovative methodology uncovers biases in information diversity, offering valuable insights into the dynamics that influence the visibility of societal issues.
数字化转型深刻地重塑了信息消费,搜索引擎在决定用户访问各种媒体方面发挥着关键作用。通过算法过程,这些引擎影响内容可见性和聚合新闻来源,从而塑造公众舆论。作为信息的守门人,搜索引擎影响着媒体的知名度,影响着在线流量、收入和新闻的多样性。在突发新闻和社会问题的背景下,搜索引擎促进了信息的快速传播,往往塑造了最初的叙述。了解它们的作用对于促进透明度和确保获得广泛的信息至关重要。本文以反对警察暴力的运动为重点,采用了一种最初用于检测搜索引擎偏见的原创软件工具,在12个搜索引擎上对“Black Lives Matter”和“Justice pour Adama”这两个词进行了比较分析。我们的创新方法揭示了信息多样性中的偏见,为影响社会问题可见性的动态提供了有价值的见解。
期刊介绍:
Information and Software Technology is the international archival journal focusing on research and experience that contributes to the improvement of software development practices. The journal''s scope includes methods and techniques to better engineer software and manage its development. Articles submitted for review should have a clear component of software engineering or address ways to improve the engineering and management of software development. Areas covered by the journal include:
• Software management, quality and metrics,
• Software processes,
• Software architecture, modelling, specification, design and programming
• Functional and non-functional software requirements
• Software testing and verification & validation
• Empirical studies of all aspects of engineering and managing software development
Short Communications is a new section dedicated to short papers addressing new ideas, controversial opinions, "Negative" results and much more. Read the Guide for authors for more information.
The journal encourages and welcomes submissions of systematic literature studies (reviews and maps) within the scope of the journal. Information and Software Technology is the premiere outlet for systematic literature studies in software engineering.