A stakeholder-centric fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS framework for prioritizing challenges and solutions in the sustainable circular supply chain of electric vehicle batteries

IF 6.8 Q1 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-16 DOI:10.1016/j.clscn.2025.100272
V.M. Aishwarya , Banu Yetkin Ekren , Tej Singh , Vedant Singh
{"title":"A stakeholder-centric fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS framework for prioritizing challenges and solutions in the sustainable circular supply chain of electric vehicle batteries","authors":"V.M. Aishwarya ,&nbsp;Banu Yetkin Ekren ,&nbsp;Tej Singh ,&nbsp;Vedant Singh","doi":"10.1016/j.clscn.2025.100272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The worldwide shift to electric mobility has rendered the establishment of sustainable and circular electric vehicle (EV) battery supply chains an immediate imperative. This study proposes a stakeholder-centric, hybrid multi-criteria decision-making framework that incorporates Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process and Fuzzy Technique of Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution to prioritize challenges and solutions in the EV battery supply chain. Drawing on stakeholder and sustainability theories, the framework evaluates 10 primary challenge domains, 35 sub-challenges, and 14 solution strategies based on insights from six key stakeholder groups: mining and resource extraction, raw material procurement, manufacturing and product development, supply chain and logistics, product management and strategy, and research and development. FAHP results identify environmental resource and lifecycle concerns and supply network robustness and economic stability as the most significant challenge areas. At the sub-criteria level, stakeholders prioritized scarcity and sustainability of vital resources and vulnerabilities in supply chain architecture. FTOPSIS analysis ranks policy framework and compliance and collaborative and stakeholder engagement as the most influential and widely endorsed solution strategies. A foresight-based sensitivity analysis for the year 2040 compares two contrasting future scenarios: a fully developed circular battery ecosystem and another marked by global supply chain volatility and heavy import dependence. Innovation-driven solutions dominate the former, while policy preparedness and economic incentives dominate in the latter. This study offers a novel, transferable framework that aligns stakeholder priorities with circular economy objectives, providing strategic guidance for fostering resilient and sustainable EV battery supply chains across global regions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100253,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100272"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277239092500071X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The worldwide shift to electric mobility has rendered the establishment of sustainable and circular electric vehicle (EV) battery supply chains an immediate imperative. This study proposes a stakeholder-centric, hybrid multi-criteria decision-making framework that incorporates Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process and Fuzzy Technique of Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution to prioritize challenges and solutions in the EV battery supply chain. Drawing on stakeholder and sustainability theories, the framework evaluates 10 primary challenge domains, 35 sub-challenges, and 14 solution strategies based on insights from six key stakeholder groups: mining and resource extraction, raw material procurement, manufacturing and product development, supply chain and logistics, product management and strategy, and research and development. FAHP results identify environmental resource and lifecycle concerns and supply network robustness and economic stability as the most significant challenge areas. At the sub-criteria level, stakeholders prioritized scarcity and sustainability of vital resources and vulnerabilities in supply chain architecture. FTOPSIS analysis ranks policy framework and compliance and collaborative and stakeholder engagement as the most influential and widely endorsed solution strategies. A foresight-based sensitivity analysis for the year 2040 compares two contrasting future scenarios: a fully developed circular battery ecosystem and another marked by global supply chain volatility and heavy import dependence. Innovation-driven solutions dominate the former, while policy preparedness and economic incentives dominate in the latter. This study offers a novel, transferable framework that aligns stakeholder priorities with circular economy objectives, providing strategic guidance for fostering resilient and sustainable EV battery supply chains across global regions.
一个以利益相关者为中心的模糊AHP-TOPSIS框架,用于优先考虑电动汽车电池可持续循环供应链中的挑战和解决方案
全球向电动交通的转变使得建立可持续和循环的电动汽车(EV)电池供应链势在必行。本文提出了一种以利益相关者为中心的混合多准则决策框架,该框架结合模糊层次分析法和模糊理想方案相似性偏好排序技术,对电动汽车电池供应链中的挑战和解决方案进行优先排序。根据利益相关者和可持续发展理论,该框架评估了10个主要挑战领域、35个子挑战和14个解决方案策略,这些策略基于六个关键利益相关者群体的见解:采矿和资源开采、原材料采购、制造和产品开发、供应链和物流、产品管理和战略以及研发。FAHP结果将环境资源和生命周期问题、供应网络稳健性和经济稳定性确定为最重大的挑战领域。在子标准层面,利益相关者优先考虑供应链架构中重要资源的稀缺性和可持续性以及脆弱性。FTOPSIS分析将政策框架和合规以及合作和利益相关者参与列为最具影响力和最广泛认可的解决方案战略。一项针对2040年的前瞻性敏感性分析比较了两种截然不同的未来情景:一种是完全发达的循环电池生态系统,另一种是全球供应链波动和严重依赖进口的生态系统。创新驱动的解决方案在前者占主导地位,而政策准备和经济激励在后者占主导地位。本研究提供了一个新颖的、可转移的框架,使利益相关者的优先事项与循环经济目标保持一致,为在全球各地培养有弹性和可持续的电动汽车电池供应链提供战略指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书