Segmentation of ecological guilt and sustainable food consumption – A European cross-country perspective

IF 6.1 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Cleaner and Responsible Consumption Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-22 DOI:10.1016/j.clrc.2025.100347
Brigitta Unger-Plasek , Zoltán Lakner , Ágoston Temesi
{"title":"Segmentation of ecological guilt and sustainable food consumption – A European cross-country perspective","authors":"Brigitta Unger-Plasek ,&nbsp;Zoltán Lakner ,&nbsp;Ágoston Temesi","doi":"10.1016/j.clrc.2025.100347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Food consumption habits are one of the most direct and active forms of consumer behaviour through which individuals impact their environment. This behaviour does not evolve in isolation; rather, it is influenced by a variety of factors, including guilt. Within the context of sustainability, ecological guilt is a particularly salient determinant. This study explores the relationship between ecological guilt and the core principles of sustainable food consumption. Eco-guilt may influence the fundamental dimensions of overconsumption, food waste, dietary composition, or recycling, although not necessarily all of them. This study aimed to develop consumer segments based on the elements of the food eco-guilt scale and describe these clusters in terms of sustainable food consumption principles and other consumer characteristics. Data were collected from a sample of 3000 individuals in four countries and structured to reflect national population distributions across several key demographics. Cluster analysis identified two distinct segments: the ‘Guilt-Reactive’ and ‘The Uncertain’. The respondents in the ‘Guilt-Reactive’ group exhibited significantly stronger tendencies towards sustainable food-related behaviours than those in the ‘The Uncertain’ group—particularly regarding recycling, avoiding overconsumption, and reducing food waste. However, no clear commitment to dietary aspects was observed, as responses in this domain tended to be neutral rather than supportive. These findings highlight that while ecological guilt may motivate certain sustainable consumption behaviours, dietary changes, such as increasing the proportion of plant-based foods and reducing intake of highly processed, nutrient-poor products, may require motivational drivers that are stronger or of different types than eco-guilt.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34617,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner and Responsible Consumption","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 100347"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner and Responsible Consumption","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666784325000981","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Food consumption habits are one of the most direct and active forms of consumer behaviour through which individuals impact their environment. This behaviour does not evolve in isolation; rather, it is influenced by a variety of factors, including guilt. Within the context of sustainability, ecological guilt is a particularly salient determinant. This study explores the relationship between ecological guilt and the core principles of sustainable food consumption. Eco-guilt may influence the fundamental dimensions of overconsumption, food waste, dietary composition, or recycling, although not necessarily all of them. This study aimed to develop consumer segments based on the elements of the food eco-guilt scale and describe these clusters in terms of sustainable food consumption principles and other consumer characteristics. Data were collected from a sample of 3000 individuals in four countries and structured to reflect national population distributions across several key demographics. Cluster analysis identified two distinct segments: the ‘Guilt-Reactive’ and ‘The Uncertain’. The respondents in the ‘Guilt-Reactive’ group exhibited significantly stronger tendencies towards sustainable food-related behaviours than those in the ‘The Uncertain’ group—particularly regarding recycling, avoiding overconsumption, and reducing food waste. However, no clear commitment to dietary aspects was observed, as responses in this domain tended to be neutral rather than supportive. These findings highlight that while ecological guilt may motivate certain sustainable consumption behaviours, dietary changes, such as increasing the proportion of plant-based foods and reducing intake of highly processed, nutrient-poor products, may require motivational drivers that are stronger or of different types than eco-guilt.
生态内疚和可持续食品消费的分割——欧洲跨国视角
食物消费习惯是个人影响环境的最直接和最积极的消费行为之一。这种行为不是孤立地进化的;相反,它受到各种因素的影响,包括内疚。在可持续发展的背景下,生态内疚是一个特别突出的决定因素。本研究探讨生态内疚与可持续食物消费核心原则之间的关系。生态内疚可能会影响到过度消费、食物浪费、饮食成分或回收等基本方面,尽管不一定是全部。本研究旨在根据食品生态内疚量表的要素来划分消费者群体,并根据可持续食品消费原则和其他消费者特征来描述这些群体。数据是从四个国家的3000人样本中收集的,其结构反映了几个关键人口统计数据的国家人口分布。聚类分析确定了两个不同的部分:“内疚-反应”和“不确定”。“内疚-反应”组的受访者比“不确定”组的受访者在可持续食物相关行为方面表现出明显更强的倾向,尤其是在回收利用、避免过度消费和减少食物浪费方面。然而,没有观察到对饮食方面的明确承诺,因为在这一领域的反应往往是中立的,而不是支持的。这些发现强调,虽然生态内疚可能激发某些可持续消费行为,但饮食改变,如增加植物性食物的比例和减少高度加工、营养不良产品的摄入,可能需要比生态内疚更强或不同类型的动机驱动因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cleaner and Responsible Consumption
Cleaner and Responsible Consumption Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
99 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书