Quantifying the differential relationship between red blood cell docosahexaenoic acid and cognition based on APOE-e4 carriership in multiple cohorts: illustration of an emerging statistical approach

IF 3.2
Nathan A. Ryder , Jason Westra , Aleix Sala-Vila , Jack Wolf , William S. Harris , Nathan L. Tintle
{"title":"Quantifying the differential relationship between red blood cell docosahexaenoic acid and cognition based on APOE-e4 carriership in multiple cohorts: illustration of an emerging statistical approach","authors":"Nathan A. Ryder ,&nbsp;Jason Westra ,&nbsp;Aleix Sala-Vila ,&nbsp;Jack Wolf ,&nbsp;William S. Harris ,&nbsp;Nathan L. Tintle","doi":"10.1016/j.plefa.2025.102713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Evidence is mounting that red blood cell membrane levels of docosahexaeonic acid (DHA) are directly associated with improved cognitive performance, with emerging questions about whether this relationship may be stronger in some individuals vs. others, especially those at high genetic risk of cognitive impairment via the <em>APOLIPOPROTEIN-E</em> (<em>APOE</em>) <em>ε4</em> allele. We investigated this relationship in <em>n</em> = 2158 participants without dementia from four separate cohorts (Offspring, Gen3, Omni I and Omni II) of the multi-cohort Framingham Heart Study, aged 50 to 70 years old. To demonstrate an emerging alternative of improved data sharing, we conducted the analysis using only cohort-level, summary data which is non-individually identifiable and easily shareable. We detected a statistically significant interaction between <em>APOE-ε4</em> status and DHA in multivariable models adjusting for relevant demographic and medical history covariates and predicting cognitive impairment (<em>p</em> = 0.039). Stratified adjusted model results detected a stronger inverse association between cognitive impairment and DHA for <em>APOE-ε4</em> carriers (-0.13; 95 % CI: (-0.20, -0.06) minutes per 1 % increase in DHA), as compared to non-carriers (-0.06; 95 % CI: (-0.11, -0.02)), though both were statistically significant (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). We also analyzed the data using two, standard, widely used statistical approaches (1) Individual level data analysis (identical results) and (2) standard meta-analysis (slightly weaker evidence of interaction; <em>p</em> = 0.047). Our analysis demonstrates not only the putative importance of DHA on cognition, especially among <em>APOE-ε4</em> carriers, but the potential for an emerging class of data-sharing methods to accelerate the future pace of cross-cohort analyses by not requiring access to individual-level data.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94179,"journal":{"name":"Prostaglandins, leukotrienes, and essential fatty acids","volume":"207 ","pages":"Article 102713"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prostaglandins, leukotrienes, and essential fatty acids","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095232782500050X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evidence is mounting that red blood cell membrane levels of docosahexaeonic acid (DHA) are directly associated with improved cognitive performance, with emerging questions about whether this relationship may be stronger in some individuals vs. others, especially those at high genetic risk of cognitive impairment via the APOLIPOPROTEIN-E (APOE) ε4 allele. We investigated this relationship in n = 2158 participants without dementia from four separate cohorts (Offspring, Gen3, Omni I and Omni II) of the multi-cohort Framingham Heart Study, aged 50 to 70 years old. To demonstrate an emerging alternative of improved data sharing, we conducted the analysis using only cohort-level, summary data which is non-individually identifiable and easily shareable. We detected a statistically significant interaction between APOE-ε4 status and DHA in multivariable models adjusting for relevant demographic and medical history covariates and predicting cognitive impairment (p = 0.039). Stratified adjusted model results detected a stronger inverse association between cognitive impairment and DHA for APOE-ε4 carriers (-0.13; 95 % CI: (-0.20, -0.06) minutes per 1 % increase in DHA), as compared to non-carriers (-0.06; 95 % CI: (-0.11, -0.02)), though both were statistically significant (p < 0.05). We also analyzed the data using two, standard, widely used statistical approaches (1) Individual level data analysis (identical results) and (2) standard meta-analysis (slightly weaker evidence of interaction; p = 0.047). Our analysis demonstrates not only the putative importance of DHA on cognition, especially among APOE-ε4 carriers, but the potential for an emerging class of data-sharing methods to accelerate the future pace of cross-cohort analyses by not requiring access to individual-level data.
基于APOE-e4携带者在多个队列中量化红细胞二十二碳六烯酸与认知之间的差异关系:一种新兴统计方法的说明
越来越多的证据表明,红细胞膜二十二碳六烯酸(DHA)水平与认知能力的提高直接相关,但这种关系是否在某些个体中比在其他人中更强,特别是那些通过载脂蛋白e (APOE) ε4等位基因具有认知障碍高遗传风险的个体中,这一问题正在出现。我们在多队列Framingham心脏研究的4个独立队列(Offspring, Gen3, Omni I和Omni II)中n = 2158名无痴呆的参与者中调查了这种关系,这些参与者年龄在50至70岁之间。为了展示一种改进数据共享的新兴替代方案,我们仅使用非个人可识别且易于共享的队列水平汇总数据进行了分析。我们发现APOE-ε4状态与DHA在多变量模型中具有统计学意义的交互作用,调整了相关的人口统计学和病史协变量,并预测认知障碍(p = 0.039)。分层调整模型结果发现,APOE-ε4携带者的认知障碍与DHA之间存在更强的负相关(-0.13;95% CI:(-0.20, -0.06)分钟/ DHA增加1%),而非携带者(-0.06;95% CI:(-0.11, -0.02)),尽管两者均具有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。我们还使用两种标准的、广泛使用的统计方法分析数据(1)个体水平数据分析(相同的结果)和(2)标准荟萃分析(相互作用的证据略弱;p = 0.047)。我们的分析不仅证明了DHA对认知的重要性,特别是在APOE-ε4携带者中,而且表明了一种新兴的数据共享方法的潜力,这种方法可以通过不需要访问个人水平的数据来加快跨队列分析的未来步伐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prostaglandins, leukotrienes, and essential fatty acids
Prostaglandins, leukotrienes, and essential fatty acids Clinical Biochemistry, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
64 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书