Machine-learned summary statistics for Bayesian inference of systems biology–model parameters: Opportunities and challenges

IF 2.2 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Current Opinion in Systems Biology Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-03 DOI:10.1016/j.coisb.2025.100560
Atiyeh Ahmadi , Lena Podina , Sebastian Höpfl , Brian Ingalls
{"title":"Machine-learned summary statistics for Bayesian inference of systems biology–model parameters: Opportunities and challenges","authors":"Atiyeh Ahmadi ,&nbsp;Lena Podina ,&nbsp;Sebastian Höpfl ,&nbsp;Brian Ingalls","doi":"10.1016/j.coisb.2025.100560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mechanistic systems biology models can capture complex dynamic interactions, but their accuracy often relies on parameter inference from high-dimensional, noisy data with corresponding intractable likelihoods. Approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) avoids likelihood evaluation by comparing simulated and observed data via low-dimensional summary statistics. However, effective selection of these summaries remains a limitation. Recent advances in machine learning offer algorithmic approaches to the selection of informative summaries, improving parameter identifiability, and reducing computational cost. Machine learning of summaries, however, introduces new challenges. We survey summary selection techniques for ABC, discuss how automated summaries can enhance parameter identifiability and inference efficiency, discuss algorithmic trade-offs in informativeness, tractability, and interpretability, and highlight strategies to ensure reliable inference. Through biological case studies, we review recently developed methods for selecting summaries. Finally, we outline challenges and future directions for leveraging machine-learned summaries to support ABC as a powerful and transparent tool for parameter inference in systems biology.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37400,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Systems Biology","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 100560"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Systems Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452310025000204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mechanistic systems biology models can capture complex dynamic interactions, but their accuracy often relies on parameter inference from high-dimensional, noisy data with corresponding intractable likelihoods. Approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) avoids likelihood evaluation by comparing simulated and observed data via low-dimensional summary statistics. However, effective selection of these summaries remains a limitation. Recent advances in machine learning offer algorithmic approaches to the selection of informative summaries, improving parameter identifiability, and reducing computational cost. Machine learning of summaries, however, introduces new challenges. We survey summary selection techniques for ABC, discuss how automated summaries can enhance parameter identifiability and inference efficiency, discuss algorithmic trade-offs in informativeness, tractability, and interpretability, and highlight strategies to ensure reliable inference. Through biological case studies, we review recently developed methods for selecting summaries. Finally, we outline challenges and future directions for leveraging machine-learned summaries to support ABC as a powerful and transparent tool for parameter inference in systems biology.
系统生物学模型参数贝叶斯推理的机器学习汇总统计:机遇与挑战
机械系统生物学模型可以捕获复杂的动态相互作用,但其准确性往往依赖于具有相应难处理似然的高维噪声数据的参数推断。近似贝叶斯计算(ABC)通过低维汇总统计来比较模拟数据和观测数据,从而避免了似然评估。然而,有效地选择这些摘要仍然是一个限制。机器学习的最新进展为选择信息摘要、提高参数可识别性和降低计算成本提供了算法方法。然而,摘要的机器学习带来了新的挑战。我们调查了ABC的摘要选择技术,讨论了自动摘要如何提高参数可识别性和推理效率,讨论了算法在信息性、可追溯性和可解释性方面的权衡,并强调了确保可靠推理的策略。通过生物学案例研究,我们回顾了最近发展的选择摘要的方法。最后,我们概述了利用机器学习摘要来支持ABC作为系统生物学中参数推断的强大透明工具的挑战和未来方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Systems Biology
Current Opinion in Systems Biology Mathematics-Applied Mathematics
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
2.70%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Systems Biology is a new systematic review journal that aims to provide specialists with a unique and educational platform to keep up-to-date with the expanding volume of information published in the field of Systems Biology. It publishes polished, concise and timely systematic reviews and opinion articles. In addition to describing recent trends, the authors are encouraged to give their subjective opinion on the topics discussed. As this is such a broad discipline, we have determined themed sections each of which is reviewed once a year. The following areas will be covered by Current Opinion in Systems Biology: -Genomics and Epigenomics -Gene Regulation -Metabolic Networks -Cancer and Systemic Diseases -Mathematical Modelling -Big Data Acquisition and Analysis -Systems Pharmacology and Physiology -Synthetic Biology -Stem Cells, Development, and Differentiation -Systems Biology of Mold Organisms -Systems Immunology and Host-Pathogen Interaction -Systems Ecology and Evolution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书