{"title":"Energy transitions post–Russia–Ukraine war: challenges and policy implications in Germany and Italy","authors":"Yeong Jae Kim , Kyonggi Min , Seong-Hoon Cho","doi":"10.1016/j.tej.2025.107518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the pursuit of global net-zero emissions by 2050, the Russia–Ukraine War has emerged as a potential disruptor, challenging progress toward this critical objective. We explore the repercussions of the conflict on the European Union’s initial energy transition goals, with a keen focus on electricity generation. Analyzing projections for coal, natural gas, nuclear, hydro, and renewable energy in Germany and Italy over the warring period, the study unveils divergent energy landscapes influenced by the conflict’s effects. Germany’s nuclear phase-out, coupled with the wartime surge in coal use, threatens its ability to meet the 2050 net-zero target. Despite minimal changes in electricity supply and GHG emissions in Italy, policymakers should continue implementing measures to reduce GHG emissions further. Both countries need more ambitious renewable targets. Recommendations for Germany encompass accelerating renewable deployment to offset the recent surge in coal use, whereas those for Italy focus on bolstering hydropower infrastructure, sustaining renewable investments, and strategizing natural gas imports.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35642,"journal":{"name":"Electricity Journal","volume":"38 4","pages":"Article 107518"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electricity Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040619025000636","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In the pursuit of global net-zero emissions by 2050, the Russia–Ukraine War has emerged as a potential disruptor, challenging progress toward this critical objective. We explore the repercussions of the conflict on the European Union’s initial energy transition goals, with a keen focus on electricity generation. Analyzing projections for coal, natural gas, nuclear, hydro, and renewable energy in Germany and Italy over the warring period, the study unveils divergent energy landscapes influenced by the conflict’s effects. Germany’s nuclear phase-out, coupled with the wartime surge in coal use, threatens its ability to meet the 2050 net-zero target. Despite minimal changes in electricity supply and GHG emissions in Italy, policymakers should continue implementing measures to reduce GHG emissions further. Both countries need more ambitious renewable targets. Recommendations for Germany encompass accelerating renewable deployment to offset the recent surge in coal use, whereas those for Italy focus on bolstering hydropower infrastructure, sustaining renewable investments, and strategizing natural gas imports.
Electricity JournalBusiness, Management and Accounting-Business and International Management
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
95
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍:
The Electricity Journal is the leading journal in electric power policy. The journal deals primarily with fuel diversity and the energy mix needed for optimal energy market performance, and therefore covers the full spectrum of energy, from coal, nuclear, natural gas and oil, to renewable energy sources including hydro, solar, geothermal and wind power. Recently, the journal has been publishing in emerging areas including energy storage, microgrid strategies, dynamic pricing, cyber security, climate change, cap and trade, distributed generation, net metering, transmission and generation market dynamics. The Electricity Journal aims to bring together the most thoughtful and influential thinkers globally from across industry, practitioners, government, policymakers and academia. The Editorial Advisory Board is comprised of electric industry thought leaders who have served as regulators, consultants, litigators, and market advocates. Their collective experience helps ensure that the most relevant and thought-provoking issues are presented to our readers, and helps navigate the emerging shape and design of the electricity/energy industry.