Energy transitions post–Russia–Ukraine war: challenges and policy implications in Germany and Italy

IF 2.6 Q1 Social Sciences
Electricity Journal Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-24 DOI:10.1016/j.tej.2025.107518
Yeong Jae Kim , Kyonggi Min , Seong-Hoon Cho
{"title":"Energy transitions post–Russia–Ukraine war: challenges and policy implications in Germany and Italy","authors":"Yeong Jae Kim ,&nbsp;Kyonggi Min ,&nbsp;Seong-Hoon Cho","doi":"10.1016/j.tej.2025.107518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the pursuit of global net-zero emissions by 2050, the Russia–Ukraine War has emerged as a potential disruptor, challenging progress toward this critical objective. We explore the repercussions of the conflict on the European Union’s initial energy transition goals, with a keen focus on electricity generation. Analyzing projections for coal, natural gas, nuclear, hydro, and renewable energy in Germany and Italy over the warring period, the study unveils divergent energy landscapes influenced by the conflict’s effects. Germany’s nuclear phase-out, coupled with the wartime surge in coal use, threatens its ability to meet the 2050 net-zero target. Despite minimal changes in electricity supply and GHG emissions in Italy, policymakers should continue implementing measures to reduce GHG emissions further. Both countries need more ambitious renewable targets. Recommendations for Germany encompass accelerating renewable deployment to offset the recent surge in coal use, whereas those for Italy focus on bolstering hydropower infrastructure, sustaining renewable investments, and strategizing natural gas imports.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":35642,"journal":{"name":"Electricity Journal","volume":"38 4","pages":"Article 107518"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electricity Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040619025000636","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the pursuit of global net-zero emissions by 2050, the Russia–Ukraine War has emerged as a potential disruptor, challenging progress toward this critical objective. We explore the repercussions of the conflict on the European Union’s initial energy transition goals, with a keen focus on electricity generation. Analyzing projections for coal, natural gas, nuclear, hydro, and renewable energy in Germany and Italy over the warring period, the study unveils divergent energy landscapes influenced by the conflict’s effects. Germany’s nuclear phase-out, coupled with the wartime surge in coal use, threatens its ability to meet the 2050 net-zero target. Despite minimal changes in electricity supply and GHG emissions in Italy, policymakers should continue implementing measures to reduce GHG emissions further. Both countries need more ambitious renewable targets. Recommendations for Germany encompass accelerating renewable deployment to offset the recent surge in coal use, whereas those for Italy focus on bolstering hydropower infrastructure, sustaining renewable investments, and strategizing natural gas imports.
俄乌战争后的能源转型:德国和意大利的挑战和政策影响
在追求到2050年实现全球净零排放的过程中,俄乌战争已经成为一个潜在的干扰因素,对实现这一关键目标的进展构成了挑战。我们探讨了冲突对欧盟最初能源转型目标的影响,重点关注发电。该研究分析了德国和意大利在战争期间对煤炭、天然气、核能、水电和可再生能源的预测,揭示了受冲突影响的不同能源格局。德国逐步淘汰核能,再加上战时煤炭使用量激增,威胁到其实现2050年净零排放目标的能力。尽管意大利的电力供应和温室气体排放变化很小,但政策制定者应继续实施进一步减少温室气体排放的措施。两国都需要制定更雄心勃勃的可再生能源目标。对德国的建议包括加速可再生能源的部署,以抵消最近煤炭使用量的激增,而对意大利的建议则侧重于加强水电基础设施,维持可再生能源投资,并制定天然气进口战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Electricity Journal
Electricity Journal Business, Management and Accounting-Business and International Management
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
95
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: The Electricity Journal is the leading journal in electric power policy. The journal deals primarily with fuel diversity and the energy mix needed for optimal energy market performance, and therefore covers the full spectrum of energy, from coal, nuclear, natural gas and oil, to renewable energy sources including hydro, solar, geothermal and wind power. Recently, the journal has been publishing in emerging areas including energy storage, microgrid strategies, dynamic pricing, cyber security, climate change, cap and trade, distributed generation, net metering, transmission and generation market dynamics. The Electricity Journal aims to bring together the most thoughtful and influential thinkers globally from across industry, practitioners, government, policymakers and academia. The Editorial Advisory Board is comprised of electric industry thought leaders who have served as regulators, consultants, litigators, and market advocates. Their collective experience helps ensure that the most relevant and thought-provoking issues are presented to our readers, and helps navigate the emerging shape and design of the electricity/energy industry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书