{"title":"Selection of the predator green lacewing Chrysoperla carnea for resistance to chlorfenapyr: stability, cross resistance, and fitness cost","authors":"Muhammad Abubakar , Sarfraz Ali Shad","doi":"10.1016/j.cropro.2025.107453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>An effective way to solve the problem of resistance development in pest populations is to integrate chemical and biological control. One hurdle to this combined strategy is the susceptibility of biocontrol agents to sprayed insecticides. In this study, a population of <em>Chrysoperla carnea</em> (Stephens) named Pirate-Sel was selected with chlorfenapyr to determine the gain in resistance, stability, and fitness cost. Pirate-Sel strain developed significantly high resistance (306.64 fold) after 18 generations of selection when compared with the laboratory susceptible population of <em>C. carnea.</em> The Pirate-Sel strain did not show cross-resistance to lambda-cyhalothrin (resistance ratio, RR = 0.64), spirotetramat (RR = 0.48), and triazofos (RR = 0.94). The Pirate-Sel strain was further reared for 5 generations without selection pressure resulting in a significant decrease of its resistance from 94329.29 mg of a.i./L to 22760.64 mg of a.i./L with a decrease in resistance ratio from 306.64-fold to 73.99-folds compared to the susceptible population. Two reciprocal crosses between Pirate-Sel and Unselected strain (Unsel) of <em>C. carnea</em> were also maintained in the laboratory; Cross-A (Pirate-Sel ♀ × Unsel ♂) and Cross-B (Unsel ♀ × Pirate-Sel ♂). The result of the fitness experiment showed that the egg hatching (%), pupation rate (%), and fecundity of Pirate-Sel population remained statistically similar to that of the Unsel population. The mean relative fitness value of Pirate-Sel, Unsel, Susceptible, Cross-A, and Cross-B strains of <em>C. carnea</em> was 1.17, 1.00, 0.77, 0.89, and 0.98, respectively. In conclusion, the development of high chlorfenapyr resistance in <em>C. carnea</em> did not affect negatively its biology, as resistance comes with no fitness cost. Our findings provide a basic knowledge of the integration of chemical and biological control for pest management with minimal or no negative effect on natural enemies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10785,"journal":{"name":"Crop Protection","volume":"199 ","pages":"Article 107453"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026121942500345X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
An effective way to solve the problem of resistance development in pest populations is to integrate chemical and biological control. One hurdle to this combined strategy is the susceptibility of biocontrol agents to sprayed insecticides. In this study, a population of Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) named Pirate-Sel was selected with chlorfenapyr to determine the gain in resistance, stability, and fitness cost. Pirate-Sel strain developed significantly high resistance (306.64 fold) after 18 generations of selection when compared with the laboratory susceptible population of C. carnea. The Pirate-Sel strain did not show cross-resistance to lambda-cyhalothrin (resistance ratio, RR = 0.64), spirotetramat (RR = 0.48), and triazofos (RR = 0.94). The Pirate-Sel strain was further reared for 5 generations without selection pressure resulting in a significant decrease of its resistance from 94329.29 mg of a.i./L to 22760.64 mg of a.i./L with a decrease in resistance ratio from 306.64-fold to 73.99-folds compared to the susceptible population. Two reciprocal crosses between Pirate-Sel and Unselected strain (Unsel) of C. carnea were also maintained in the laboratory; Cross-A (Pirate-Sel ♀ × Unsel ♂) and Cross-B (Unsel ♀ × Pirate-Sel ♂). The result of the fitness experiment showed that the egg hatching (%), pupation rate (%), and fecundity of Pirate-Sel population remained statistically similar to that of the Unsel population. The mean relative fitness value of Pirate-Sel, Unsel, Susceptible, Cross-A, and Cross-B strains of C. carnea was 1.17, 1.00, 0.77, 0.89, and 0.98, respectively. In conclusion, the development of high chlorfenapyr resistance in C. carnea did not affect negatively its biology, as resistance comes with no fitness cost. Our findings provide a basic knowledge of the integration of chemical and biological control for pest management with minimal or no negative effect on natural enemies.
期刊介绍:
The Editors of Crop Protection especially welcome papers describing an interdisciplinary approach showing how different control strategies can be integrated into practical pest management programs, covering high and low input agricultural systems worldwide. Crop Protection particularly emphasizes the practical aspects of control in the field and for protected crops, and includes work which may lead in the near future to more effective control. The journal does not duplicate the many existing excellent biological science journals, which deal mainly with the more fundamental aspects of plant pathology, applied zoology and weed science. Crop Protection covers all practical aspects of pest, disease and weed control, including the following topics:
-Abiotic damage-
Agronomic control methods-
Assessment of pest and disease damage-
Molecular methods for the detection and assessment of pests and diseases-
Biological control-
Biorational pesticides-
Control of animal pests of world crops-
Control of diseases of crop plants caused by microorganisms-
Control of weeds and integrated management-
Economic considerations-
Effects of plant growth regulators-
Environmental benefits of reduced pesticide use-
Environmental effects of pesticides-
Epidemiology of pests and diseases in relation to control-
GM Crops, and genetic engineering applications-
Importance and control of postharvest crop losses-
Integrated control-
Interrelationships and compatibility among different control strategies-
Invasive species as they relate to implications for crop protection-
Pesticide application methods-
Pest management-
Phytobiomes for pest and disease control-
Resistance management-
Sampling and monitoring schemes for diseases, nematodes, pests and weeds.