Acupuncture therapy for atrophic gastritis with upper gastrointestinal symptoms: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Jiashan Li , Yuning Qin , Liyun He , Feifei Gao , Ziyan Li , Tingting Liu , Zezhi Fan , Yi Guo , Tianyi Zhao , Xue Zhao
{"title":"Acupuncture therapy for atrophic gastritis with upper gastrointestinal symptoms: A systematic review and network meta-analysis","authors":"Jiashan Li ,&nbsp;Yuning Qin ,&nbsp;Liyun He ,&nbsp;Feifei Gao ,&nbsp;Ziyan Li ,&nbsp;Tingting Liu ,&nbsp;Zezhi Fan ,&nbsp;Yi Guo ,&nbsp;Tianyi Zhao ,&nbsp;Xue Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.eujim.2025.102572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Patients with atrophic gastritis (AG) exhibit typical upper gastrointestinal symptoms. Although acupuncture therapy can alleviate some gastrointestinal symptoms, it remains challenging to determine the optimal intervention for various symptoms. This study aimed to use network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the efficacy of acupuncture therapies for AG with upper gastrointestinal symptoms.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Twelve databases were systematically searched from inception to 25 November 2024 to identify randomized clinical trials or retrospective cohort studies that evaluated the efficacy of acupuncture therapies for AG with upper gastrointestinal symptoms. The primary outcomes were stomachache, flatulence, heartburn, hiccups, and appetite disorder (assessed using the traditional Chinese medicine syndrome score, numeric rating scale or visual analogue score), and acid reflux (assessed using the symptom score). The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool was used to construct a risk-of-bias map. R 4.3.2 and JAGS 4.3.1 were used to conduct the NMA. The Confidence in NMA web application was used to assess the quality of evidence.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The NMA analyzed 26 studies involving 3,076 participants. For flatulence, acupoint sticking therapy was ranked first (i.e., most effective), with a surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) of 83.2 %, and low to very low certainty. Manual acupuncture was ranked first for acid reflux (SUCRA 87.19 %, low to very low certainty) and appetite disorder (SUCRA 67.5 %, moderate to very low certainty). Warm acupuncture plus traditional Chinese medicine was ranked first for stomachache (SUCRA 75.0 %, low to very low certainty), while western medicine was ranked first for hiccups (SUCRA 91.93 %, very low certainty). There were no significant differences in efficacy between many acupuncture therapies.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Patients with AG with flatulence may benefit from acupoint sticking therapy, while the symptoms of acid reflux or appetite disorder may be relieved through manual acupuncture. However, clinical decision-making should be combined with practical factors due to the limited number of significant differences in the efficacy of various acupuncture therapies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11932,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Integrative Medicine","volume":"80 ","pages":"Article 102572"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Integrative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876382025001155","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Patients with atrophic gastritis (AG) exhibit typical upper gastrointestinal symptoms. Although acupuncture therapy can alleviate some gastrointestinal symptoms, it remains challenging to determine the optimal intervention for various symptoms. This study aimed to use network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the efficacy of acupuncture therapies for AG with upper gastrointestinal symptoms.

Methods

Twelve databases were systematically searched from inception to 25 November 2024 to identify randomized clinical trials or retrospective cohort studies that evaluated the efficacy of acupuncture therapies for AG with upper gastrointestinal symptoms. The primary outcomes were stomachache, flatulence, heartburn, hiccups, and appetite disorder (assessed using the traditional Chinese medicine syndrome score, numeric rating scale or visual analogue score), and acid reflux (assessed using the symptom score). The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool was used to construct a risk-of-bias map. R 4.3.2 and JAGS 4.3.1 were used to conduct the NMA. The Confidence in NMA web application was used to assess the quality of evidence.

Results

The NMA analyzed 26 studies involving 3,076 participants. For flatulence, acupoint sticking therapy was ranked first (i.e., most effective), with a surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) of 83.2 %, and low to very low certainty. Manual acupuncture was ranked first for acid reflux (SUCRA 87.19 %, low to very low certainty) and appetite disorder (SUCRA 67.5 %, moderate to very low certainty). Warm acupuncture plus traditional Chinese medicine was ranked first for stomachache (SUCRA 75.0 %, low to very low certainty), while western medicine was ranked first for hiccups (SUCRA 91.93 %, very low certainty). There were no significant differences in efficacy between many acupuncture therapies.

Conclusion

Patients with AG with flatulence may benefit from acupoint sticking therapy, while the symptoms of acid reflux or appetite disorder may be relieved through manual acupuncture. However, clinical decision-making should be combined with practical factors due to the limited number of significant differences in the efficacy of various acupuncture therapies.
针刺治疗萎缩性胃炎伴上消化道症状:系统综述和网络荟萃分析
摘要萎缩性胃炎(agg)患者表现出典型的上胃肠道症状。虽然针灸治疗可以缓解一些胃肠道症状,但确定各种症状的最佳干预措施仍然具有挑战性。本研究旨在采用网络meta分析(NMA)比较针刺疗法治疗AG合并上消化道症状的疗效。方法系统检索12个数据库,从建立到2024年11月25日,以确定评估针灸治疗上胃肠道症状的AG疗效的随机临床试验或回顾性队列研究。主要结局为胃痛、肠胃胀气、胃灼热、打嗝和食欲障碍(采用中医证型评分、数值评定量表或视觉模拟评分进行评估)和胃酸反流(采用症状评分进行评估)。使用Cochrane风险偏倚2工具构建风险偏倚图。采用r4.3.2和JAGS 4.3.1进行NMA。NMA网络应用的置信度用于评估证据的质量。结果NMA分析了26项研究,涉及3076名参与者。对于胀气,穴位贴敷疗法排名第一(即最有效),其累积排名曲线下曲面(SUCRA)为83.2%,确定性低至极低。手动针灸治疗胃酸反流(SUCRA 87.19%,低至极低确定性)和食欲障碍(SUCRA 67.5%,中至极低确定性)排名第一。温针加中药治疗胃痛疗效第一(SUCRA 75.0%,低至极低确定性),西药治疗打嗝疗效第一(SUCRA 91.93%,极低确定性)。多种针灸疗法的疗效无显著差异。结论穴位贴敷法对胃胀气有明显的治疗效果,而手针刺法对胃酸反流或食欲障碍症状有明显的缓解作用。然而,由于各种针灸疗法疗效显著差异的数量有限,临床决策应结合实际因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Integrative Medicine
European Journal of Integrative Medicine INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
102
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Integrative Medicine (EuJIM) considers manuscripts from a wide range of complementary and integrative health care disciplines, with a particular focus on whole systems approaches, public health, self management and traditional medical systems. The journal strives to connect conventional medicine and evidence based complementary medicine. We encourage submissions reporting research with relevance for integrative clinical practice and interprofessional education. EuJIM aims to be of interest to both conventional and integrative audiences, including healthcare practitioners, researchers, health care organisations, educationalists, and all those who seek objective and critical information on integrative medicine. To achieve this aim EuJIM provides an innovative international and interdisciplinary platform linking researchers and clinicians. The journal focuses primarily on original research articles including systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, other clinical studies, qualitative, observational and epidemiological studies. In addition we welcome short reviews, opinion articles and contributions relating to health services and policy, health economics and psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书