Fazli Hameed , Muhammad Mannan Afzal , Anis Ur Rehman Khalil , Junzeng Xu , Shah Fahad Rahim , Raheel Osman , Khalil Ahmad , Yongqiang Li , Tangyuan Ning
{"title":"Integrated water and nitrogen management sustains rice yield and efficiency under changing climate scenarios","authors":"Fazli Hameed , Muhammad Mannan Afzal , Anis Ur Rehman Khalil , Junzeng Xu , Shah Fahad Rahim , Raheel Osman , Khalil Ahmad , Yongqiang Li , Tangyuan Ning","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><div>Evidence on how alternate wetting and drying (AWD) irrigation and nitrogen management together influence rice yield and resource efficiency under climate variability is still limited, yet such knowledge is critical for climate-smart agricultural planning. Climate change and inefficient agronomic practices increasingly threaten the sustainability of rice production systems by intensifying water scarcity and lowering nitrogen use efficiency (NUE).</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>The objective of this study was to assess the combined effects of irrigation regimes, continuous flooding (CF) and AWD, and nitrogen application strategies on rice yield, nitrogen uptake, and resource use efficiency under projected climate change scenarios using the ORYZA (v3) model.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>The ORYZA (v<sub>3</sub>) crop growth model was used to simulate rice growth, water consumption (ET), irrigation water requirements (IR), water use efficiency (WUE) and nitrogen use efficiencies (NUE) under historical and future climate scenarios (RCP2.6 to RCP8.5). Two irrigation strategies: CF and AWD, and multiple nitrogen application schedules were tested.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>Future climate scenarios projected substantial yield reductions, reaching up to 36 % under CF and 43 % under AWD in the 2080s under RCP 8.5. The difference between regimes was small under moderate scenarios but became more pronounced with extreme heat and water stress. Water productivity also declined sharply, with WUE dropping by up to 58 % and irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE) by 72 %. Nitrogen use efficiencies consistently decreased at higher application rates, though moderate N input (150–190 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>) with split applications sustained relatively better performance. AWD reduced irrigation water demand by 7–70 % compared with CF, but its yield advantage diminished under severe climate stress. Elevated CO₂ modestly improved efficiencies but could not counteract overall declines. Overall, these findings highlight that combining AWD with moderate nitrogen rates offers a practical pathway for sustaining rice production while conserving resources under changing climate conditions.</div></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><div>These findings provide evidence that combining AWD with moderate nitrogen inputs can guide policies and farm practices aimed at sustaining rice yields, conserving water, and improving input efficiency under a changing climate.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"231 ","pages":"Article 104540"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X2500280X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
CONTEXT
Evidence on how alternate wetting and drying (AWD) irrigation and nitrogen management together influence rice yield and resource efficiency under climate variability is still limited, yet such knowledge is critical for climate-smart agricultural planning. Climate change and inefficient agronomic practices increasingly threaten the sustainability of rice production systems by intensifying water scarcity and lowering nitrogen use efficiency (NUE).
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this study was to assess the combined effects of irrigation regimes, continuous flooding (CF) and AWD, and nitrogen application strategies on rice yield, nitrogen uptake, and resource use efficiency under projected climate change scenarios using the ORYZA (v3) model.
METHODS
The ORYZA (v3) crop growth model was used to simulate rice growth, water consumption (ET), irrigation water requirements (IR), water use efficiency (WUE) and nitrogen use efficiencies (NUE) under historical and future climate scenarios (RCP2.6 to RCP8.5). Two irrigation strategies: CF and AWD, and multiple nitrogen application schedules were tested.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS
Future climate scenarios projected substantial yield reductions, reaching up to 36 % under CF and 43 % under AWD in the 2080s under RCP 8.5. The difference between regimes was small under moderate scenarios but became more pronounced with extreme heat and water stress. Water productivity also declined sharply, with WUE dropping by up to 58 % and irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE) by 72 %. Nitrogen use efficiencies consistently decreased at higher application rates, though moderate N input (150–190 kg ha−1) with split applications sustained relatively better performance. AWD reduced irrigation water demand by 7–70 % compared with CF, but its yield advantage diminished under severe climate stress. Elevated CO₂ modestly improved efficiencies but could not counteract overall declines. Overall, these findings highlight that combining AWD with moderate nitrogen rates offers a practical pathway for sustaining rice production while conserving resources under changing climate conditions.
SIGNIFICANCE
These findings provide evidence that combining AWD with moderate nitrogen inputs can guide policies and farm practices aimed at sustaining rice yields, conserving water, and improving input efficiency under a changing climate.
期刊介绍:
Agricultural Systems is an international journal that deals with interactions - among the components of agricultural systems, among hierarchical levels of agricultural systems, between agricultural and other land use systems, and between agricultural systems and their natural, social and economic environments.
The scope includes the development and application of systems analysis methodologies in the following areas:
Systems approaches in the sustainable intensification of agriculture; pathways for sustainable intensification; crop-livestock integration; farm-level resource allocation; quantification of benefits and trade-offs at farm to landscape levels; integrative, participatory and dynamic modelling approaches for qualitative and quantitative assessments of agricultural systems and decision making;
The interactions between agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes; the multiple services of agricultural systems; food security and the environment;
Global change and adaptation science; transformational adaptations as driven by changes in climate, policy, values and attitudes influencing the design of farming systems;
Development and application of farming systems design tools and methods for impact, scenario and case study analysis; managing the complexities of dynamic agricultural systems; innovation systems and multi stakeholder arrangements that support or promote change and (or) inform policy decisions.