Integrated water and nitrogen management sustains rice yield and efficiency under changing climate scenarios

IF 6.2 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Agricultural Systems Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-25 DOI:10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104540
Fazli Hameed , Muhammad Mannan Afzal , Anis Ur Rehman Khalil , Junzeng Xu , Shah Fahad Rahim , Raheel Osman , Khalil Ahmad , Yongqiang Li , Tangyuan Ning
{"title":"Integrated water and nitrogen management sustains rice yield and efficiency under changing climate scenarios","authors":"Fazli Hameed ,&nbsp;Muhammad Mannan Afzal ,&nbsp;Anis Ur Rehman Khalil ,&nbsp;Junzeng Xu ,&nbsp;Shah Fahad Rahim ,&nbsp;Raheel Osman ,&nbsp;Khalil Ahmad ,&nbsp;Yongqiang Li ,&nbsp;Tangyuan Ning","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><div>Evidence on how alternate wetting and drying (AWD) irrigation and nitrogen management together influence rice yield and resource efficiency under climate variability is still limited, yet such knowledge is critical for climate-smart agricultural planning. Climate change and inefficient agronomic practices increasingly threaten the sustainability of rice production systems by intensifying water scarcity and lowering nitrogen use efficiency (NUE).</div></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>The objective of this study was to assess the combined effects of irrigation regimes, continuous flooding (CF) and AWD, and nitrogen application strategies on rice yield, nitrogen uptake, and resource use efficiency under projected climate change scenarios using the ORYZA (v3) model.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>The ORYZA (v<sub>3</sub>) crop growth model was used to simulate rice growth, water consumption (ET), irrigation water requirements (IR), water use efficiency (WUE) and nitrogen use efficiencies (NUE) under historical and future climate scenarios (RCP2.6 to RCP8.5). Two irrigation strategies: CF and AWD, and multiple nitrogen application schedules were tested.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>Future climate scenarios projected substantial yield reductions, reaching up to 36 % under CF and 43 % under AWD in the 2080s under RCP 8.5. The difference between regimes was small under moderate scenarios but became more pronounced with extreme heat and water stress. Water productivity also declined sharply, with WUE dropping by up to 58 % and irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE) by 72 %. Nitrogen use efficiencies consistently decreased at higher application rates, though moderate N input (150–190 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>) with split applications sustained relatively better performance. AWD reduced irrigation water demand by 7–70 % compared with CF, but its yield advantage diminished under severe climate stress. Elevated CO₂ modestly improved efficiencies but could not counteract overall declines. Overall, these findings highlight that combining AWD with moderate nitrogen rates offers a practical pathway for sustaining rice production while conserving resources under changing climate conditions.</div></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><div>These findings provide evidence that combining AWD with moderate nitrogen inputs can guide policies and farm practices aimed at sustaining rice yields, conserving water, and improving input efficiency under a changing climate.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"231 ","pages":"Article 104540"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X2500280X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

CONTEXT

Evidence on how alternate wetting and drying (AWD) irrigation and nitrogen management together influence rice yield and resource efficiency under climate variability is still limited, yet such knowledge is critical for climate-smart agricultural planning. Climate change and inefficient agronomic practices increasingly threaten the sustainability of rice production systems by intensifying water scarcity and lowering nitrogen use efficiency (NUE).

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess the combined effects of irrigation regimes, continuous flooding (CF) and AWD, and nitrogen application strategies on rice yield, nitrogen uptake, and resource use efficiency under projected climate change scenarios using the ORYZA (v3) model.

METHODS

The ORYZA (v3) crop growth model was used to simulate rice growth, water consumption (ET), irrigation water requirements (IR), water use efficiency (WUE) and nitrogen use efficiencies (NUE) under historical and future climate scenarios (RCP2.6 to RCP8.5). Two irrigation strategies: CF and AWD, and multiple nitrogen application schedules were tested.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Future climate scenarios projected substantial yield reductions, reaching up to 36 % under CF and 43 % under AWD in the 2080s under RCP 8.5. The difference between regimes was small under moderate scenarios but became more pronounced with extreme heat and water stress. Water productivity also declined sharply, with WUE dropping by up to 58 % and irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE) by 72 %. Nitrogen use efficiencies consistently decreased at higher application rates, though moderate N input (150–190 kg ha−1) with split applications sustained relatively better performance. AWD reduced irrigation water demand by 7–70 % compared with CF, but its yield advantage diminished under severe climate stress. Elevated CO₂ modestly improved efficiencies but could not counteract overall declines. Overall, these findings highlight that combining AWD with moderate nitrogen rates offers a practical pathway for sustaining rice production while conserving resources under changing climate conditions.

SIGNIFICANCE

These findings provide evidence that combining AWD with moderate nitrogen inputs can guide policies and farm practices aimed at sustaining rice yields, conserving water, and improving input efficiency under a changing climate.

Abstract Image

在不断变化的气候情景下,水氮综合管理可维持水稻产量和效率
在气候变率条件下,干湿交替灌溉和氮肥管理如何共同影响水稻产量和资源效率的证据仍然有限,但这些知识对于气候智能型农业规划至关重要。气候变化和低效的农艺做法加剧了水资源短缺,降低了氮素利用效率,从而日益威胁着水稻生产系统的可持续性。本研究的目的是利用ORYZA (v3)模型评估在预测的气候变化情景下,灌溉制度、连续淹水(CF)和连续淹水(AWD)以及施氮策略对水稻产量、氮吸收和资源利用效率的综合影响。方法采用ORYZA (v3)作物生长模型,模拟历史和未来气候情景(RCP2.6 ~ RCP8.5)下水稻生长、水分消耗(ET)、灌溉需水量(IR)、水分利用效率(WUE)和氮利用效率(NUE)。试验了CF和AWD两种灌溉策略和多种氮肥施用量。结果与结论未来气候情景预测,到2080年代,在RCP 8.5条件下,CF条件下产量将大幅下降36%,AWD条件下产量将下降43%。在温和的情况下,两种情况之间的差异很小,但在极端高温和缺水的情况下,差异变得更加明显。水分生产力也急剧下降,用水效率下降58%,灌溉用水效率(IWUE)下降72%。在较高的施氮量下,氮素利用效率持续下降,但中等施氮量(150-190 kg ha - 1)的分施能保持相对较好的表现。AWD比CF减少灌溉需水量7 ~ 70%,但在严重气候胁迫下产量优势减弱。二氧化碳浓度的升高适度地提高了效率,但不能抵消整体的下降。总之,这些发现突出表明,在气候变化条件下,将AWD与适度施氮结合为维持水稻生产同时节约资源提供了一条切实可行的途径。这些发现提供了证据,表明在气候变化条件下,将AWD与适度氮投入相结合可以指导旨在维持水稻产量、节约用水和提高投入效率的政策和农业实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agricultural Systems
Agricultural Systems 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
7.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: Agricultural Systems is an international journal that deals with interactions - among the components of agricultural systems, among hierarchical levels of agricultural systems, between agricultural and other land use systems, and between agricultural systems and their natural, social and economic environments. The scope includes the development and application of systems analysis methodologies in the following areas: Systems approaches in the sustainable intensification of agriculture; pathways for sustainable intensification; crop-livestock integration; farm-level resource allocation; quantification of benefits and trade-offs at farm to landscape levels; integrative, participatory and dynamic modelling approaches for qualitative and quantitative assessments of agricultural systems and decision making; The interactions between agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes; the multiple services of agricultural systems; food security and the environment; Global change and adaptation science; transformational adaptations as driven by changes in climate, policy, values and attitudes influencing the design of farming systems; Development and application of farming systems design tools and methods for impact, scenario and case study analysis; managing the complexities of dynamic agricultural systems; innovation systems and multi stakeholder arrangements that support or promote change and (or) inform policy decisions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书