Arvid Edén , Amanda Ahlin , Magnus Lindh , Johan Westin
{"title":"Detection of human herpesvirus type 6 DNA in cerebrospinal fluid is rarely clinically significant","authors":"Arvid Edén , Amanda Ahlin , Magnus Lindh , Johan Westin","doi":"10.1016/j.jcv.2025.105884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6) is included in syndromic panels for diagnostics of CNS infections, but the clinical significance of the detection is often unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To investigate the clinical importance of detectable HHV-6 DNA in CSF.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>We retrospectively investigated the clinical significance of detection of HHV-6 DNA in all clinical CSF samples that were analyzed between 2010 and 2021 using in-house PCR or the FilmArray meningitis/encephalitis (ME) panel. The clinical significance of HHV-6 was evaluated by review of electronic medical records (EMR) and categorized as unlikely, possible or likely for each case.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 8778 samples from 8222 individuals, HHV-6 DNA was detected in CSF in 113 (1.4 %). After EMR review, the clinical importance of HHV-6 was categorized as likely in three (3 %; including one with meningoencephalitis), possible in 15 (14 %) and unlikely in 95 (83 %) cases. No significant difference in HHV-6 DNA levels was seen between these categories. Seven of ten initiated antiviral therapies were unnecessary (integrated HHV-6 n = 4; primary infection without CNS complications n = 3).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In this large clinical sample, nearly all HHV-6 detections were either of unlikely diagnostic importance or did not require specific medical interventions. Moreover, in most cases where antiviral therapy was initiated, treatment was either erroneous (integration) or unmotivated (limited disease). These results indicate that the utility of including HHV-6 in routine syndromic diagnostic panels for CNS infections is questionable, and that appropriate guidance from the laboratory to aid attending clinicians is prudent to avoid unnecessary, expensive and potentially toxic therapy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15517,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Virology","volume":"181 ","pages":"Article 105884"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Virology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S138665322500126X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VIROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6) is included in syndromic panels for diagnostics of CNS infections, but the clinical significance of the detection is often unclear.
Objective
To investigate the clinical importance of detectable HHV-6 DNA in CSF.
Study design
We retrospectively investigated the clinical significance of detection of HHV-6 DNA in all clinical CSF samples that were analyzed between 2010 and 2021 using in-house PCR or the FilmArray meningitis/encephalitis (ME) panel. The clinical significance of HHV-6 was evaluated by review of electronic medical records (EMR) and categorized as unlikely, possible or likely for each case.
Results
Of 8778 samples from 8222 individuals, HHV-6 DNA was detected in CSF in 113 (1.4 %). After EMR review, the clinical importance of HHV-6 was categorized as likely in three (3 %; including one with meningoencephalitis), possible in 15 (14 %) and unlikely in 95 (83 %) cases. No significant difference in HHV-6 DNA levels was seen between these categories. Seven of ten initiated antiviral therapies were unnecessary (integrated HHV-6 n = 4; primary infection without CNS complications n = 3).
Conclusions
In this large clinical sample, nearly all HHV-6 detections were either of unlikely diagnostic importance or did not require specific medical interventions. Moreover, in most cases where antiviral therapy was initiated, treatment was either erroneous (integration) or unmotivated (limited disease). These results indicate that the utility of including HHV-6 in routine syndromic diagnostic panels for CNS infections is questionable, and that appropriate guidance from the laboratory to aid attending clinicians is prudent to avoid unnecessary, expensive and potentially toxic therapy.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Virology, an esteemed international publication, serves as the official journal for both the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology and The European Society for Clinical Virology. Dedicated to advancing the understanding of human virology in clinical settings, the Journal of Clinical Virology focuses on disseminating research papers and reviews pertaining to the clinical aspects of virology. Its scope encompasses articles discussing diagnostic methodologies and virus-induced clinical conditions, with an emphasis on practicality and relevance to clinical practice.
The journal publishes on topics that include:
• new diagnostic technologies
• nucleic acid amplification and serologic testing
• targeted and metagenomic next-generation sequencing
• emerging pandemic viral threats
• respiratory viruses
• transplant viruses
• chronic viral infections
• cancer-associated viruses
• gastrointestinal viruses
• central nervous system viruses
• one health (excludes animal health)