Detection of human herpesvirus type 6 DNA in cerebrospinal fluid is rarely clinically significant

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 VIROLOGY
Journal of Clinical Virology Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-24 DOI:10.1016/j.jcv.2025.105884
Arvid Edén , Amanda Ahlin , Magnus Lindh , Johan Westin
{"title":"Detection of human herpesvirus type 6 DNA in cerebrospinal fluid is rarely clinically significant","authors":"Arvid Edén ,&nbsp;Amanda Ahlin ,&nbsp;Magnus Lindh ,&nbsp;Johan Westin","doi":"10.1016/j.jcv.2025.105884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6) is included in syndromic panels for diagnostics of CNS infections, but the clinical significance of the detection is often unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To investigate the clinical importance of detectable HHV-6 DNA in CSF.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>We retrospectively investigated the clinical significance of detection of HHV-6 DNA in all clinical CSF samples that were analyzed between 2010 and 2021 using in-house PCR or the FilmArray meningitis/encephalitis (ME) panel. The clinical significance of HHV-6 was evaluated by review of electronic medical records (EMR) and categorized as unlikely, possible or likely for each case.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 8778 samples from 8222 individuals, HHV-6 DNA was detected in CSF in 113 (1.4 %). After EMR review, the clinical importance of HHV-6 was categorized as likely in three (3 %; including one with meningoencephalitis), possible in 15 (14 %) and unlikely in 95 (83 %) cases. No significant difference in HHV-6 DNA levels was seen between these categories. Seven of ten initiated antiviral therapies were unnecessary (integrated HHV-6 n = 4; primary infection without CNS complications n = 3).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In this large clinical sample, nearly all HHV-6 detections were either of unlikely diagnostic importance or did not require specific medical interventions. Moreover, in most cases where antiviral therapy was initiated, treatment was either erroneous (integration) or unmotivated (limited disease). These results indicate that the utility of including HHV-6 in routine syndromic diagnostic panels for CNS infections is questionable, and that appropriate guidance from the laboratory to aid attending clinicians is prudent to avoid unnecessary, expensive and potentially toxic therapy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15517,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Virology","volume":"181 ","pages":"Article 105884"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Virology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S138665322500126X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VIROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6) is included in syndromic panels for diagnostics of CNS infections, but the clinical significance of the detection is often unclear.

Objective

To investigate the clinical importance of detectable HHV-6 DNA in CSF.

Study design

We retrospectively investigated the clinical significance of detection of HHV-6 DNA in all clinical CSF samples that were analyzed between 2010 and 2021 using in-house PCR or the FilmArray meningitis/encephalitis (ME) panel. The clinical significance of HHV-6 was evaluated by review of electronic medical records (EMR) and categorized as unlikely, possible or likely for each case.

Results

Of 8778 samples from 8222 individuals, HHV-6 DNA was detected in CSF in 113 (1.4 %). After EMR review, the clinical importance of HHV-6 was categorized as likely in three (3 %; including one with meningoencephalitis), possible in 15 (14 %) and unlikely in 95 (83 %) cases. No significant difference in HHV-6 DNA levels was seen between these categories. Seven of ten initiated antiviral therapies were unnecessary (integrated HHV-6 n = 4; primary infection without CNS complications n = 3).

Conclusions

In this large clinical sample, nearly all HHV-6 detections were either of unlikely diagnostic importance or did not require specific medical interventions. Moreover, in most cases where antiviral therapy was initiated, treatment was either erroneous (integration) or unmotivated (limited disease). These results indicate that the utility of including HHV-6 in routine syndromic diagnostic panels for CNS infections is questionable, and that appropriate guidance from the laboratory to aid attending clinicians is prudent to avoid unnecessary, expensive and potentially toxic therapy.
脑脊液中人类疱疹病毒6型DNA的检测很少有临床意义
人类疱疹病毒6 (HHV-6)被包括在诊断中枢神经系统感染的综合征组中,但检测的临床意义往往不清楚。目的探讨脑脊液中检测HHV-6 DNA的临床意义。我们回顾性研究了2010年至2021年间使用内部PCR或FilmArray脑膜炎/脑炎(ME)面板分析的所有临床脑脊液样本中检测HHV-6 DNA的临床意义。通过电子病历(EMR)评估HHV-6的临床意义,并将每个病例分类为不太可能、可能或可能。结果8222人8778份脑脊液中检出HHV-6 DNA 113份(1.4 %)。在EMR审查后,HHV-6的临床重要性在3例(3 %,包括1例脑膜脑炎)中被分类为可能,在15例(14 %)中被分类为可能,在95例(83 %)中被分类为不可能。这些类别之间HHV-6 DNA水平无显著差异。10个初始抗病毒治疗中有7个是不必要的(综合HHV-6 n = 4;无中枢神经系统并发症的原发感染n = 3)。结论在这个大的临床样本中,几乎所有的HHV-6检测要么不太可能具有诊断重要性,要么不需要特殊的医疗干预。此外,在大多数开始抗病毒治疗的病例中,治疗要么是错误的(整合),要么是无动机的(有限的疾病)。这些结果表明,将HHV-6纳入中枢神经系统感染的常规综合征诊断小组的效用值得怀疑,并且实验室的适当指导可以帮助主治临床医生谨慎地避免不必要的、昂贵的和潜在毒性的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Virology
Journal of Clinical Virology 医学-病毒学
CiteScore
22.70
自引率
1.10%
发文量
149
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Virology, an esteemed international publication, serves as the official journal for both the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology and The European Society for Clinical Virology. Dedicated to advancing the understanding of human virology in clinical settings, the Journal of Clinical Virology focuses on disseminating research papers and reviews pertaining to the clinical aspects of virology. Its scope encompasses articles discussing diagnostic methodologies and virus-induced clinical conditions, with an emphasis on practicality and relevance to clinical practice. The journal publishes on topics that include: • new diagnostic technologies • nucleic acid amplification and serologic testing • targeted and metagenomic next-generation sequencing • emerging pandemic viral threats • respiratory viruses • transplant viruses • chronic viral infections • cancer-associated viruses • gastrointestinal viruses • central nervous system viruses • one health (excludes animal health)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书