Patient perceptions of recovery following surgical removal of an impacted mandibular third molar and application of advanced platelet-rich fibrin: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial
T. Starch-Jensen , R. Giordano , D.M. Alsadi , N.H. Bruun , L. Arendt-Nielsen
{"title":"Patient perceptions of recovery following surgical removal of an impacted mandibular third molar and application of advanced platelet-rich fibrin: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial","authors":"T. Starch-Jensen , R. Giordano , D.M. Alsadi , N.H. Bruun , L. Arendt-Nielsen","doi":"10.1016/j.ijom.2025.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The objective was to assess patient perceptions of recovery following surgical removal of mandibular third molar (SRM3) with application of advanced platelet-rich fibrin (A-PRF) (test) compared with SRM3 and no extraction socket intervention (control). Predictors of impaired convalescence were analysed. Eighty patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to test or control. A compulsory analgesic regimen was applied and the pain intensity before and after analgesic intake was recorded in a pain diary. Preoperative patient parameters, questionnaire results (OHIP-14, MDAS, SF-36, PASS-20), and the DMFT index were correlated with the numbers of days with pain and of sick leave. Postoperative assessments of the effects on work attendance, social and physical activities, sleep, speech, diet, and quality of life, as well as satisfaction with the treatment, were conducted after 30 days. The application of A-PRF within the extraction socket was not associated with a significant reduction in pain or in the number of days with pain (mean 8.7 vs 10.2 without A-PRF) or on sick leave (mean 1.3 vs 1.6 without A-PRF) (all <em>P</em> > 0.05). No significant difference was found for any of the outcomes. Preoperative employment status (employed) and the SF-36 ‘physical function’ domain score were found to be predictors of impaired convalescence. Routine application of A-PRF following SRM3 is, therefore, not recommended.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14332,"journal":{"name":"International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery","volume":"55 3","pages":"Pages 373-384"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0901502725014699","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The objective was to assess patient perceptions of recovery following surgical removal of mandibular third molar (SRM3) with application of advanced platelet-rich fibrin (A-PRF) (test) compared with SRM3 and no extraction socket intervention (control). Predictors of impaired convalescence were analysed. Eighty patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to test or control. A compulsory analgesic regimen was applied and the pain intensity before and after analgesic intake was recorded in a pain diary. Preoperative patient parameters, questionnaire results (OHIP-14, MDAS, SF-36, PASS-20), and the DMFT index were correlated with the numbers of days with pain and of sick leave. Postoperative assessments of the effects on work attendance, social and physical activities, sleep, speech, diet, and quality of life, as well as satisfaction with the treatment, were conducted after 30 days. The application of A-PRF within the extraction socket was not associated with a significant reduction in pain or in the number of days with pain (mean 8.7 vs 10.2 without A-PRF) or on sick leave (mean 1.3 vs 1.6 without A-PRF) (all P > 0.05). No significant difference was found for any of the outcomes. Preoperative employment status (employed) and the SF-36 ‘physical function’ domain score were found to be predictors of impaired convalescence. Routine application of A-PRF following SRM3 is, therefore, not recommended.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery is one of the leading journals in oral and maxillofacial surgery in the world. The Journal publishes papers of the highest scientific merit and widest possible scope on work in oral and maxillofacial surgery and supporting specialties.
The Journal is divided into sections, ensuring every aspect of oral and maxillofacial surgery is covered fully through a range of invited review articles, leading clinical and research articles, technical notes, abstracts, case reports and others. The sections include:
• Congenital and craniofacial deformities
• Orthognathic Surgery/Aesthetic facial surgery
• Trauma
• TMJ disorders
• Head and neck oncology
• Reconstructive surgery
• Implantology/Dentoalveolar surgery
• Clinical Pathology
• Oral Medicine
• Research and emerging technologies.