Patient perceptions of recovery following surgical removal of an impacted mandibular third molar and application of advanced platelet-rich fibrin: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
T. Starch-Jensen , R. Giordano , D.M. Alsadi , N.H. Bruun , L. Arendt-Nielsen
{"title":"Patient perceptions of recovery following surgical removal of an impacted mandibular third molar and application of advanced platelet-rich fibrin: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial","authors":"T. Starch-Jensen ,&nbsp;R. Giordano ,&nbsp;D.M. Alsadi ,&nbsp;N.H. Bruun ,&nbsp;L. Arendt-Nielsen","doi":"10.1016/j.ijom.2025.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The objective was to assess patient perceptions of recovery following surgical removal of mandibular third molar (SRM3) with application of advanced platelet-rich fibrin (A-PRF) (test) compared with SRM3 and no extraction socket intervention (control). Predictors of impaired convalescence were analysed. Eighty patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to test or control. A compulsory analgesic regimen was applied and the pain intensity before and after analgesic intake was recorded in a pain diary. Preoperative patient parameters, questionnaire results (OHIP-14, MDAS, SF-36, PASS-20), and the DMFT index were correlated with the numbers of days with pain and of sick leave. Postoperative assessments of the effects on work attendance, social and physical activities, sleep, speech, diet, and quality of life, as well as satisfaction with the treatment, were conducted after 30 days. The application of A-PRF within the extraction socket was not associated with a significant reduction in pain or in the number of days with pain (mean 8.7 vs 10.2 without A-PRF) or on sick leave (mean 1.3 vs 1.6 without A-PRF) (all <em>P</em> &gt; 0.05). No significant difference was found for any of the outcomes. Preoperative employment status (employed) and the SF-36 ‘physical function’ domain score were found to be predictors of impaired convalescence. Routine application of A-PRF following SRM3 is, therefore, not recommended.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14332,"journal":{"name":"International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery","volume":"55 3","pages":"Pages 373-384"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0901502725014699","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective was to assess patient perceptions of recovery following surgical removal of mandibular third molar (SRM3) with application of advanced platelet-rich fibrin (A-PRF) (test) compared with SRM3 and no extraction socket intervention (control). Predictors of impaired convalescence were analysed. Eighty patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to test or control. A compulsory analgesic regimen was applied and the pain intensity before and after analgesic intake was recorded in a pain diary. Preoperative patient parameters, questionnaire results (OHIP-14, MDAS, SF-36, PASS-20), and the DMFT index were correlated with the numbers of days with pain and of sick leave. Postoperative assessments of the effects on work attendance, social and physical activities, sleep, speech, diet, and quality of life, as well as satisfaction with the treatment, were conducted after 30 days. The application of A-PRF within the extraction socket was not associated with a significant reduction in pain or in the number of days with pain (mean 8.7 vs 10.2 without A-PRF) or on sick leave (mean 1.3 vs 1.6 without A-PRF) (all P > 0.05). No significant difference was found for any of the outcomes. Preoperative employment status (employed) and the SF-36 ‘physical function’ domain score were found to be predictors of impaired convalescence. Routine application of A-PRF following SRM3 is, therefore, not recommended.
患者对下颌第三磨牙手术切除后恢复的感知和高级富血小板纤维蛋白的应用:一项前瞻性随机对照临床试验。
目的是评估应用先进富血小板纤维蛋白(A-PRF)(测试)与SRM3和无拔牙槽干预(对照组)相比,下颌第三磨牙(SRM3)手术切除后患者的恢复感觉。分析康复受损的预测因素。80例患者随机(1:1)分为实验组和对照组。采用强制镇痛方案,镇痛前后的疼痛强度记录在疼痛日记中。术前患者参数、问卷调查结果(o嘻哈-14、MDAS、SF-36、PASS-20)和DMFT指数与疼痛天数和病假天数相关。术后30天后对工作出勤率、社交和身体活动、睡眠、言语、饮食、生活质量以及治疗满意度进行评估。在拔牙槽内应用a - prf与疼痛或疼痛天数(平均8.7 vs 10.2不使用a - prf)或病假(平均1.3 vs 1.6不使用a - prf)的显著减少无关(均P < 0.05)。没有发现任何结果有显著差异。术前就业状态(在职)和SF-36“身体功能”域评分被发现是康复受损的预测因子。因此,不建议在SRM3后常规应用A-PRF。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
318
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery is one of the leading journals in oral and maxillofacial surgery in the world. The Journal publishes papers of the highest scientific merit and widest possible scope on work in oral and maxillofacial surgery and supporting specialties. The Journal is divided into sections, ensuring every aspect of oral and maxillofacial surgery is covered fully through a range of invited review articles, leading clinical and research articles, technical notes, abstracts, case reports and others. The sections include: • Congenital and craniofacial deformities • Orthognathic Surgery/Aesthetic facial surgery • Trauma • TMJ disorders • Head and neck oncology • Reconstructive surgery • Implantology/Dentoalveolar surgery • Clinical Pathology • Oral Medicine • Research and emerging technologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书