Testing the ABCs of Serious Illness Program for Oncology Trainees: A Feasibility Trial Comparing Different Learning Formats for a Virtual Communication Curriculum.

IF 1.3 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Palliative medicine reports Pub Date : 2025-09-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26892820251376359
Oren Levine, Jeff Myers, Shilpa Jyothi Kumar, Daryl Bainbridge, Leah Steinberg, Nadia Incardona, Ghazaleh Kazemi, Hsien Seow
{"title":"Testing the ABCs of Serious Illness Program for Oncology Trainees: A Feasibility Trial Comparing Different Learning Formats for a Virtual Communication Curriculum.","authors":"Oren Levine, Jeff Myers, Shilpa Jyothi Kumar, Daryl Bainbridge, Leah Steinberg, Nadia Incardona, Ghazaleh Kazemi, Hsien Seow","doi":"10.1177/26892820251376359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>ABCs (All providers, Better Communication skills) of serious illness communication is a novel curriculum that could enhance postgraduate oncology training. The program combines electronic learning modules (ELMs), standardized patient (SP) encounters, and coaching, all in a virtual format. We assessed feasibility of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing different training experiences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a pilot for a RCT at three academic centers. Postgraduate oncology trainees were randomized to complete ELMs and SP encounters with coaching (intervention arm) versus ELMs only (control arm). Feasibility measures comprised the primary analysis. Secondary analyses explored the impact of different training experiences. Outcomes were measured through pre- and post-intervention simulation-based assessments (COM-ON rating scale), and surveys rating self-efficacy (End-of-Life Professional Caregiver Survey [EPCS] score) and satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three learners participated (37% recruitment). Adherence was 100% and data collection was near complete. All feasibility metrics were met except for the recruitment target of 75%. Self-efficacy ratings improved from baseline (EPCS score increased significantly (<i>p</i> < 0.001), mean paired difference = 0.73 (standard deviation [SD] = 0.78) [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.37-1.08]), as did quality of communication in simulations (COM-ON score increased significantly (<i>p</i> < 0.001), mean paired difference = 0.59 (SD = 0.73) [95% CI, 0.28-0.91]). Improvement was greatest in the intervention arm for both. Participants reported high satisfaction with virtual learning.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Recruitment was below target, but study activities were feasible in virtual format. The curriculum improved communication skills. The addition of virtual SPs and coaching optimized learning. The curriculum was associated with improved self-efficacy rating for serious illness communication with oncology patients. Lessons learned will support further medical education research in this area.</p>","PeriodicalId":74394,"journal":{"name":"Palliative medicine reports","volume":"6 1","pages":"436-445"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12543435/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative medicine reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26892820251376359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: ABCs (All providers, Better Communication skills) of serious illness communication is a novel curriculum that could enhance postgraduate oncology training. The program combines electronic learning modules (ELMs), standardized patient (SP) encounters, and coaching, all in a virtual format. We assessed feasibility of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing different training experiences.

Methods: We conducted a pilot for a RCT at three academic centers. Postgraduate oncology trainees were randomized to complete ELMs and SP encounters with coaching (intervention arm) versus ELMs only (control arm). Feasibility measures comprised the primary analysis. Secondary analyses explored the impact of different training experiences. Outcomes were measured through pre- and post-intervention simulation-based assessments (COM-ON rating scale), and surveys rating self-efficacy (End-of-Life Professional Caregiver Survey [EPCS] score) and satisfaction.

Results: Twenty-three learners participated (37% recruitment). Adherence was 100% and data collection was near complete. All feasibility metrics were met except for the recruitment target of 75%. Self-efficacy ratings improved from baseline (EPCS score increased significantly (p < 0.001), mean paired difference = 0.73 (standard deviation [SD] = 0.78) [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.37-1.08]), as did quality of communication in simulations (COM-ON score increased significantly (p < 0.001), mean paired difference = 0.59 (SD = 0.73) [95% CI, 0.28-0.91]). Improvement was greatest in the intervention arm for both. Participants reported high satisfaction with virtual learning.

Conclusions: Recruitment was below target, but study activities were feasible in virtual format. The curriculum improved communication skills. The addition of virtual SPs and coaching optimized learning. The curriculum was associated with improved self-efficacy rating for serious illness communication with oncology patients. Lessons learned will support further medical education research in this area.

肿瘤学培训生大病课程的基础知识测试:虚拟交流课程不同学习形式的可行性比较。
背景:ABCs (All providers, Better Communication skills)大病沟通是一门提高肿瘤研究生培养水平的新课程。该计划结合了电子学习模块(elm)、标准化患者(SP)接触和指导,所有这些都以虚拟形式进行。我们评估了比较不同训练经验的随机对照试验(RCT)的可行性。方法:我们在三个学术中心进行了一项随机对照试验。研究生肿瘤学学员被随机分为两组,一组在指导下完成elm和SP治疗(干预组),另一组仅完成elm治疗(对照组)。可行性措施包括初步分析。二次分析探讨了不同训练经历的影响。通过干预前和干预后基于模拟的评估(COM-ON评分量表)和自我效能感(临终专业护理者调查[EPCS]评分)和满意度的调查来测量结果。结果:共有23名学员参与,其中37%为学员。依从性为100%,数据收集接近完成。除75%的招聘目标外,所有可行性指标均得到满足。自我效能评分较基线有所改善(EPCS评分显著增加(p < 0.001),平均配对差异= 0.73(标准差[SD] = 0.78)[95%可信区间(CI), 0.37-1.08]),模拟中的沟通质量也有所改善(COM-ON评分显著增加(p < 0.001),平均配对差异= 0.59 (SD = 0.73) [95% CI, 0.28-0.91])。两者的改善在干预组都是最大的。参与者对虚拟学习的满意度很高。结论:招聘低于目标,但虚拟形式的学习活动是可行的。课程提高了沟通技巧。虚拟sp和教练的加入优化了学习。该课程与与肿瘤患者进行严重疾病沟通的自我效能评分的提高有关。所吸取的经验教训将支持这一领域的进一步医学教育研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书