Checklist-Based Identification of Adverse Drug Reactions in Emergency Department Patients.

Benjamin J Hellinger, Thilo Bertsche, Yvonne Remane, André Gries
{"title":"Checklist-Based Identification of Adverse Drug Reactions in Emergency Department Patients.","authors":"Benjamin J Hellinger, Thilo Bertsche, Yvonne Remane, André Gries","doi":"10.3390/medicines12040025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Patients presenting at the emergency department (ED) have a wide variety of complaints. In some of those patients a possible reason for their complaints might be an adverse drug reaction (ADR). An appropriate identification of ADR in this setting is required to optimize drug therapy and to prevent serious harm deriving from an overlooked ADR. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective study assessed medical records of patients for ADR as a reason for the ED presentation in two assessments. In the first assessment, medical records were evaluated for potential ADR leading to ED presentation with a predefined checklist by an examiner not involved in initial patient treatment. In the second assessment the same medical records were assessed for ADR identified by the physician in the initial patient presentation. Discrepancies in identified ADR were compared. For descriptive data analysis and statistical evaluation, the McNemar test was performed. <b>Results:</b> From 35,333 patients admitted to the ED, full data were available from 34,747 patients for evaluation. In those patients, 2071 (6.0%) ADR were identified as being the reason for ED presentation by using the checklist. In 828 (2.4%) patients, emergency department physicians had documented an ADR in the medical records. By using the checklist, ADR identification could be improved significantly as compared to routine care, at 6.0% vs. 2.4%, respectively (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The most common chief complaint in patients with an ADR was worsened general condition. Most common drug class causing ADR were antithrombotics. <b>Conclusions</b>: ADR seem to be overlooked in routine care since a significantly higher number of ADR were found by using a checklist-based method as compared to ADR documented as part of routine examination. Therefore, implementing the checklist in the routine process might improve ADR identification.</p>","PeriodicalId":74162,"journal":{"name":"Medicines (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":"12 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12551126/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicines (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/medicines12040025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients presenting at the emergency department (ED) have a wide variety of complaints. In some of those patients a possible reason for their complaints might be an adverse drug reaction (ADR). An appropriate identification of ADR in this setting is required to optimize drug therapy and to prevent serious harm deriving from an overlooked ADR. Methods: This retrospective study assessed medical records of patients for ADR as a reason for the ED presentation in two assessments. In the first assessment, medical records were evaluated for potential ADR leading to ED presentation with a predefined checklist by an examiner not involved in initial patient treatment. In the second assessment the same medical records were assessed for ADR identified by the physician in the initial patient presentation. Discrepancies in identified ADR were compared. For descriptive data analysis and statistical evaluation, the McNemar test was performed. Results: From 35,333 patients admitted to the ED, full data were available from 34,747 patients for evaluation. In those patients, 2071 (6.0%) ADR were identified as being the reason for ED presentation by using the checklist. In 828 (2.4%) patients, emergency department physicians had documented an ADR in the medical records. By using the checklist, ADR identification could be improved significantly as compared to routine care, at 6.0% vs. 2.4%, respectively (p < 0.001). The most common chief complaint in patients with an ADR was worsened general condition. Most common drug class causing ADR were antithrombotics. Conclusions: ADR seem to be overlooked in routine care since a significantly higher number of ADR were found by using a checklist-based method as compared to ADR documented as part of routine examination. Therefore, implementing the checklist in the routine process might improve ADR identification.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基于核对表的急诊科患者药物不良反应识别。
背景:急诊科(ED)的患者有各种各样的主诉。在其中一些患者中,他们抱怨的可能原因可能是药物不良反应(ADR)。在这种情况下,需要对ADR进行适当的识别,以优化药物治疗,并防止因忽视ADR而造成严重伤害。方法:本回顾性研究在两项评估中评估了患者的医疗记录,以ADR作为ED表现的原因。在第一次评估中,医疗记录被评估为潜在的不良反应导致ED的表现,由一名未参与初始患者治疗的审查员预先确定的清单。在第二次评估中,对相同的医疗记录进行了评估,以确定医生在初次患者就诊时发现的不良反应。比较确定的不良反应差异。描述性数据分析和统计评价采用McNemar检验。结果:在35,333例入住急诊科的患者中,有34,747例患者的完整数据可供评估。在这些患者中,2071例(6.0%)不良反应被确定为ED表现的原因。在828例(2.4%)患者中,急诊科医生在医疗记录中记录了不良反应。与常规护理相比,使用清单可显著提高不良反应的识别率,分别为6.0%和2.4% (p < 0.001)。不良反应患者最常见的主诉是一般情况恶化。引起不良反应最常见的药物类别是抗血栓药。结论:ADR似乎在常规护理中被忽视,因为与常规检查记录的ADR相比,使用基于清单的方法发现的ADR数量要高得多。因此,在日常流程中实施清单可以提高ADR的识别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书