Clinical Validation of the SECONDs Tool for Evaluating Disorders of Consciousness in Argentina.

IF 2 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
NeuroSci Pub Date : 2025-10-07 DOI:10.3390/neurosci6040100
María Julieta Russo, María de la Paz Sampayo, Paula Arias, Vanina García, Yanina Gambero, Mariano Maiarú, Florencia Deschle, Hernán Pavón
{"title":"Clinical Validation of the SECONDs Tool for Evaluating Disorders of Consciousness in Argentina.","authors":"María Julieta Russo, María de la Paz Sampayo, Paula Arias, Vanina García, Yanina Gambero, Mariano Maiarú, Florencia Deschle, Hernán Pavón","doi":"10.3390/neurosci6040100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) is the gold standard for diagnosing chronic disorders of consciousness (DoC); however, its clinical utility is limited by lengthy administration and the need for specialized training. The Simplified Evaluation of Disorders of Consciousness (SECONDs) provides a faster and more user-friendly alternative.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Argentine adaptation of the SECONDs scale in adults with chronic DoC due to acquired brain injury.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-nine patients were evaluated over two consecutive days by three blinded raters. On day one, rater A administered the SECONDs (A1) and rater B administered the CRS-R (B) to assess concurrent validity. On day two, rater A repeated the SECONDs (A2), and rater C performed an additional SECONDs assessment (C), permitting evaluation of intra-rater (A1 vs. A2) and inter-rater (A vs. C) reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SECONDs demonstrated excellent intra-rater (ICC = 0.98) and inter-rater (ICC = 0.86) reliability. Concurrent validity with the CRS-R was strong (r = 0.73, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Diagnostic agreement was high between A1 and B (κ = 0.75) and between both A1-A2 and A1-C (κ = 0.82). The median administration time was significantly shorter for the SECONDs (10 vs. 15 min; <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Argentine SECONDs is a valid, reliable, and efficient tool for the clinical assessment of DoC patients in rehabilitation settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":74294,"journal":{"name":"NeuroSci","volume":"6 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12551119/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NeuroSci","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/neurosci6040100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) is the gold standard for diagnosing chronic disorders of consciousness (DoC); however, its clinical utility is limited by lengthy administration and the need for specialized training. The Simplified Evaluation of Disorders of Consciousness (SECONDs) provides a faster and more user-friendly alternative.

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Argentine adaptation of the SECONDs scale in adults with chronic DoC due to acquired brain injury.

Methods: Twenty-nine patients were evaluated over two consecutive days by three blinded raters. On day one, rater A administered the SECONDs (A1) and rater B administered the CRS-R (B) to assess concurrent validity. On day two, rater A repeated the SECONDs (A2), and rater C performed an additional SECONDs assessment (C), permitting evaluation of intra-rater (A1 vs. A2) and inter-rater (A vs. C) reliability.

Results: The SECONDs demonstrated excellent intra-rater (ICC = 0.98) and inter-rater (ICC = 0.86) reliability. Concurrent validity with the CRS-R was strong (r = 0.73, p < 0.001). Diagnostic agreement was high between A1 and B (κ = 0.75) and between both A1-A2 and A1-C (κ = 0.82). The median administration time was significantly shorter for the SECONDs (10 vs. 15 min; p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The Argentine SECONDs is a valid, reliable, and efficient tool for the clinical assessment of DoC patients in rehabilitation settings.

评估阿根廷意识障碍的SECONDs工具的临床验证。
背景:昏迷恢复量表修订版(CRS-R)是诊断慢性意识障碍(DoC)的金标准;然而,它的临床应用受到冗长的管理和需要专门培训的限制。简化的评估意识障碍(秒)提供了一个更快,更用户友好的选择。目的:本研究旨在评估阿根廷适应性秒量表在成人后发性脑损伤慢性DoC中的效度和信度。方法:29例患者在连续2天内由3名盲法评分者进行评估。第一天,评定者A进行秒量表(A1),评定者B进行CRS-R量表(B)评估并发效度。第二天,评价者A重复了SECONDs (A2),评价者C进行了额外的SECONDs评估(C),允许评估评价者内部(A1 vs. A2)和评价者之间(A vs. C)的可靠性。结果:秒量表具有良好的评分者内(ICC = 0.98)和评分者间(ICC = 0.86)信度。与CRS-R的并发效度较强(r = 0.73, p < 0.001)。A1与B的诊断一致性较高(κ = 0.75), A1- a2与A1- c的诊断一致性较高(κ = 0.82)。秒组的中位给药时间显著缩短(10分钟vs 15分钟;p < 0.001)。结论:阿根廷秒是一种有效、可靠、高效的康复环境中临床评估DoC患者的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信