The Effect of Bio-Banded Game Formats on Physiological, Physical, Technical, and Tactical Parameters in Youth Soccer-A Systematic Review.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 PEDIATRICS
Pediatric Exercise Science Pub Date : 2025-10-22 Print Date: 2026-05-01 DOI:10.1123/pes.2024-0152
Johannes Jäger, Michael Rumpf, Matthias Lochmann
{"title":"The Effect of Bio-Banded Game Formats on Physiological, Physical, Technical, and Tactical Parameters in Youth Soccer-A Systematic Review.","authors":"Johannes Jäger, Michael Rumpf, Matthias Lochmann","doi":"10.1123/pes.2024-0152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Given the growing interest in Bio-Banding (BB) game formats, this review aimed to investigate its effects on physiological, physical, technical, and tactical parameters in youth soccer players.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted across 5 databases: Google Scholar, PubMed, ScienceDirect, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science. Studies with experimental or observational designs assessing the effects of BB formats on these parameters were included. The quality of the studies was evaluated using the version 2 of the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions tools for quantitative studies and the Critical Appraisal Tool by the Johanna Briggs Institute for qualitative studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten studies (n = 591 players) were included, with 8 employing quantitative methods and 2 utilizing qualitative approaches. The results revealed variability in study designs, limiting cross-study comparability. Physical demands and physiological responses differed across maturational groups and game formats, while technical and tactical behaviors adapted to BB formats particularly for early and late-maturing players. Despite observed differences between BB and comparator games, conclusive evidence on BB's effectiveness is lacking due to methodological limitations and bias risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BB presents a promising approach to support player development and mitigate maturity-related selection bias. Further research is needed to deepen our understanding of BB-implementations in youth soccer.</p>","PeriodicalId":49712,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Exercise Science","volume":" ","pages":"224-235"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Exercise Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/pes.2024-0152","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Given the growing interest in Bio-Banding (BB) game formats, this review aimed to investigate its effects on physiological, physical, technical, and tactical parameters in youth soccer players.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted across 5 databases: Google Scholar, PubMed, ScienceDirect, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science. Studies with experimental or observational designs assessing the effects of BB formats on these parameters were included. The quality of the studies was evaluated using the version 2 of the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions tools for quantitative studies and the Critical Appraisal Tool by the Johanna Briggs Institute for qualitative studies.

Results: Ten studies (n = 591 players) were included, with 8 employing quantitative methods and 2 utilizing qualitative approaches. The results revealed variability in study designs, limiting cross-study comparability. Physical demands and physiological responses differed across maturational groups and game formats, while technical and tactical behaviors adapted to BB formats particularly for early and late-maturing players. Despite observed differences between BB and comparator games, conclusive evidence on BB's effectiveness is lacking due to methodological limitations and bias risk.

Conclusion: BB presents a promising approach to support player development and mitigate maturity-related selection bias. Further research is needed to deepen our understanding of BB-implementations in youth soccer.

生物带状比赛形式对青少年足球生理、身体、技术和战术参数的影响——系统综述。
目的:鉴于人们对生物带球(BB)比赛形式的兴趣日益浓厚,本综述旨在探讨其对青少年足球运动员生理、身体、技术和战术参数的影响。方法:系统检索5个数据库:谷歌Scholar、PubMed、ScienceDirect、SPORTDiscus和Web of Science。采用实验或观察设计的研究评估了BB格式对这些参数的影响。研究的质量评估使用Cochrane风险偏倚工具和Cochrane非随机干预研究风险偏倚工具的第2版,定量研究工具和约翰娜布里格斯研究所的关键评估工具进行定性研究。结果:纳入10项研究(n = 591名运动员),其中8项采用定量方法,2项采用定性方法。结果揭示了研究设计的可变性,限制了交叉研究的可比性。生理需求和生理反应在不同的成熟群体和游戏模式中有所不同,而技术和战术行为则适合于BB模式,特别是对于早熟和晚熟的玩家。尽管观察到BB和比较游戏之间存在差异,但由于方法限制和偏见风险,缺乏关于BB有效性的结论性证据。结论:BB提供了一种支持玩家发展和减轻与成熟度相关的选择偏差的有效方法。需要进一步的研究来加深我们对青少年足球实施bb的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Exercise Science
Pediatric Exercise Science 医学-生理学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Exercise Science is a journal committed to enriching the scientific knowledge of exercise during childhood and adolescence. To this end it publishes information that contributes to an understanding of (a) the unique aspects of the physiologic, physical, biochemical, and psychologic responses of children to exercise, (b) the role of exercise in the treatment of pediatric chronic diseases, (c) the importance of physical activity in the prevention of illness and preservation of wellness, and (d) the means by which participation in sports may be made safer and more enjoyable for children and youth. Consideration will be given for publication of work by various methodologies consistent with the scientific approach. Besides original research, the journal includes review articles, abstracts from other journals, book reviews, and editorial comments. Pediatric Exercise Science encourages the expression of conflicting opinions regarding children and exercise by providing a forum for alternative viewpoints. At the same time it serves as a means of accumulating a base of research information that will allow application of experimental data to clinical practice. The scientific disciplines contributing to this body of knowledge are diverse. Therefore it is the purpose of this journal to provide a common focus for disseminating advances in the science of exercise during childhood. In doing so, the journal allows the opportunity for cross-fertilization of ideas between disciplines that will potentiate the growth of knowledge in this field. Pediatric Exercise Science seeks to stimulate new ideas regarding exercise in children and to increase the awareness of scientists, health care providers, and physical educators of the importance of exercise during childhood.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书