A biopsychosocial content analysis of Dutch rehabilitation and anaesthesiology websites for patients with non-specific neck, back, and chronic pain.

IF 1.6 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Scandinavian Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2025-10-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1515/sjpain-2025-0009
Verena M D Jongeleen, Maarten A Heikens, Lotte R Bakker, Roland R Reezigt, Henrica R Schiphorst Preuper, André P Wolff, Michiel F Reneman
{"title":"A biopsychosocial content analysis of Dutch rehabilitation and anaesthesiology websites for patients with non-specific neck, back, and chronic pain.","authors":"Verena M D Jongeleen, Maarten A Heikens, Lotte R Bakker, Roland R Reezigt, Henrica R Schiphorst Preuper, André P Wolff, Michiel F Reneman","doi":"10.1515/sjpain-2025-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Patients with non-specific neck, back, and/or chronic pain increasingly seek information about their condition on websites of healthcare practitioners. This information can influence their treatment expectation and should align with contemporary biopsychosocial (BPS) understanding of pain. It is unclear whether Dutch websites in the fields of rehabilitation and anaesthesiology align with the BPS model. The aim of this study is to assess the BPS content about non-specific neck, back, and chronic pain in Dutch rehabilitation and anaesthesiology websites.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All Dutch rehabilitation and anaesthesiology webpages were potentially eligible for inclusion. All webpages focusing on the topics of neck, back, and chronic pain were included. BPS content analyses were performed according to a standardised rating method with criteria for biomedical, limited-, and reasonably BPS. Analyses were performed separately for specialisms, and for the three topics. Additionally, frequency of nocebo words usage on the websites is explored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 71 webpages were included, of which 42 (59.2%) were rehabilitation, 28 (39.4%) were anaesthesiology webpages, and 1 webpage described both. Across all webpages, 7 (9.7%) were rated as biomedical, 54 (75.0%) limited BPS, and 11 (15.3%) reasonably BPS. Differences between specialisms were not significantly different (<i>p</i> = 0.055). Differences between BPS ratings and the topics were significant (<i>p</i> = 0.005). Nocebos were present on 22.2% (<i>n</i> = 16) of the webpages.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Majority of the anaesthesiology and rehabilitation webpages (84.7%) did not achieve a \"reasonable biopsychosocial\" rate. Improvements are particularly needed in describing pain as a universal and/or normal phenomenon experienced by most individuals, as well as in explaining how an individual's environment influences their thoughts, emotions, and behaviours regarding pain perception.</p>","PeriodicalId":47407,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Pain","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/sjpain-2025-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Patients with non-specific neck, back, and/or chronic pain increasingly seek information about their condition on websites of healthcare practitioners. This information can influence their treatment expectation and should align with contemporary biopsychosocial (BPS) understanding of pain. It is unclear whether Dutch websites in the fields of rehabilitation and anaesthesiology align with the BPS model. The aim of this study is to assess the BPS content about non-specific neck, back, and chronic pain in Dutch rehabilitation and anaesthesiology websites.

Methods: All Dutch rehabilitation and anaesthesiology webpages were potentially eligible for inclusion. All webpages focusing on the topics of neck, back, and chronic pain were included. BPS content analyses were performed according to a standardised rating method with criteria for biomedical, limited-, and reasonably BPS. Analyses were performed separately for specialisms, and for the three topics. Additionally, frequency of nocebo words usage on the websites is explored.

Results: A total of 71 webpages were included, of which 42 (59.2%) were rehabilitation, 28 (39.4%) were anaesthesiology webpages, and 1 webpage described both. Across all webpages, 7 (9.7%) were rated as biomedical, 54 (75.0%) limited BPS, and 11 (15.3%) reasonably BPS. Differences between specialisms were not significantly different (p = 0.055). Differences between BPS ratings and the topics were significant (p = 0.005). Nocebos were present on 22.2% (n = 16) of the webpages.

Conclusion: Majority of the anaesthesiology and rehabilitation webpages (84.7%) did not achieve a "reasonable biopsychosocial" rate. Improvements are particularly needed in describing pain as a universal and/or normal phenomenon experienced by most individuals, as well as in explaining how an individual's environment influences their thoughts, emotions, and behaviours regarding pain perception.

荷兰非特异性颈部、背部和慢性疼痛患者康复和麻醉学网站的生物心理社会内容分析。
目的:患有非特异性颈部、背部和/或慢性疼痛的患者越来越多地在医疗保健从业者的网站上寻求有关其病情的信息。这些信息可以影响他们的治疗预期,并应与当代生物心理社会(BPS)对疼痛的理解保持一致。目前尚不清楚荷兰康复和麻醉学领域的网站是否与BPS模式一致。本研究的目的是评估荷兰康复和麻醉网站中关于非特异性颈部、背部和慢性疼痛的BPS内容。方法:所有荷兰康复和麻醉学网页都可能符合纳入标准。所有以颈部、背部和慢性疼痛为主题的网页都被包括在内。根据生物医学、有限和合理BPS标准的标准化评分方法进行BPS含量分析。对专业和三个主题分别进行分析。此外,还探讨了反安慰剂词在网站上的使用频率。结果:共纳入71个网页,其中康复类网页42个(59.2%),麻醉学类网页28个(39.4%),麻醉学和康复类网页各1个。在所有网页中,7个(9.7%)被评为生物医学,54个(75.0%)被评为有限BPS, 11个(15.3%)被评为合理BPS。专科间差异无统计学意义(p = 0.055)。BPS评分与主题之间的差异具有显著性(p = 0.005)。反安慰剂出现在22.2% (n = 16)的网页上。结论:绝大多数麻醉康复网页(84.7%)没有达到“合理的生物心理社会”率。尤其需要改进的是将疼痛描述为大多数个体所经历的普遍和/或正常现象,以及解释个体的环境如何影响他们关于疼痛感知的思想、情绪和行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Pain
Scandinavian Journal of Pain CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
73
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书