The Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Acute Ischemic Stroke-A Randomized, Double-blind, Sham-Controlled Study.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Seong-Hoon Kim, Taewon Kim, Jaseong Koo, Okjin Park, Hyeonseok Jeong, In-Uk Song
{"title":"The Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Acute Ischemic Stroke-A Randomized, Double-blind, Sham-Controlled Study.","authors":"Seong-Hoon Kim, Taewon Kim, Jaseong Koo, Okjin Park, Hyeonseok Jeong, In-Uk Song","doi":"10.1097/NRL.0000000000000643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a noninvasive neuromodulation technique that has shown potential in enhancing motor recovery and cognitive function in chronic stroke patients. However, the application of tDCS in the acute setting of ischemic stroke remains largely unexplored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study enrolled 60 acute ischemic stroke patients within 2 days of onset. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either real tDCS or sham stimulation for 5 sessions over 7 days. The primary outcomes were changes in the Fugl-Meyer (FM) motor scale, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores, incidence of early neurological deterioration, and favorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale ≤2) at 3 months poststroke.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Early neurological deterioration occurred in 6.7% of the tDCS group and 26.7% of the sham group, but this difference did not reach statistical significance ( P =0.065). No significant differences were observed between the tDCS and sham groups in terms of FM scores, NIHSS scores, or favorable functional outcomes at 3 months. No significant group-by-time interactions were found for FM scores ( P =0.481) or NIHSS scores ( P =0.157).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates that tDCS can be safely administered in the acute phase of ischemic stroke. While no significant effects on motor function or neurological outcomes were observed compared with sham stimulation, the trend toward reduced early neurological deterioration warrants further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":49758,"journal":{"name":"Neurologist","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NRL.0000000000000643","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a noninvasive neuromodulation technique that has shown potential in enhancing motor recovery and cognitive function in chronic stroke patients. However, the application of tDCS in the acute setting of ischemic stroke remains largely unexplored.

Methods: This randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study enrolled 60 acute ischemic stroke patients within 2 days of onset. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either real tDCS or sham stimulation for 5 sessions over 7 days. The primary outcomes were changes in the Fugl-Meyer (FM) motor scale, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores, incidence of early neurological deterioration, and favorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale ≤2) at 3 months poststroke.

Results: Early neurological deterioration occurred in 6.7% of the tDCS group and 26.7% of the sham group, but this difference did not reach statistical significance ( P =0.065). No significant differences were observed between the tDCS and sham groups in terms of FM scores, NIHSS scores, or favorable functional outcomes at 3 months. No significant group-by-time interactions were found for FM scores ( P =0.481) or NIHSS scores ( P =0.157).

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that tDCS can be safely administered in the acute phase of ischemic stroke. While no significant effects on motor function or neurological outcomes were observed compared with sham stimulation, the trend toward reduced early neurological deterioration warrants further investigation.

经颅直流电刺激对急性缺血性脑卒中的影响——一项随机、双盲、假对照研究。
目的:经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)是一种非侵入性的神经调节技术,在促进慢性脑卒中患者的运动恢复和认知功能方面显示出潜力。然而,tDCS在急性缺血性脑卒中中的应用在很大程度上仍未被探索。方法:这项随机、双盲、假对照的研究纳入了60例发病2天内的急性缺血性脑卒中患者。参与者被随机分配接受真实的tDCS或假刺激,为期7天,共5次。主要结局是Fugl-Meyer (FM)运动量表、美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分的变化、早期神经功能恶化的发生率以及卒中后3个月良好的功能结局(改良Rankin量表≤2)。结果:tDCS组出现神经功能早期恶化的比例为6.7%,假手术组为26.7%,但差异无统计学意义(P=0.065)。在3个月时,tDCS组和假手术组在FM评分、NIHSS评分或有利的功能结局方面没有观察到显著差异。FM评分(P=0.481)和NIHSS评分(P=0.157)未发现显著的组-时间交互作用。结论:本研究表明tDCS可安全用于缺血性脑卒中急性期。虽然与假刺激相比,未观察到对运动功能或神经预后的显著影响,但减少早期神经退化的趋势值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurologist
Neurologist 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Neurologist publishes articles on topics of current interest to physicians treating patients with neurological diseases. The core of the journal is review articles focusing on clinically relevant issues. The journal also publishes case reports or case series which review the literature and put observations in perspective, as well as letters to the editor. Special features include the popular "10 Most Commonly Asked Questions" and the "Patient and Family Fact Sheet," a handy tear-out page that can be copied to hand out to patients and their caregivers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书