Persistent severe pain following groin hernia repair: Somatosensory profiles, pain trajectories, and clinical outcomes - Synopsis of a PhD thesis.

IF 1.6 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Scandinavian Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2025-10-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1515/sjpain-2025-0010
Elisabeth Kjær Jensen, Mads U Werner
{"title":"Persistent severe pain following groin hernia repair: Somatosensory profiles, pain trajectories, and clinical outcomes - Synopsis of a PhD thesis.","authors":"Elisabeth Kjær Jensen, Mads U Werner","doi":"10.1515/sjpain-2025-0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Persistent severe intensity pain after groin hernia repair (PSPG; 200-400/10,000 repairs) is a significant surgical complication impacting the activity of daily living (ADL) and psychosocial functioning. This PhD synopsis presents an outline and a summary of three clinical studies examining outcomes and pathophysiology behind the post-surgical pain state.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The studies assessed (I) treatment outcomes, i.e., re-surgery with meshectomy and selective neurectomy vs pharmacotherapy, (II) temporal trajectories of pain intensity following the primary repair, and (III) somatosensory profiles before and after re-surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>On a national basis, patients experiencing PSPG (>3 months) with an activity-related or maximal pain intensity >7 (NRS; 0-10) referred to our unit were examined. Validated questionnaires classifying NRS, ADL functions, and psychometrics, and standardized quantitative sensory testing assessing somatosensory phenotypes were used. Study I was a prospective, questionnaire-based cohort analysis comparing outcomes from a 5-year perspective. Study II retrospectively examined patient-reported pain intensity trajectories. Study III followed somatosensory outcomes before and after re-surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Study I (responder ratio: 172/204 [84%]), patients were allocated to re-surgery (<i>n</i> = 54) or to pharmacotherapy (<i>n</i> = 118). Compared to baseline, both cohorts showed significant improvements in pain intensity and ADL functions (<i>P</i> < 0.0001), with a slight superiority in ADL functions for the re-surgical cohort (<i>P</i> = 0.02). The number needed to operate for one patient to achieve a positive outcome (≥25% change in NRS/ADL) ranged between 1.5 and 1.9, and for experiencing a negative outcome, between 14 and 28. Study II (<i>n</i> = 95) identified two main prototypes of post-surgical pain intensity trajectories, where 51% experienced undiminished pain after the primary repair, while 29% experienced normal post-surgical recovery followed by late development of PSPG. Study III (<i>n</i> = 60) indicated that re-surgery was associated with a loss in the cutaneous somatosensory function and deep mechanical nociceptive function (decrease in evoked pain sensitivity).</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The thesis corroborates that both re-surgical intervention and pharmacotherapy may ameliorate high-intensity pain and increase ADL functions in PSPG. Since the study design cannot account for non-specific therapeutic effects, a high-quality RCT is still needed. The pathophysiologic results indicate that the implanted mesh acts as a \"pain generator\", and future research should be targeted at dampening the immuno-inflammatory response to the implanted mesh.</p>","PeriodicalId":47407,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Pain","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/sjpain-2025-0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Persistent severe intensity pain after groin hernia repair (PSPG; 200-400/10,000 repairs) is a significant surgical complication impacting the activity of daily living (ADL) and psychosocial functioning. This PhD synopsis presents an outline and a summary of three clinical studies examining outcomes and pathophysiology behind the post-surgical pain state.

Objective: The studies assessed (I) treatment outcomes, i.e., re-surgery with meshectomy and selective neurectomy vs pharmacotherapy, (II) temporal trajectories of pain intensity following the primary repair, and (III) somatosensory profiles before and after re-surgery.

Methods: On a national basis, patients experiencing PSPG (>3 months) with an activity-related or maximal pain intensity >7 (NRS; 0-10) referred to our unit were examined. Validated questionnaires classifying NRS, ADL functions, and psychometrics, and standardized quantitative sensory testing assessing somatosensory phenotypes were used. Study I was a prospective, questionnaire-based cohort analysis comparing outcomes from a 5-year perspective. Study II retrospectively examined patient-reported pain intensity trajectories. Study III followed somatosensory outcomes before and after re-surgery.

Results: In Study I (responder ratio: 172/204 [84%]), patients were allocated to re-surgery (n = 54) or to pharmacotherapy (n = 118). Compared to baseline, both cohorts showed significant improvements in pain intensity and ADL functions (P < 0.0001), with a slight superiority in ADL functions for the re-surgical cohort (P = 0.02). The number needed to operate for one patient to achieve a positive outcome (≥25% change in NRS/ADL) ranged between 1.5 and 1.9, and for experiencing a negative outcome, between 14 and 28. Study II (n = 95) identified two main prototypes of post-surgical pain intensity trajectories, where 51% experienced undiminished pain after the primary repair, while 29% experienced normal post-surgical recovery followed by late development of PSPG. Study III (n = 60) indicated that re-surgery was associated with a loss in the cutaneous somatosensory function and deep mechanical nociceptive function (decrease in evoked pain sensitivity).

Summary: The thesis corroborates that both re-surgical intervention and pharmacotherapy may ameliorate high-intensity pain and increase ADL functions in PSPG. Since the study design cannot account for non-specific therapeutic effects, a high-quality RCT is still needed. The pathophysiologic results indicate that the implanted mesh acts as a "pain generator", and future research should be targeted at dampening the immuno-inflammatory response to the implanted mesh.

腹股沟疝修复后的持续剧烈疼痛:体感特征,疼痛轨迹和临床结果-博士论文摘要。
背景:腹股沟疝修补术后持续剧烈疼痛(PSPG; 200-400/10,000修补)是影响日常生活活动(ADL)和心理社会功能的重要手术并发症。这篇博士摘要介绍了三个临床研究的大纲和总结,检查了手术后疼痛状态背后的结果和病理生理学。目的:这些研究评估了(1)治疗结果,即再次手术与网状切除术和选择性神经切除术相比药物治疗,(2)初次修复后疼痛强度的时间轨迹,(3)再次手术前后的体感特征。方法:在全国范围内,对我们单位就诊的伴有活动相关或最大疼痛强度>7 (NRS; 0-10)的PSPG患者(>3个月)进行检查。使用了对NRS、ADL功能和心理测量进行分类的有效问卷,以及评估躯体感觉表型的标准化定量感觉测试。研究1是一项前瞻性的、基于问卷的队列分析,比较了5年的结果。研究II回顾性检查了患者报告的疼痛强度轨迹。第三项研究随访了再手术前后的体感结果。结果:在研究1(应答率:172/204[84%])中,患者被分配到再手术组(n = 54)或药物治疗组(n = 118)。与基线相比,两个队列的疼痛强度和ADL功能均有显著改善(P < 0.0001),再次手术队列的ADL功能略有优势(P = 0.02)。一名患者实现阳性结果(NRS/ADL变化≥25%)所需的手术次数在1.5至1.9之间,经历阴性结果的手术次数在14至28之间。研究II (n = 95)确定了术后疼痛强度轨迹的两种主要原型,其中51%的患者在初次修复后疼痛未减轻,而29%的患者术后恢复正常,随后出现PSPG。研究III (n = 60)表明,再次手术与皮肤体感觉功能和深层机械伤害感觉功能的丧失(引起的疼痛敏感性下降)有关。摘要:本文证实再手术干预和药物治疗均可改善PSPG患者的高强度疼痛和提高ADL功能。由于研究设计不能解释非特异性治疗效果,因此仍需要高质量的随机对照试验。病理生理学结果表明,植入的补片具有“疼痛发生器”的作用,未来的研究应针对抑制植入补片的免疫炎症反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Pain
Scandinavian Journal of Pain CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
73
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书