Development of a Virtual Health Promotion Intervention for Older Adults with Cognitive Impairment: A Formative Study.

Q3 Medicine
Rahi R Shah, Tiffany M Driesse, Aaron M Monds, Caroline E Summerour, John A Batsis
{"title":"Development of a Virtual Health Promotion Intervention for Older Adults with Cognitive Impairment: A Formative Study.","authors":"Rahi R Shah, Tiffany M Driesse, Aaron M Monds, Caroline E Summerour, John A Batsis","doi":"10.1080/21551197.2025.2573729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated the perspectives of clinicians and dyads (adults with early-stage ADRD and caregivers) on virtually-delivered care and how it relates to the development of a health promotion intervention to slow cognitive decline. Ten clinicians and 10 dyads were recruited via various recruitment platforms. All participated in one semi-structured interview via Zoom focusing on cognitive challenges, barriers, their current virtual-based experiences, and the ideas to improve a proposed virtual-based exercise and nutrition-based intervention. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using thematic analysis. Dyads' perspective identified four major themes for persons with cognitive challenges: (1) Barriers to receiving care for older adults with dementia; (2) Receptivity to receiving virtual-based care if this was balanced with in-person visits; and (3) Enthusiasm if an exercise and nutrition-based intervention delivered virtually can improve access to care but lead to increased anxiety about using technology. Clinicians believed that limited access to receiving care and limited time in clinic were barriers for persons with dementia but having a virtual-based intervention could potentially overcome these challenges and engage individuals. These perspectives aligned with those of the dyads. Participants overall supported virtual-based care and that with careful design, showed promise in developing an exercise and nutrition-based intervention as a possible means to slow cognitive decline.</p>","PeriodicalId":38899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition in Gerontology and Geriatrics","volume":" ","pages":"199-216"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition in Gerontology and Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21551197.2025.2573729","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluated the perspectives of clinicians and dyads (adults with early-stage ADRD and caregivers) on virtually-delivered care and how it relates to the development of a health promotion intervention to slow cognitive decline. Ten clinicians and 10 dyads were recruited via various recruitment platforms. All participated in one semi-structured interview via Zoom focusing on cognitive challenges, barriers, their current virtual-based experiences, and the ideas to improve a proposed virtual-based exercise and nutrition-based intervention. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using thematic analysis. Dyads' perspective identified four major themes for persons with cognitive challenges: (1) Barriers to receiving care for older adults with dementia; (2) Receptivity to receiving virtual-based care if this was balanced with in-person visits; and (3) Enthusiasm if an exercise and nutrition-based intervention delivered virtually can improve access to care but lead to increased anxiety about using technology. Clinicians believed that limited access to receiving care and limited time in clinic were barriers for persons with dementia but having a virtual-based intervention could potentially overcome these challenges and engage individuals. These perspectives aligned with those of the dyads. Participants overall supported virtual-based care and that with careful design, showed promise in developing an exercise and nutrition-based intervention as a possible means to slow cognitive decline.

老年人认知障碍虚拟健康促进干预的发展:形成性研究。
本研究评估了临床医生和二人组(患有早期ADRD的成年人和护理人员)对虚拟交付护理的看法,以及它与健康促进干预发展的关系,以减缓认知能力下降。通过各种招聘平台招募10名临床医生和10名副医生。所有人都通过Zoom参加了一次半结构化访谈,重点关注认知挑战、障碍、他们目前基于虚拟的体验,以及改进拟议的基于虚拟的锻炼和营养干预的想法。访谈记录和分析采用专题分析。Dyads的观点确定了认知挑战患者的四个主要主题:(1)老年痴呆症患者接受护理的障碍;(2)如果与面对面访问相平衡,则接受基于虚拟的护理;(3)如果以运动和营养为基础的干预实际上可以改善获得护理的机会,但会导致使用技术的焦虑增加,那么人们的热情就会增加。临床医生认为,有限的接受护理机会和有限的临床时间是痴呆症患者的障碍,但基于虚拟的干预可能会克服这些挑战,并吸引个人。这些观点与二分体的观点一致。参与者总体上支持基于虚拟的护理,并且经过精心设计,显示出开发以运动和营养为基础的干预作为减缓认知能力下降的可能手段的希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Nutrition in Gerontology and Geriatrics
Journal of Nutrition in Gerontology and Geriatrics Nursing-Nutrition and Dietetics
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nutrition in Gerontology and Geriatrics publishes original research studies that are directly relevant to clinical and community nutrition issues that affect older adults. Epidemiologic and community-based studies are suitable for JNE, as are well-controlled clinical trials of preventive and therapeutic nutritional interventions. The Journal of Nutrition in Gerontology and Geriatrics invites papers on a broad array of topics in the nutrition and aging field, including but not limited to studies of: preventive nutrition, nutritional interventions for chronic disease, aging effects on nutritional requirements, nutritional status and dietary intake behaviors, nutritional frailty and functional status, usefulness of supplements, programmatic interventions, transitions in care and long term care, and community nutrition issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书