Acceptability of intrauterine device insertion without sedation for young nulliparous people: a mixed-methods study.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Sexual health Pub Date : 2025-10-13 DOI:10.1071/SH25100
Sarah M Wright, Prudence Kidman, Clare Boerma, Jessica R Botfield
{"title":"Acceptability of intrauterine device insertion without sedation for young nulliparous people: a mixed-methods study.","authors":"Sarah M Wright, Prudence Kidman, Clare Boerma, Jessica R Botfield","doi":"10.1071/SH25100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is limited understanding of the pain experiences of young nulliparous people undergoing intrauterine device (IUD) insertion without sedation and how this influences the acceptability of the procedure. Although quantitative studies have measured pain intensity during insertion, little research has explored how young people perceive, experience, and contextualise this. We therefore conducted a mixed-methods study to better understand pain experiences and how this affects acceptability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients aged 16-30 years getting an IUD at a family planning clinic were recruited. They completed pre- and post-insertion surveys to rate anticipated and actual pain associated with the insertion. Interviews were conducted post-insertion to discuss expectations, pain, and acceptability. We used a convergent mixed-methods design with merged integration of qualitative and quantitative data for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Altogether, 30 young people participated. Most used simple oral analgesia and local anaesthetic spray to the cervix. On average, participants rated anticipated pain as 6.63/10 and actual pain as 5.88/10. Despite describing the procedure as very painful, most felt the pain was short-lived and therefore tolerable, and that their analgesia was sufficient. Overall, participants reported the procedure as acceptable. Higher acceptability was significantly associated with feeling that their pain relief was sufficient, that the insertion went as they expected, and that they perceived the benefits of the IUD outweighed the discomfort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the IUD insertion was very painful for young nulliparous patients, it was not the only determinant of insertion acceptability. Findings emphasise the importance of clinicians providing sufficient education and information about IUD insertions to support preparation and manage expectations, in addition to providing effective pain management.</p>","PeriodicalId":22165,"journal":{"name":"Sexual health","volume":"22 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexual health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/SH25100","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is limited understanding of the pain experiences of young nulliparous people undergoing intrauterine device (IUD) insertion without sedation and how this influences the acceptability of the procedure. Although quantitative studies have measured pain intensity during insertion, little research has explored how young people perceive, experience, and contextualise this. We therefore conducted a mixed-methods study to better understand pain experiences and how this affects acceptability.

Methods: Patients aged 16-30 years getting an IUD at a family planning clinic were recruited. They completed pre- and post-insertion surveys to rate anticipated and actual pain associated with the insertion. Interviews were conducted post-insertion to discuss expectations, pain, and acceptability. We used a convergent mixed-methods design with merged integration of qualitative and quantitative data for analysis.

Results: Altogether, 30 young people participated. Most used simple oral analgesia and local anaesthetic spray to the cervix. On average, participants rated anticipated pain as 6.63/10 and actual pain as 5.88/10. Despite describing the procedure as very painful, most felt the pain was short-lived and therefore tolerable, and that their analgesia was sufficient. Overall, participants reported the procedure as acceptable. Higher acceptability was significantly associated with feeling that their pain relief was sufficient, that the insertion went as they expected, and that they perceived the benefits of the IUD outweighed the discomfort.

Conclusions: Although the IUD insertion was very painful for young nulliparous patients, it was not the only determinant of insertion acceptability. Findings emphasise the importance of clinicians providing sufficient education and information about IUD insertions to support preparation and manage expectations, in addition to providing effective pain management.

年轻无产人群无镇静植入宫内节育器的可接受性:一项混合方法研究。
背景:目前对年轻未生育的人在没有镇静的情况下植入宫内节育器(IUD)的疼痛经历以及这如何影响手术的可接受性的了解有限。虽然定量研究测量了插入时的疼痛强度,但很少有研究探讨年轻人如何感知、体验和将其置于背景下。因此,我们进行了一项混合方法研究,以更好地了解疼痛体验及其如何影响可接受性。方法:招募年龄16 ~ 30岁在计划生育门诊接受宫内节育器植入的患者。他们完成了植入前后的调查,以评估与植入相关的预期和实际疼痛。在插入后进行访谈,讨论期望、疼痛和可接受性。我们使用了一种融合的混合方法设计,将定性和定量数据融合在一起进行分析。结果:共有30名年轻人参与。多数采用单纯口服镇痛和宫颈局部麻醉喷雾。参与者对预期疼痛的平均评分为6.63/10,对实际疼痛的平均评分为5.88/10。尽管手术过程非常痛苦,但大多数人认为疼痛是短暂的,因此可以忍受,而且他们的镇痛作用是足够的。总的来说,参与者认为这个程序是可以接受的。较高的可接受性与感觉疼痛缓解足够,插入如他们预期的那样,以及他们认为宫内节育器的好处大于不适显著相关。结论:虽然年轻未生育患者的宫内节育器插入非常痛苦,但这并不是决定其可接受性的唯一因素。研究结果强调了临床医生提供关于宫内节育器插入的充分教育和信息的重要性,以支持准备和管理期望,以及提供有效的疼痛管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sexual health
Sexual health 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
121
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Sexual Health publishes original and significant contributions to the fields of sexual health including HIV/AIDS, Sexually transmissible infections, issues of sexuality and relevant areas of reproductive health. This journal is directed towards those working in sexual health as clinicians, public health practitioners, researchers in behavioural, clinical, laboratory, public health or social, sciences. The journal publishes peer reviewed original research, editorials, review articles, topical debates, case reports and critical correspondence. Officially sponsored by: The Australasian Chapter of Sexual Health Medicine of RACP Sexual Health Society of Queensland Sexual Health is the official journal of the International Union against Sexually Transmitted Infections (IUSTI), Asia-Pacific, and the Asia-Oceania Federation of Sexology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书