Redefining Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A New Clinical Perspective.

IF 3.6 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-23 DOI:10.4046/trd.2025.0069
Si Mong Yoon, Yeon Joo Lee
{"title":"Redefining Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A New Clinical Perspective.","authors":"Si Mong Yoon, Yeon Joo Lee","doi":"10.4046/trd.2025.0069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) continues to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality in critical care, yet its diagnosis and classification have historically been limited by varying resources and reliance on advanced technology. In 2024, a global redefinition of ARDS was introduced to overcome these challenges, constituting the most substantial update since the Berlin definition in 2012. This review summarizes the principal revisions to the criteria, including the formal adoption of lung ultrasound, SpO₂/FiO₂ ratios, and the explicit consideration of non-intubated ARDS and contexts with limited resources. These modifications are intended to promote more inclusive diagnostics, earlier detection, and improved research relevance. We provide a critical analysis of the advantages and drawbacks of the new definition, focusing on the heterogeneity of oxygenation measures, complications in FiO₂ assessment, and challenges in imaging evaluation. Additionally, the review underlines ongoing areas for refinement, comprising the establishment of uniform ventilator parameters, greater integration of carbon dioxide metrics, and the application of phenotypic stratification to support the advancement of precision medicine. This conceptual update signals a significant transformation in ARDS diagnosis and is expected to foster broader and more accessible critical care methodologies as well as expanded research participation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23368,"journal":{"name":"Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"10-17"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12784126/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4046/trd.2025.0069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) continues to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality in critical care, yet its diagnosis and classification have historically been limited by varying resources and reliance on advanced technology. In 2024, a global redefinition of ARDS was introduced to overcome these challenges, constituting the most substantial update since the Berlin definition in 2012. This review summarizes the principal revisions to the criteria, including the formal adoption of lung ultrasound, SpO₂/FiO₂ ratios, and the explicit consideration of non-intubated ARDS and contexts with limited resources. These modifications are intended to promote more inclusive diagnostics, earlier detection, and improved research relevance. We provide a critical analysis of the advantages and drawbacks of the new definition, focusing on the heterogeneity of oxygenation measures, complications in FiO₂ assessment, and challenges in imaging evaluation. Additionally, the review underlines ongoing areas for refinement, comprising the establishment of uniform ventilator parameters, greater integration of carbon dioxide metrics, and the application of phenotypic stratification to support the advancement of precision medicine. This conceptual update signals a significant transformation in ARDS diagnosis and is expected to foster broader and more accessible critical care methodologies as well as expanded research participation.

重新定义急性呼吸窘迫综合征:一个新的临床视角。
急性呼吸窘迫综合征(Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, ARDS)仍然是重症监护中发病率和死亡率的重要因素,但其诊断和分类长期以来受到资源可用性和技术依赖性的限制。2024年,为了解决这些限制,提出了新的ARDS全球定义,这是自2012年柏林定义以来最实质性的修订。这篇综述概述了新标准的关键更新,包括正式纳入肺超声,SpO₂/FiO₂比率,以及对非插管ARDS和资源有限环境的识别。这些变化旨在提高诊断的包容性、早期识别和研究的适用性。我们批判性地评估了新框架的优势和局限性,并关注了氧合指数的可变性、FiO₂估算挑战和成像解释。该综述还强调了有待改进的新兴领域,例如对标准化呼吸机设置的需求、二氧化碳动态的整合以及表型分层在推进精准医疗中的作用。这一重新定义代表了ARDS诊断的范式转变,为更广泛、更公平的重症护理实践和研究纳入铺平了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书