Beyond Accuracy: Methodological Advances for Assessing the Clinical Impact of Infectious Disease Diagnostics.

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2025-10-22 eCollection Date: 2025-10-01 DOI:10.1093/ofid/ofaf489
Kimberly C Claeys, Andrea M Prinzi, Tristan T Timbrook
{"title":"Beyond Accuracy: Methodological Advances for Assessing the Clinical Impact of Infectious Disease Diagnostics.","authors":"Kimberly C Claeys, Andrea M Prinzi, Tristan T Timbrook","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofaf489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Evaluating the clinical impact of <i>in vitro</i> diagnostic tests (IVDs) for infectious diseases is complex given their effectiveness depends on context, implementation, and provider behavior. Traditional methodologies for therapy interventions do not adequately capture this complexity, necessitating novel analytical approaches and study designs. This review highlights methodological considerations for improving evidence generation for infectious diseases IVDs. Design and analysis challenges leading to bias and related solutions are reviewed such as the target trial framework. Moreover, novel frameworks such as Benefit-Risk Evaluation of Diagnostics: A Framework, Desirability of Outcome Ranking Management of Antimicrobial Therapy, and Desirability of Outcome Ranking and study designs such as hybrid effectiveness-implementation designs are discussed which allow for holistic ways to assess real-world outcomes. By evaluating IVDs with practical, real-world evidence, tests can better inform clinical decision making, policy, and ultimately patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":"12 Suppl 2","pages":"S1391-S1403"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12541908/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf489","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evaluating the clinical impact of in vitro diagnostic tests (IVDs) for infectious diseases is complex given their effectiveness depends on context, implementation, and provider behavior. Traditional methodologies for therapy interventions do not adequately capture this complexity, necessitating novel analytical approaches and study designs. This review highlights methodological considerations for improving evidence generation for infectious diseases IVDs. Design and analysis challenges leading to bias and related solutions are reviewed such as the target trial framework. Moreover, novel frameworks such as Benefit-Risk Evaluation of Diagnostics: A Framework, Desirability of Outcome Ranking Management of Antimicrobial Therapy, and Desirability of Outcome Ranking and study designs such as hybrid effectiveness-implementation designs are discussed which allow for holistic ways to assess real-world outcomes. By evaluating IVDs with practical, real-world evidence, tests can better inform clinical decision making, policy, and ultimately patient outcomes.

超越准确性:评估传染病诊断临床影响的方法学进展。
评估体外诊断测试(IVDs)对传染病的临床影响是复杂的,因为它们的有效性取决于环境、实施和提供者行为。传统的治疗干预方法不能充分捕捉到这种复杂性,需要新的分析方法和研究设计。这篇综述强调了改进传染病ivd证据生成的方法学考虑。设计和分析的挑战导致偏见和相关的解决方案进行审查,如目标试验框架。此外,还讨论了新的框架,如诊断的益处-风险评估:一个框架,抗菌治疗结果排名管理的可取性,以及结果排名的可取性和研究设计,如混合有效性-实施设计,允许整体方法来评估现实世界的结果。通过使用实际的、真实的证据来评估ivd,检测可以更好地为临床决策、政策和最终的患者结果提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
630
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Forum Infectious Diseases provides a global forum for the publication of clinical, translational, and basic research findings in a fully open access, online journal environment. The journal reflects the broad diversity of the field of infectious diseases, and focuses on the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice, with a particular emphasis on knowledge that holds the potential to improve patient care in populations around the world. Fully peer-reviewed, OFID supports the international community of infectious diseases experts by providing a venue for articles that further the understanding of all aspects of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信