Kimberly C Claeys, Andrea M Prinzi, Tristan T Timbrook
{"title":"Beyond Accuracy: Methodological Advances for Assessing the Clinical Impact of Infectious Disease Diagnostics.","authors":"Kimberly C Claeys, Andrea M Prinzi, Tristan T Timbrook","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofaf489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Evaluating the clinical impact of <i>in vitro</i> diagnostic tests (IVDs) for infectious diseases is complex given their effectiveness depends on context, implementation, and provider behavior. Traditional methodologies for therapy interventions do not adequately capture this complexity, necessitating novel analytical approaches and study designs. This review highlights methodological considerations for improving evidence generation for infectious diseases IVDs. Design and analysis challenges leading to bias and related solutions are reviewed such as the target trial framework. Moreover, novel frameworks such as Benefit-Risk Evaluation of Diagnostics: A Framework, Desirability of Outcome Ranking Management of Antimicrobial Therapy, and Desirability of Outcome Ranking and study designs such as hybrid effectiveness-implementation designs are discussed which allow for holistic ways to assess real-world outcomes. By evaluating IVDs with practical, real-world evidence, tests can better inform clinical decision making, policy, and ultimately patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":"12 Suppl 2","pages":"S1391-S1403"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12541908/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaf489","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Evaluating the clinical impact of in vitro diagnostic tests (IVDs) for infectious diseases is complex given their effectiveness depends on context, implementation, and provider behavior. Traditional methodologies for therapy interventions do not adequately capture this complexity, necessitating novel analytical approaches and study designs. This review highlights methodological considerations for improving evidence generation for infectious diseases IVDs. Design and analysis challenges leading to bias and related solutions are reviewed such as the target trial framework. Moreover, novel frameworks such as Benefit-Risk Evaluation of Diagnostics: A Framework, Desirability of Outcome Ranking Management of Antimicrobial Therapy, and Desirability of Outcome Ranking and study designs such as hybrid effectiveness-implementation designs are discussed which allow for holistic ways to assess real-world outcomes. By evaluating IVDs with practical, real-world evidence, tests can better inform clinical decision making, policy, and ultimately patient outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Open Forum Infectious Diseases provides a global forum for the publication of clinical, translational, and basic research findings in a fully open access, online journal environment. The journal reflects the broad diversity of the field of infectious diseases, and focuses on the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice, with a particular emphasis on knowledge that holds the potential to improve patient care in populations around the world. Fully peer-reviewed, OFID supports the international community of infectious diseases experts by providing a venue for articles that further the understanding of all aspects of infectious diseases.