Antifungal prophylaxis in patients with FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3-internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD)-positive acute myeloid leukaemia receiving sorafenib during initial induction and consolidation treatment in ALLG AMLM16 trial.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Chin Fen Neoh, Michelle K Yong, Leesa Rowley, Andrew W Roberts, Glen A Kennedy, Simon He, Anthony P Schwarer, Ian A Bilmon, Andrew H Wei, Monica A Slavin
{"title":"Antifungal prophylaxis in patients with FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3-internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD)-positive acute myeloid leukaemia receiving sorafenib during initial induction and consolidation treatment in ALLG AMLM16 trial.","authors":"Chin Fen Neoh, Michelle K Yong, Leesa Rowley, Andrew W Roberts, Glen A Kennedy, Simon He, Anthony P Schwarer, Ian A Bilmon, Andrew H Wei, Monica A Slavin","doi":"10.1093/jac/dkaf385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To report the rates of proven, probable and possible invasive fungal disease (IFD) in patients receiving antifungal prophylaxis during initial induction and consolidation treatment of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) plus either sorafenib or placebo.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As part of a randomized, double-blind trial of sorafenib or placebo in combination with intensive chemotherapy for newly diagnosed adult patients with FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3-internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD)-positive AML (ALLG AMLM16 trial), liposomal amphotericin B (LAMB) prophylaxis was administered at 5 mg/kg twice weekly during induction and consolidation phases in both sorafenib and placebo treatment arms. Alternative prophylaxis was allowed per institutional practice once sorafenib/placebo treatment was completed. IFD episodes, reported as either a serious adverse event or an adverse event, were adjudicated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 94 patients included for analysis of IFD, four IFD episodes (one proven and three possible) were reported during the induction treatment phase. The overall rate of proven/probable/possible IFD was 4.3% (4/94), with rates of 3.1% (2/64) and 6.7% (2/30) in the sorafenib and placebo groups, respectively. Seven patients had infusion-related reactions, and four were reported to be associated with LAMB administration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LAMB with or without subsequent azole prophylaxis could be an alternative option for fungal prophylaxis for patients with AML in whom azoles are contraindicated or not tolerated. Sorafenib does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of IFD.</p>","PeriodicalId":14969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkaf385","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To report the rates of proven, probable and possible invasive fungal disease (IFD) in patients receiving antifungal prophylaxis during initial induction and consolidation treatment of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) plus either sorafenib or placebo.

Methods: As part of a randomized, double-blind trial of sorafenib or placebo in combination with intensive chemotherapy for newly diagnosed adult patients with FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3-internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD)-positive AML (ALLG AMLM16 trial), liposomal amphotericin B (LAMB) prophylaxis was administered at 5 mg/kg twice weekly during induction and consolidation phases in both sorafenib and placebo treatment arms. Alternative prophylaxis was allowed per institutional practice once sorafenib/placebo treatment was completed. IFD episodes, reported as either a serious adverse event or an adverse event, were adjudicated.

Results: Of the 94 patients included for analysis of IFD, four IFD episodes (one proven and three possible) were reported during the induction treatment phase. The overall rate of proven/probable/possible IFD was 4.3% (4/94), with rates of 3.1% (2/64) and 6.7% (2/30) in the sorafenib and placebo groups, respectively. Seven patients had infusion-related reactions, and four were reported to be associated with LAMB administration.

Conclusions: LAMB with or without subsequent azole prophylaxis could be an alternative option for fungal prophylaxis for patients with AML in whom azoles are contraindicated or not tolerated. Sorafenib does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of IFD.

ALLG AMLM16试验中fms样酪氨酸激酶3-内串联重复(FLT3-ITD)阳性急性髓性白血病患者在初始诱导和巩固治疗期间接受索拉非尼的抗真菌预防
目的:报告在急性髓性白血病(AML)初始诱导和巩固治疗期间接受抗真菌预防治疗的患者中证实的、可能的和可能的侵袭性真菌疾病(IFD)的发生率,这些患者加用索拉非尼或安慰剂。方法:作为一项随机双盲试验的一部分,索拉非尼或安慰剂联合强化化疗治疗新诊断的成年患者fms样酪氨酸激酶3-内部串联重复(FLT3-ITD)阳性AML (ALLG AMLM16试验),在诱导和巩固阶段,索拉非尼和安慰剂治疗组以5mg /kg的剂量给予脂质两性霉素B (LAMB)预防,每周两次。一旦完成索拉非尼/安慰剂治疗,每个机构实践允许替代预防。IFD发作,报告为严重不良事件或不良事件,被裁定。结果:纳入IFD分析的94例患者中,在诱导治疗阶段报告了4例IFD发作(1例已证实,3例可能)。确诊/可能/可能IFD的总发生率为4.3%(4/94),索拉非尼组和安慰剂组的发生率分别为3.1%(2/64)和6.7%(2/30)。7例患者发生输注相关反应,其中4例报告与LAMB给药相关。结论:对于唑类药物禁忌症或不耐受的AML患者,LAMB联合或不联合后续的唑类药物预防可能是真菌预防的另一种选择。索拉非尼似乎与IFD风险增加无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
5.80%
发文量
423
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes articles that further knowledge and advance the science and application of antimicrobial chemotherapy with antibiotics and antifungal, antiviral and antiprotozoal agents. The Journal publishes primarily in human medicine, and articles in veterinary medicine likely to have an impact on global health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信