{"title":"Development of a Quantification Method for Procyanidin B1 and B3 in Pine Bark Extracts Using Heart-Cutting HPLC.","authors":"Ippei Suzuki, Yasuhito Kumai, Jun Takebayashi","doi":"10.1093/chromsci/bmaf050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pine bark extract (PBE) is a material used as a health food. Its functionality is attributed to the antioxidant effect of its contained procyanidins, and quantification of the procyanidin content is important to monitor its quality. However, conventional single-column High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) methods often lack sufficient separation for procyanidins in complex matrices like PBE, leading to inaccurate quantification. In order to improve the accuracy of analysis for procyanidins B1 (PCB1) and B3 (PCB3) contained in PBE, we developed a highly accurate analytical method employing heart-cutting HPLC using columns with multiple properties and performed a detailed validation. The PCB1 and PCB3 contained in commercial health foods ranged from 0.43-2.95 mg/g, with a relative standard deviation of 0.77-6.17%. The spike and recovery tests showed that the recovery of beverages ranged from 98 to 106% at low and high concentrations, and for tablets, the recovery ranged from 95 to 118%. The repeatability relative standard deviation ranged from 1.10 to 3.57%, and the Horwitz Ratio ranged from 0.26-1.89. The intermediate relative standard deviation ranged from 2.62 to 6.83%. Single-laboratory validation of the analytical method employing heart-cutting HPLC showed that it is sufficiently accurate for analyzing PCB1 and PCB3 in commercial health foods containing PBE.</p>","PeriodicalId":15430,"journal":{"name":"Journal of chromatographic science","volume":"63 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of chromatographic science","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/chromsci/bmaf050","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Pine bark extract (PBE) is a material used as a health food. Its functionality is attributed to the antioxidant effect of its contained procyanidins, and quantification of the procyanidin content is important to monitor its quality. However, conventional single-column High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) methods often lack sufficient separation for procyanidins in complex matrices like PBE, leading to inaccurate quantification. In order to improve the accuracy of analysis for procyanidins B1 (PCB1) and B3 (PCB3) contained in PBE, we developed a highly accurate analytical method employing heart-cutting HPLC using columns with multiple properties and performed a detailed validation. The PCB1 and PCB3 contained in commercial health foods ranged from 0.43-2.95 mg/g, with a relative standard deviation of 0.77-6.17%. The spike and recovery tests showed that the recovery of beverages ranged from 98 to 106% at low and high concentrations, and for tablets, the recovery ranged from 95 to 118%. The repeatability relative standard deviation ranged from 1.10 to 3.57%, and the Horwitz Ratio ranged from 0.26-1.89. The intermediate relative standard deviation ranged from 2.62 to 6.83%. Single-laboratory validation of the analytical method employing heart-cutting HPLC showed that it is sufficiently accurate for analyzing PCB1 and PCB3 in commercial health foods containing PBE.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Chromatographic Science is devoted to the dissemination of information concerning all methods of chromatographic analysis. The standard manuscript is a description of recent original research that covers any or all phases of a specific separation problem, principle, or method. Manuscripts which have a high degree of novelty and fundamental significance to the field of separation science are particularly encouraged. It is expected the authors will clearly state in the Introduction how their method compares in some markedly new and improved way to previous published related methods. Analytical performance characteristics of new methods including sensitivity, tested limits of detection or quantification, accuracy, precision, and specificity should be provided. Manuscripts which describe a straightforward extension of a known analytical method or an application to a previously analyzed and/or uncomplicated sample matrix will not normally be reviewed favorably. Manuscripts in which mass spectrometry is the dominant analytical method and chromatography is of marked secondary importance may be declined.