Effects of Metal Mixtures on Benthic Macroinvertebrate Communities in the Field.

IF 2.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Adam Peters, Stijn Baken S, Christopher Cooper, Elizabeth Middleton, Jasim Chowdhury, Yamini Gopalapillai
{"title":"Effects of Metal Mixtures on Benthic Macroinvertebrate Communities in the Field.","authors":"Adam Peters, Stijn Baken S, Christopher Cooper, Elizabeth Middleton, Jasim Chowdhury, Yamini Gopalapillai","doi":"10.1093/etojnl/vgaf266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Concerns about the toxic effects of chemical mixtures have led to regulatory organisations considering how best to address exposures to complex mixtures in the environment. The ubiquitous nature of metals means that they are always present in the environment, even if only at very low levels. It is appropriate to consider whether the mixtures of commonly regulated metals in the environment are likely to cause adverse effects on ecosystems if the Environmental Quality Standards (EQS) for all the individual metals are complied with. The total risk from four metals (copper, lead, nickel, and zinc) was evaluated in terms of the potential effects on freshwater benthic macroinvertebrate communities from the UK. The total risk was expressed as the sum of the individual Risk Characterisation Ratios for each metal (∑RCR). The ecological data are expressed relative to predicted reference conditions to provide an Ecological Quality Ratio, which indicates whether the local community has been affected by any stressors by comparison to unimpacted reference conditions. Very high metal exposures, expressed as the ∑RCR value, were found to be associated with reduced ecosystem diversity. However, a 10% reduction in community diversity relative to the predicted unimpacted reference conditions is expected to occur only at ∑RCR values of greater than 8 ∑RCR units. This indicates that in 'real world' situations, where a suite of inorganic and organic pollutants may be present, if the EQS for each of the individual metals is complied with (in this case, a ∑RCR value no higher than 4), there will likely not be any observable impact on benthic invertebrate community diversity despite the presence of these metals and other contaminants.</p>","PeriodicalId":11793,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/etojnl/vgaf266","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Concerns about the toxic effects of chemical mixtures have led to regulatory organisations considering how best to address exposures to complex mixtures in the environment. The ubiquitous nature of metals means that they are always present in the environment, even if only at very low levels. It is appropriate to consider whether the mixtures of commonly regulated metals in the environment are likely to cause adverse effects on ecosystems if the Environmental Quality Standards (EQS) for all the individual metals are complied with. The total risk from four metals (copper, lead, nickel, and zinc) was evaluated in terms of the potential effects on freshwater benthic macroinvertebrate communities from the UK. The total risk was expressed as the sum of the individual Risk Characterisation Ratios for each metal (∑RCR). The ecological data are expressed relative to predicted reference conditions to provide an Ecological Quality Ratio, which indicates whether the local community has been affected by any stressors by comparison to unimpacted reference conditions. Very high metal exposures, expressed as the ∑RCR value, were found to be associated with reduced ecosystem diversity. However, a 10% reduction in community diversity relative to the predicted unimpacted reference conditions is expected to occur only at ∑RCR values of greater than 8 ∑RCR units. This indicates that in 'real world' situations, where a suite of inorganic and organic pollutants may be present, if the EQS for each of the individual metals is complied with (in this case, a ∑RCR value no higher than 4), there will likely not be any observable impact on benthic invertebrate community diversity despite the presence of these metals and other contaminants.

金属混合物对野外底栖大型无脊椎动物群落的影响。
对化学混合物的毒性影响的担忧促使监管机构考虑如何最好地解决环境中复杂混合物的暴露问题。金属无处不在的性质意味着它们总是存在于环境中,即使只是非常低的水平。如果所有个别金属的环境质量标准(EQS)都得到遵守,那么考虑环境中普遍受管制的金属混合物是否可能对生态系统造成不利影响是适当的。根据对英国淡水底栖大型无脊椎动物群落的潜在影响,评估了四种金属(铜、铅、镍和锌)的总风险。总风险表示为每种金属的个体风险特征比率(∑RCR)的总和。生态数据相对于预测的参考条件来表示,以提供一个生态质量比率,该比率表明当地社区是否受到任何压力因素的影响,并与未受影响的参考条件进行比较。极高的金属暴露(以∑RCR值表示)与生态系统多样性降低有关。然而,只有当∑RCR值大于8∑RCR单位时,群落多样性才会相对于预测的未受影响参考条件减少10%。这表明,在可能存在一系列无机和有机污染物的“现实世界”情况下,如果每种金属的EQS都得到遵守(在这种情况下,∑RCR值不高于4),那么尽管存在这些金属和其他污染物,底栖无脊椎动物群落多样性可能不会受到任何可观察到的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
9.80%
发文量
265
审稿时长
3.4 months
期刊介绍: The Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) publishes two journals: Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (ET&C) and Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (IEAM). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is dedicated to furthering scientific knowledge and disseminating information on environmental toxicology and chemistry, including the application of these sciences to risk assessment.[...] Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is interdisciplinary in scope and integrates the fields of environmental toxicology; environmental, analytical, and molecular chemistry; ecology; physiology; biochemistry; microbiology; genetics; genomics; environmental engineering; chemical, environmental, and biological modeling; epidemiology; and earth sciences. ET&C seeks to publish papers describing original experimental or theoretical work that significantly advances understanding in the area of environmental toxicology, environmental chemistry and hazard/risk assessment. Emphasis is given to papers that enhance capabilities for the prediction, measurement, and assessment of the fate and effects of chemicals in the environment, rather than simply providing additional data. The scientific impact of papers is judged in terms of the breadth and depth of the findings and the expected influence on existing or future scientific practice. Methodological papers must make clear not only how the work differs from existing practice, but the significance of these differences to the field. Site-based research or monitoring must have regional or global implications beyond the particular site, such as evaluating processes, mechanisms, or theory under a natural environmental setting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信