Psychiatry Consultation Clinic: A Model that Improves Access to Care and Corresponds to Decreased Anxiety and Depressive Symptoms

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Catherine Parker, Sejal Mahajan, Christine Beran Flicek, Xiaoming Zeng, Nathaniel A. Sowa
{"title":"Psychiatry Consultation Clinic: A Model that Improves Access to Care and Corresponds to Decreased Anxiety and Depressive Symptoms","authors":"Catherine Parker,&nbsp;Sejal Mahajan,&nbsp;Christine Beran Flicek,&nbsp;Xiaoming Zeng,&nbsp;Nathaniel A. Sowa","doi":"10.1007/s10488-025-01476-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Access to outpatient psychiatric care is often delayed, with many patients unable to obtain timely specialty evaluation. Integrated care models such as Collaborative Care Management (CoCM) and co-located care improve outcomes but have not been widely adopted due to resource and structural barriers. Direct outpatient psychiatric consultation may offer a feasible alternative, yet its effectiveness remains understudied.</p><p>We conducted a retrospective review of the Psychiatry Consultation Clinic (PCC) at a large academic medical center. The PCC provides diagnostic clarification and treatment recommendations to primary care providers (PCPs) rather than longitudinal psychiatric care. Adult patients (≥18 years) referred between October 2019 and October 2022 from family and internal medicine practices were included (N = 545). Primary outcomes were: (1) time to implementation of consult recommendations; (2) rate of psychotropic medication implementation; and (3) changes in anxiety (Gretrospective review of the Psychiatry Consultation AD-7) and depression (PHQ-9) scores. Secondary outcomes included psychiatric diagnoses and subsequent referrals for specialty care.</p><p>The median time from referral to consultation was 5 weeks, substantially shorter than the average 6-month wait for traditional psychiatry appointments within the same system. Most patients (88.1%) were seen once, and 83.1% of visits were conducted via telemedicine. Pharmacotherapy was recommended for 81.8% of patients, and 81.4% had at least one recommendation implemented, typically within 1–3 weeks. Antidepressants accounted for two-thirds of recommendations. For patients with pre- and post-consultation data, mean GAD-7 and PHQ-9 scores decreased significantly (−2.9 and −5.0 points, respectively; both p &lt; 0.0001), with clinically meaningful improvements observed in depression symptoms. Nearly one-quarter of patients were referred for longitudinal specialty psychiatric care, with 70% establishing follow-up within six months.</p><p>The direct consultation model was feasible, resulted in high uptake of recommendations by PCPs, and was associated with improvements in patient symptoms, particularly depression. Compared with integrated models, this approach may be easier to implement in primary care settings with limited behavioral health infrastructure. Prospective controlled studies are warranted to establish the efficacy of this outpatient consultation model and compare it to other paradigms within the continuum of psychiatric care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7195,"journal":{"name":"Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research","volume":"53 1","pages":"38 - 46"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10488-025-01476-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Access to outpatient psychiatric care is often delayed, with many patients unable to obtain timely specialty evaluation. Integrated care models such as Collaborative Care Management (CoCM) and co-located care improve outcomes but have not been widely adopted due to resource and structural barriers. Direct outpatient psychiatric consultation may offer a feasible alternative, yet its effectiveness remains understudied.

We conducted a retrospective review of the Psychiatry Consultation Clinic (PCC) at a large academic medical center. The PCC provides diagnostic clarification and treatment recommendations to primary care providers (PCPs) rather than longitudinal psychiatric care. Adult patients (≥18 years) referred between October 2019 and October 2022 from family and internal medicine practices were included (N = 545). Primary outcomes were: (1) time to implementation of consult recommendations; (2) rate of psychotropic medication implementation; and (3) changes in anxiety (Gretrospective review of the Psychiatry Consultation AD-7) and depression (PHQ-9) scores. Secondary outcomes included psychiatric diagnoses and subsequent referrals for specialty care.

The median time from referral to consultation was 5 weeks, substantially shorter than the average 6-month wait for traditional psychiatry appointments within the same system. Most patients (88.1%) were seen once, and 83.1% of visits were conducted via telemedicine. Pharmacotherapy was recommended for 81.8% of patients, and 81.4% had at least one recommendation implemented, typically within 1–3 weeks. Antidepressants accounted for two-thirds of recommendations. For patients with pre- and post-consultation data, mean GAD-7 and PHQ-9 scores decreased significantly (−2.9 and −5.0 points, respectively; both p < 0.0001), with clinically meaningful improvements observed in depression symptoms. Nearly one-quarter of patients were referred for longitudinal specialty psychiatric care, with 70% establishing follow-up within six months.

The direct consultation model was feasible, resulted in high uptake of recommendations by PCPs, and was associated with improvements in patient symptoms, particularly depression. Compared with integrated models, this approach may be easier to implement in primary care settings with limited behavioral health infrastructure. Prospective controlled studies are warranted to establish the efficacy of this outpatient consultation model and compare it to other paradigms within the continuum of psychiatric care.

Abstract Image

精神病学咨询诊所:一种改善获得护理和减少焦虑和抑郁症状的模式。
获得门诊精神科护理往往延迟,与许多患者无法获得及时的专业评估。协作式护理管理(CoCM)和同址式护理等综合护理模式改善了治疗效果,但由于资源和结构障碍,尚未得到广泛采用。直接门诊精神科会诊可能是一个可行的选择,但其有效性仍有待研究。我们对一家大型学术医疗中心的精神病学咨询诊所(PCC)进行了回顾性研究。PCC向初级保健提供者(pcp)提供诊断澄清和治疗建议,而不是纵向精神病学护理。纳入2019年10月至2022年10月从家庭和内科就诊的成年患者(≥18岁)(N = 545)。主要结果包括:(1)咨询建议实施的时间;(2)精神药物使用率;焦虑(精神病学会诊AD-7)和抑郁(PHQ-9)得分的变化。次要结果包括精神病诊断和随后的专科护理转诊。从转诊到咨询的中位数时间为5周,大大缩短了同一系统内传统精神病学预约的平均6个月等待时间。大多数患者(88.1%)就诊一次,83.1%的就诊是通过远程医疗进行的。81.8%的患者推荐药物治疗,81.4%的患者至少实施了一项建议,通常在1-3周内。抗抑郁药占推荐剂量的三分之二。对于有会诊前后资料的患者,GAD-7和PHQ-9平均评分显著下降(分别为-2.9分和-5.0分,p均< 0.0001),抑郁症状有临床意义的改善。近四分之一的患者接受了纵向专科精神病治疗,70%的患者在6个月内进行了随访。直接咨询模式是可行的,导致pcp对建议的高度接受,并与患者症状,特别是抑郁症的改善有关。与综合模型相比,这种方法可能更容易在行为卫生基础设施有限的初级保健机构中实施。有必要进行前瞻性对照研究,以确定这种门诊咨询模式的有效性,并将其与精神科护理连续体中的其他模式进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: The aim of Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services is to improve mental health services through research. This journal primarily publishes peer-reviewed, original empirical research articles.  The journal also welcomes systematic reviews. Please contact the editor if you have suggestions for special issues or sections focusing on important contemporary issues.  The journal usually does not publish articles on drug or alcohol addiction unless it focuses on persons who are dually diagnosed. Manuscripts on children and adults are equally welcome. Topics for articles may include, but need not be limited to, effectiveness of services, measure development, economics of mental health services, managed mental health care, implementation of services, staffing, leadership, organizational relations and policy, and the like.  Please review previously published articles for fit with our journal before submitting your manuscript.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书