Fuel cell air compressor concepts to enhance the efficiency of FCEV

Christian Frühwirth, Eberhard Schutting, Helmut Eichlseder
{"title":"Fuel cell air compressor concepts to enhance the efficiency of FCEV","authors":"Christian Frühwirth,&nbsp;Eberhard Schutting,&nbsp;Helmut Eichlseder","doi":"10.1007/s41104-025-00158-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The thermal management system and the balance-of-plant (BoP) in fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEV) are characterized by a particularly high level of complexity and a number of interfaces. Optimizing the efficiency of the overall vehicle is of special importance to maximize the range and increase the attractiveness of this technology to customers. This paper focuses on the optimization potential of the air supply system in the BoP, whereby the charging concepts of the electric supercharger (ESC) and the electrically assisted turbocharger (EAT) as well as the integration of water spray injection (WSI) at the compressor inlet are investigated in the framework of an FCEV complete vehicle co-simulation. As a benchmark for the integration of these optimization measures, the complete vehicle co-simulation is designed for a fuel cell electric passenger car of the current generation. Here, thermo-hydraulic fluid circuits in the thermal management software KULI are coupled with mathematical-physical models in MATLAB/Simulink. Applying advanced simulation methodologies for the components of fuel cell, powertrain and vehicle cabin enables the mapping of the effects of realistic operating conditions on the FCEV characteristics. The EAT offers the advantage over the ESC that, due to the arrangement of an exhaust gas turbine, a part of the exhaust gas enthalpy flow downstream of the fuel cell stack can be recovered, which reduces the electrical compressor drive power. Moreover, an additional reduction of this power consumption can be achieved by WSI, as the effect of evaporative cooling lowers the initial compression temperature. For analysis and comparison, these concepts are again modeled with high degree of detail and integrated into the benchmark overall vehicle simulation. The results indicate considerable reductions in the electric compressor drive power of the EAT compared to the ESC, with noteworthy potential for reducing the vehicle’s hydrogen consumption. At an operating point in Worldwide harmonized Light Duty Test Cycle (WLTC) under 35 <span>\\(^{\\circ }\\)</span>C ambient temperature and 25 % relative humidity, the electrical compressor drive power shows a reduction potential of −40 %, which corresponds to a vehicle-level hydrogen consumption reduction of up to −3 %. In addition, the results also highlight the effect of the WSI in both charging concepts, whereby its potential to reduce the hydrogen consumption on the overall vehicle level is relatively small. In WLTC, at 35 <span>\\(^{\\circ }\\)</span>C ambient temperature and 25 % relative humidity, the compressor drive power reduction potential for ESC and EAT averages −5 %, while the effect on hydrogen consumption is only around −0.25 %.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100150,"journal":{"name":"Automotive and Engine Technology","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s41104-025-00158-6.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Automotive and Engine Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41104-025-00158-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The thermal management system and the balance-of-plant (BoP) in fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEV) are characterized by a particularly high level of complexity and a number of interfaces. Optimizing the efficiency of the overall vehicle is of special importance to maximize the range and increase the attractiveness of this technology to customers. This paper focuses on the optimization potential of the air supply system in the BoP, whereby the charging concepts of the electric supercharger (ESC) and the electrically assisted turbocharger (EAT) as well as the integration of water spray injection (WSI) at the compressor inlet are investigated in the framework of an FCEV complete vehicle co-simulation. As a benchmark for the integration of these optimization measures, the complete vehicle co-simulation is designed for a fuel cell electric passenger car of the current generation. Here, thermo-hydraulic fluid circuits in the thermal management software KULI are coupled with mathematical-physical models in MATLAB/Simulink. Applying advanced simulation methodologies for the components of fuel cell, powertrain and vehicle cabin enables the mapping of the effects of realistic operating conditions on the FCEV characteristics. The EAT offers the advantage over the ESC that, due to the arrangement of an exhaust gas turbine, a part of the exhaust gas enthalpy flow downstream of the fuel cell stack can be recovered, which reduces the electrical compressor drive power. Moreover, an additional reduction of this power consumption can be achieved by WSI, as the effect of evaporative cooling lowers the initial compression temperature. For analysis and comparison, these concepts are again modeled with high degree of detail and integrated into the benchmark overall vehicle simulation. The results indicate considerable reductions in the electric compressor drive power of the EAT compared to the ESC, with noteworthy potential for reducing the vehicle’s hydrogen consumption. At an operating point in Worldwide harmonized Light Duty Test Cycle (WLTC) under 35 \(^{\circ }\)C ambient temperature and 25 % relative humidity, the electrical compressor drive power shows a reduction potential of −40 %, which corresponds to a vehicle-level hydrogen consumption reduction of up to −3 %. In addition, the results also highlight the effect of the WSI in both charging concepts, whereby its potential to reduce the hydrogen consumption on the overall vehicle level is relatively small. In WLTC, at 35 \(^{\circ }\)C ambient temperature and 25 % relative humidity, the compressor drive power reduction potential for ESC and EAT averages −5 %, while the effect on hydrogen consumption is only around −0.25 %.

燃料电池空气压缩机的概念,以提高燃料电池汽车的效率
燃料电池电动汽车(FCEV)的热管理系统和电厂平衡系统(BoP)具有特别高的复杂性和大量的接口。优化整体车辆的效率对于最大化行驶里程和增加该技术对客户的吸引力具有特别重要的意义。本文重点研究了防喷器供气系统的优化潜力,在FCEV整车联合仿真的框架下,研究了电动增压器(ESC)和电动辅助涡轮增压器(EAT)的增压概念,以及压气机进口水雾喷射(WSI)的集成。作为这些优化措施整合的基准,设计了当前一代燃料电池电动乘用车的整车联合仿真。在这里,热管理软件KULI中的热液压流体回路与MATLAB/Simulink中的数学物理模型相结合。采用先进的模拟方法对燃料电池、动力系统和车辆舱室组件进行模拟,可以映射出实际操作条件对燃料电池汽车特性的影响。与ESC相比,EAT的优势在于,由于配备了废气涡轮,燃料电池堆下游的部分废气焓流可以被回收,从而降低了电动压缩机的驱动功率。此外,由于蒸发冷却的效果降低了初始压缩温度,WSI可以进一步降低这种功耗。为了进行分析和比较,我们再次对这些概念进行了高度详细的建模,并将其集成到基准整车仿真中。结果表明,与ESC相比,EAT的电动压缩机驱动功率显著降低,具有显著的降低车辆氢消耗的潜力。在世界统一轻型测试周期(WLTC)的工作点,环境温度为35 \(^{\circ }\)℃,25% relative humidity, the electrical compressor drive power shows a reduction potential of −40 %, which corresponds to a vehicle-level hydrogen consumption reduction of up to −3 %. In addition, the results also highlight the effect of the WSI in both charging concepts, whereby its potential to reduce the hydrogen consumption on the overall vehicle level is relatively small. In WLTC, at 35 \(^{\circ }\)C ambient temperature and 25 % relative humidity, the compressor drive power reduction potential for ESC and EAT averages −5 %, while the effect on hydrogen consumption is only around −0.25 %.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书