Comparison of Filtering Methods for Calculating ARFI log(VoA) to Delineate Carotid Plaque Features, In Vivo

IF 1.8
Shureed Qazi;Keerthi S. Anand;Jonathon W. Homeister;Mark A. Farber;Caterina M. Gallippi
{"title":"Comparison of Filtering Methods for Calculating ARFI log(VoA) to Delineate Carotid Plaque Features, In Vivo","authors":"Shureed Qazi;Keerthi S. Anand;Jonathon W. Homeister;Mark A. Farber;Caterina M. Gallippi","doi":"10.1109/OJUFFC.2025.3609675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Carotid atherosclerosis is a major cause of ischemic stroke, and the ability to non-invasively assess plaque composition and structure is critical to effective stroke risk assessment. Carotid plaque components are delineated noninvasively by Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI)-derived Variance of Acceleration, evaluated as its decadic log (log(VoA)). To date, this log(VoA) parameter has been calculated by isolating the variance in ARFI-induced displacement profiles using the second-order time derivative (SOTD), a high-pass filtering operation. The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of the SOTD filter to various other filtering methods in application to delineating human carotid plaque components, in vivo. Specifically, the SOTD filter was compared to Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Finite Impulse Response (FIR), Infinite Impulse Response (IIR), and mean-center spatial (MCS) filters. Filter performances were evaluated in terms of the resulting log(VoA) generalized contrast-to-noise ratio (gCNR) for distinguishing plaque features in human carotid plaques, in vivo, which were validated by spatially aligned histology. Results indicated that the SOTD filter consistently provided the highest gCNR for most plaque components, whereas the performances yielded by the other filters were more variable. The study demonstrated that the SOTD filter remains the preferred method for log(VoA) calculation due to its effectiveness for delineating carotid plaque features.","PeriodicalId":73301,"journal":{"name":"IEEE open journal of ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control","volume":"5 ","pages":"181-189"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=11162608","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE open journal of ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11162608/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Carotid atherosclerosis is a major cause of ischemic stroke, and the ability to non-invasively assess plaque composition and structure is critical to effective stroke risk assessment. Carotid plaque components are delineated noninvasively by Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI)-derived Variance of Acceleration, evaluated as its decadic log (log(VoA)). To date, this log(VoA) parameter has been calculated by isolating the variance in ARFI-induced displacement profiles using the second-order time derivative (SOTD), a high-pass filtering operation. The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of the SOTD filter to various other filtering methods in application to delineating human carotid plaque components, in vivo. Specifically, the SOTD filter was compared to Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Finite Impulse Response (FIR), Infinite Impulse Response (IIR), and mean-center spatial (MCS) filters. Filter performances were evaluated in terms of the resulting log(VoA) generalized contrast-to-noise ratio (gCNR) for distinguishing plaque features in human carotid plaques, in vivo, which were validated by spatially aligned histology. Results indicated that the SOTD filter consistently provided the highest gCNR for most plaque components, whereas the performances yielded by the other filters were more variable. The study demonstrated that the SOTD filter remains the preferred method for log(VoA) calculation due to its effectiveness for delineating carotid plaque features.
计算ARFI日志(VoA)以描绘颈动脉斑块特征的过滤方法的比较,在体内
颈动脉粥样硬化是缺血性卒中的主要原因,无创评估斑块组成和结构的能力对于有效评估卒中风险至关重要。颈动脉斑块成分通过声辐射力脉冲(ARFI)衍生的加速度方差无创描绘,以其十进对数(log(VoA))进行评估。迄今为止,该测井(VoA)参数是通过使用二阶时间导数(SOTD)(一种高通滤波操作)隔离arfi引起的位移剖面的方差来计算的。本研究的目的是比较SOTD滤波器在体内与其他各种滤波方法在描绘人体颈动脉斑块成分方面的性能。具体来说,SOTD滤波器与主成分分析(PCA)、有限脉冲响应(FIR)、无限脉冲响应(IIR)和平均中心空间(MCS)滤波器进行了比较。根据所得的对数(VoA)广义对比噪声比(gCNR)来评估过滤器的性能,以区分人颈动脉斑块的斑块特征,在体内,这是通过空间排列组织学验证的。结果表明,SOTD过滤器始终为大多数斑块成分提供最高的gCNR,而其他过滤器的性能变化较大。该研究表明,SOTD滤波器仍然是对数(VoA)计算的首选方法,因为它可以有效地描绘颈动脉斑块特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书