Constantinos Koshiaris,Ariel Wang,Lucinda Archer,Richard D Riley,Kym Ie Snell,Richard J Stevens,Amitava Banerjee,Subhashisa Swain,Andrew Clegg,Christopher E Clark,Rupert A Payne,F D Richard Hobbs,Margaret Ogden,Richard J McManus,James P Sheppard,
{"title":"Predicting hypotension, syncope, and fracture risk in patients indicated for antihypertensive treatment: the STRATIFY models.","authors":"Constantinos Koshiaris,Ariel Wang,Lucinda Archer,Richard D Riley,Kym Ie Snell,Richard J Stevens,Amitava Banerjee,Subhashisa Swain,Andrew Clegg,Christopher E Clark,Rupert A Payne,F D Richard Hobbs,Margaret Ogden,Richard J McManus,James P Sheppard, ","doi":"10.1038/s41467-025-64408-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Antihypertensives are associated with increased risk of syncope, hypotension, and fractures, but the highest-risk individuals are unclear. This study aimed to develop and validate three models to predict these outcomes in patients with an indication for antihypertensive treatment. A cohort study was conducted using data from Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). Patients aged 40+ with systolic blood pressure 130-179 mmHg were included. Outcomes were first hypotension, syncope, or fracture leading to hospitalization or death within 10 years. Models were derived from CPRD GOLD data (n = 1,773,224) and validated with CPRD Aurum data (n = 3,805,366). Each model had 31-37 predictors. Validation demonstrated strong discriminative ability (10-year C-statistic: hypotension 0.824; syncope 0.819; fracture 0.790), with close agreement between predicted and observed risks for the hypotension and syncope models. Some underprediction was observed for the fracture model. These models could be used to help reassure patients about the relatively low risk of harm from antihypertensive treatment, or identify the small number of individuals with a higher risk where additional monitoring may be indicated.","PeriodicalId":19066,"journal":{"name":"Nature Communications","volume":"109 1","pages":"9371"},"PeriodicalIF":15.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Communications","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-64408-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Antihypertensives are associated with increased risk of syncope, hypotension, and fractures, but the highest-risk individuals are unclear. This study aimed to develop and validate three models to predict these outcomes in patients with an indication for antihypertensive treatment. A cohort study was conducted using data from Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). Patients aged 40+ with systolic blood pressure 130-179 mmHg were included. Outcomes were first hypotension, syncope, or fracture leading to hospitalization or death within 10 years. Models were derived from CPRD GOLD data (n = 1,773,224) and validated with CPRD Aurum data (n = 3,805,366). Each model had 31-37 predictors. Validation demonstrated strong discriminative ability (10-year C-statistic: hypotension 0.824; syncope 0.819; fracture 0.790), with close agreement between predicted and observed risks for the hypotension and syncope models. Some underprediction was observed for the fracture model. These models could be used to help reassure patients about the relatively low risk of harm from antihypertensive treatment, or identify the small number of individuals with a higher risk where additional monitoring may be indicated.
期刊介绍:
Nature Communications, an open-access journal, publishes high-quality research spanning all areas of the natural sciences. Papers featured in the journal showcase significant advances relevant to specialists in each respective field. With a 2-year impact factor of 16.6 (2022) and a median time of 8 days from submission to the first editorial decision, Nature Communications is committed to rapid dissemination of research findings. As a multidisciplinary journal, it welcomes contributions from biological, health, physical, chemical, Earth, social, mathematical, applied, and engineering sciences, aiming to highlight important breakthroughs within each domain.