Márcio Braite, Natanael de Paula Portilho, Lara Barbosa de Souza Moura Canas Lara, Deivyd Vieira Silva Cavalcante, Enzo Crema Scheffer, Marina Ferreira Machado, Ivo Queiroz Costa Neto, Eline Rozaria Ferreira Barbosa, Giuseppe Tarantini
{"title":"Sentinel Cerebral Protection System in TAVI: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized and Propensity-Matched Studies.","authors":"Márcio Braite, Natanael de Paula Portilho, Lara Barbosa de Souza Moura Canas Lara, Deivyd Vieira Silva Cavalcante, Enzo Crema Scheffer, Marina Ferreira Machado, Ivo Queiroz Costa Neto, Eline Rozaria Ferreira Barbosa, Giuseppe Tarantini","doi":"10.1002/ccd.70236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgrounds: </strong>Stroke remains a serious complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The Sentinel cerebral embolic protection (CEP) system is designed to mitigate this risk by capturing embolic debris, but its clinical benefit remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This meta-analysis evaluated the impact of Sentinel CEP on stroke and related outcomes in TAVI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and propensity score-matched (PSM) studies comparing TAVI with and without Sentinel CEP. The outcomes were periprocedural ischemic stroke, total stroke, disabling stroke, 30-day mortality, in-hospital mortality, composite death or stroke, acute kidney injury (AKI), and major vascular complications. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using a random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight studies (five RCTs, three PSM studies) encompassing 33,111 patients were analyzed, with 50.1% receiving Sentinel. In pooled analysis, Sentinel CEP significantly reduced 30-day mortality (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.58-0.97; p = 0.03) and AKI (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.82-0.98; p = 0.01). No significant effect was observed for periprocedural ischemic stroke (RR 0.92, CI 0.79-1.07; p = 0.28), total stroke (RR 0.79, CI 0.59-1.05; p = 0.10), in-hospital mortality (RR 0.86, CI 0.57-1.31; p = 0.47), composite death or stroke, or major vascular complications. RCT-only analyses confirmed no significant effect on any outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sentinel CEP was associated with lower 30-day mortality and AKI in pooled cohorts, but did not reduce stroke. The absence of benefit in RCTs underscores the need for further studies in high-risk TAVI populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":520583,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.70236","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Backgrounds: Stroke remains a serious complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The Sentinel cerebral embolic protection (CEP) system is designed to mitigate this risk by capturing embolic debris, but its clinical benefit remains uncertain.
Aims: This meta-analysis evaluated the impact of Sentinel CEP on stroke and related outcomes in TAVI.
Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and propensity score-matched (PSM) studies comparing TAVI with and without Sentinel CEP. The outcomes were periprocedural ischemic stroke, total stroke, disabling stroke, 30-day mortality, in-hospital mortality, composite death or stroke, acute kidney injury (AKI), and major vascular complications. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using a random-effects model.
Results: Eight studies (five RCTs, three PSM studies) encompassing 33,111 patients were analyzed, with 50.1% receiving Sentinel. In pooled analysis, Sentinel CEP significantly reduced 30-day mortality (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.58-0.97; p = 0.03) and AKI (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.82-0.98; p = 0.01). No significant effect was observed for periprocedural ischemic stroke (RR 0.92, CI 0.79-1.07; p = 0.28), total stroke (RR 0.79, CI 0.59-1.05; p = 0.10), in-hospital mortality (RR 0.86, CI 0.57-1.31; p = 0.47), composite death or stroke, or major vascular complications. RCT-only analyses confirmed no significant effect on any outcome.
Conclusions: Sentinel CEP was associated with lower 30-day mortality and AKI in pooled cohorts, but did not reduce stroke. The absence of benefit in RCTs underscores the need for further studies in high-risk TAVI populations.
背景:卒中仍然是经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)的一个严重并发症。哨兵脑栓塞保护(CEP)系统旨在通过捕获栓塞碎片来降低这种风险,但其临床益处仍不确定。目的:本荟萃分析评估前哨CEP对TAVI患者卒中及相关结局的影响。方法:检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane中比较TAVI与Sentinel CEP的随机对照试验(rct)和倾向评分匹配(PSM)研究。结果为围手术期缺血性卒中、总卒中、致残性卒中、30天死亡率、住院死亡率、复合死亡或卒中、急性肾损伤(AKI)和主要血管并发症。采用随机效应模型合并95%置信区间的风险比(rr)。结果:8项研究(5项rct, 3项PSM研究)纳入33,111例患者,其中50.1%接受了Sentinel治疗。在合并分析中,Sentinel CEP显著降低了30天死亡率(RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.58-0.97; p = 0.03)和AKI (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.82-0.98; p = 0.01)。围手术期缺血性卒中(RR 0.92, CI 0.79-1.07, p = 0.28)、总卒中(RR 0.79, CI 0.59-1.05, p = 0.10)、住院死亡率(RR 0.86, CI 0.57-1.31, p = 0.47)、复合死亡或卒中或主要血管并发症均无显著影响。仅rct分析证实对任何结果均无显著影响。结论:在合并队列中,前哨CEP与较低的30天死亡率和AKI相关,但没有减少卒中。在随机对照试验中缺乏获益强调了对TAVI高危人群进行进一步研究的必要性。