Sentinel Cerebral Protection System in TAVI: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized and Propensity-Matched Studies.

Márcio Braite, Natanael de Paula Portilho, Lara Barbosa de Souza Moura Canas Lara, Deivyd Vieira Silva Cavalcante, Enzo Crema Scheffer, Marina Ferreira Machado, Ivo Queiroz Costa Neto, Eline Rozaria Ferreira Barbosa, Giuseppe Tarantini
{"title":"Sentinel Cerebral Protection System in TAVI: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized and Propensity-Matched Studies.","authors":"Márcio Braite, Natanael de Paula Portilho, Lara Barbosa de Souza Moura Canas Lara, Deivyd Vieira Silva Cavalcante, Enzo Crema Scheffer, Marina Ferreira Machado, Ivo Queiroz Costa Neto, Eline Rozaria Ferreira Barbosa, Giuseppe Tarantini","doi":"10.1002/ccd.70236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgrounds: </strong>Stroke remains a serious complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The Sentinel cerebral embolic protection (CEP) system is designed to mitigate this risk by capturing embolic debris, but its clinical benefit remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This meta-analysis evaluated the impact of Sentinel CEP on stroke and related outcomes in TAVI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and propensity score-matched (PSM) studies comparing TAVI with and without Sentinel CEP. The outcomes were periprocedural ischemic stroke, total stroke, disabling stroke, 30-day mortality, in-hospital mortality, composite death or stroke, acute kidney injury (AKI), and major vascular complications. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using a random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight studies (five RCTs, three PSM studies) encompassing 33,111 patients were analyzed, with 50.1% receiving Sentinel. In pooled analysis, Sentinel CEP significantly reduced 30-day mortality (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.58-0.97; p = 0.03) and AKI (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.82-0.98; p = 0.01). No significant effect was observed for periprocedural ischemic stroke (RR 0.92, CI 0.79-1.07; p = 0.28), total stroke (RR 0.79, CI 0.59-1.05; p = 0.10), in-hospital mortality (RR 0.86, CI 0.57-1.31; p = 0.47), composite death or stroke, or major vascular complications. RCT-only analyses confirmed no significant effect on any outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sentinel CEP was associated with lower 30-day mortality and AKI in pooled cohorts, but did not reduce stroke. The absence of benefit in RCTs underscores the need for further studies in high-risk TAVI populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":520583,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.70236","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Backgrounds: Stroke remains a serious complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The Sentinel cerebral embolic protection (CEP) system is designed to mitigate this risk by capturing embolic debris, but its clinical benefit remains uncertain.

Aims: This meta-analysis evaluated the impact of Sentinel CEP on stroke and related outcomes in TAVI.

Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and propensity score-matched (PSM) studies comparing TAVI with and without Sentinel CEP. The outcomes were periprocedural ischemic stroke, total stroke, disabling stroke, 30-day mortality, in-hospital mortality, composite death or stroke, acute kidney injury (AKI), and major vascular complications. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using a random-effects model.

Results: Eight studies (five RCTs, three PSM studies) encompassing 33,111 patients were analyzed, with 50.1% receiving Sentinel. In pooled analysis, Sentinel CEP significantly reduced 30-day mortality (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.58-0.97; p = 0.03) and AKI (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.82-0.98; p = 0.01). No significant effect was observed for periprocedural ischemic stroke (RR 0.92, CI 0.79-1.07; p = 0.28), total stroke (RR 0.79, CI 0.59-1.05; p = 0.10), in-hospital mortality (RR 0.86, CI 0.57-1.31; p = 0.47), composite death or stroke, or major vascular complications. RCT-only analyses confirmed no significant effect on any outcome.

Conclusions: Sentinel CEP was associated with lower 30-day mortality and AKI in pooled cohorts, but did not reduce stroke. The absence of benefit in RCTs underscores the need for further studies in high-risk TAVI populations.

TAVI中的前哨脑保护系统:随机和倾向匹配研究的最新荟萃分析。
背景:卒中仍然是经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)的一个严重并发症。哨兵脑栓塞保护(CEP)系统旨在通过捕获栓塞碎片来降低这种风险,但其临床益处仍不确定。目的:本荟萃分析评估前哨CEP对TAVI患者卒中及相关结局的影响。方法:检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane中比较TAVI与Sentinel CEP的随机对照试验(rct)和倾向评分匹配(PSM)研究。结果为围手术期缺血性卒中、总卒中、致残性卒中、30天死亡率、住院死亡率、复合死亡或卒中、急性肾损伤(AKI)和主要血管并发症。采用随机效应模型合并95%置信区间的风险比(rr)。结果:8项研究(5项rct, 3项PSM研究)纳入33,111例患者,其中50.1%接受了Sentinel治疗。在合并分析中,Sentinel CEP显著降低了30天死亡率(RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.58-0.97; p = 0.03)和AKI (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.82-0.98; p = 0.01)。围手术期缺血性卒中(RR 0.92, CI 0.79-1.07, p = 0.28)、总卒中(RR 0.79, CI 0.59-1.05, p = 0.10)、住院死亡率(RR 0.86, CI 0.57-1.31, p = 0.47)、复合死亡或卒中或主要血管并发症均无显著影响。仅rct分析证实对任何结果均无显著影响。结论:在合并队列中,前哨CEP与较低的30天死亡率和AKI相关,但没有减少卒中。在随机对照试验中缺乏获益强调了对TAVI高危人群进行进一步研究的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信