Comparative Visual Analysis of Coronary Slow Flow and Myocardial Blush Grade in Relation to Invasive Testing for Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction.

Andrew P Hill, Ryan L Wallace, Abhishek Chaturvedi, Flavia Tejada Frisancho, Matteo Cellamare, Vaishnavi Sawant, Sevket Ozturk, Vijoli Cermak, Cheng Zhang, Ron Waksman, Hayder D Hashim, Brian C Case
{"title":"Comparative Visual Analysis of Coronary Slow Flow and Myocardial Blush Grade in Relation to Invasive Testing for Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction.","authors":"Andrew P Hill, Ryan L Wallace, Abhishek Chaturvedi, Flavia Tejada Frisancho, Matteo Cellamare, Vaishnavi Sawant, Sevket Ozturk, Vijoli Cermak, Cheng Zhang, Ron Waksman, Hayder D Hashim, Brian C Case","doi":"10.1002/ccd.70246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Angiographic coronary slow flow (CSF) has been correlated with coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) and abnormal myocardial blush grade (MBG) has been associated with worse outcomes in acute myocardial infarction. Their validity has not been compared with newer invasive forms of coronary functional CMD testing. Therefore, we aimed to investigate whether angiographic assessment of CSF and MBG correlate with gold-standard invasive assessments of CMD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the Coronary Microvascular Disease Registry (NCT05960474), we identified patients with angina and non-obstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA) who underwent invasive coronary functional testing (CFT) between August 2021 and August 2024. CMD was defined as coronary flow reserve (CFR) < 2.5 with an index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) > 25 using invasive bolus thermodilution technique. CSF was defined as > 3 cardiac cycles for distal opacification of vessels with contrast. Slow Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction frame count (TFC) was defined as a corrected frame count of > 25. MBG was categorized as abnormal (Grade 0 or 1). Rates of abnormal CSF and MBG were compared between the CMD-positive and negative groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 304 patients were included, of whom 81 (26.6%) were CMD positive. Patients were predominantly female (67.9 vs. 63.7%, p = 0.50) and slightly older (64.0 ± 11.3 vs. 60.6 ± 10.8 years, p = 0.02) with a lower BMI (28.5 ± 5.7 vs. 31.6 ± 6.9; p < 0.001) in the CMD positive group. Common comorbidities included hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes with a similar prevalence in both groups. There was no difference between CMD-positive and negative groups for CSF, (8.6% vs. 4.9%, p = 0.23) or slow cTFC (14.8% vs. 15.7%, p = 0.85). Additionally, the rate of abnormal MBG was similar in both groups (1.3% vs. 3.1%; p = 0.37).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that, while readily available and previously used for diagnosis, the angiographic findings of CSF and MBG do not reliably indicate the presence of CMD in ANOCA patients. Therefore, dedicated CFT should be pursued if there is clinical suspicion of CMD.</p>","PeriodicalId":520583,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.70246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Angiographic coronary slow flow (CSF) has been correlated with coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) and abnormal myocardial blush grade (MBG) has been associated with worse outcomes in acute myocardial infarction. Their validity has not been compared with newer invasive forms of coronary functional CMD testing. Therefore, we aimed to investigate whether angiographic assessment of CSF and MBG correlate with gold-standard invasive assessments of CMD.

Methods: Using the Coronary Microvascular Disease Registry (NCT05960474), we identified patients with angina and non-obstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA) who underwent invasive coronary functional testing (CFT) between August 2021 and August 2024. CMD was defined as coronary flow reserve (CFR) < 2.5 with an index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) > 25 using invasive bolus thermodilution technique. CSF was defined as > 3 cardiac cycles for distal opacification of vessels with contrast. Slow Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction frame count (TFC) was defined as a corrected frame count of > 25. MBG was categorized as abnormal (Grade 0 or 1). Rates of abnormal CSF and MBG were compared between the CMD-positive and negative groups.

Results: A total of 304 patients were included, of whom 81 (26.6%) were CMD positive. Patients were predominantly female (67.9 vs. 63.7%, p = 0.50) and slightly older (64.0 ± 11.3 vs. 60.6 ± 10.8 years, p = 0.02) with a lower BMI (28.5 ± 5.7 vs. 31.6 ± 6.9; p < 0.001) in the CMD positive group. Common comorbidities included hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes with a similar prevalence in both groups. There was no difference between CMD-positive and negative groups for CSF, (8.6% vs. 4.9%, p = 0.23) or slow cTFC (14.8% vs. 15.7%, p = 0.85). Additionally, the rate of abnormal MBG was similar in both groups (1.3% vs. 3.1%; p = 0.37).

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that, while readily available and previously used for diagnosis, the angiographic findings of CSF and MBG do not reliably indicate the presence of CMD in ANOCA patients. Therefore, dedicated CFT should be pursued if there is clinical suspicion of CMD.

冠脉慢血流和心肌红晕分级与冠脉微血管功能障碍有创检测的视觉对比分析。
背景:冠状动脉慢血流(CSF)与冠状动脉微血管功能障碍(CMD)相关,心肌红晕等级(MBG)异常与急性心肌梗死的不良结局相关。其有效性尚未与较新的有创冠状动脉功能CMD测试形式进行比较。因此,我们的目的是研究脑脊液和MBG的血管造影评估是否与CMD的金标准侵入性评估相关。方法:使用冠状动脉微血管疾病登记处(NCT05960474),我们确定了2021年8月至2024年8月期间接受有创冠状动脉功能测试(CFT)的心绞痛和非阻塞性冠状动脉(ANOCA)患者。CMD定义为冠脉血流储备(CFR) 25。对于远端血管造影剂混浊,脑脊液被定义为>.3心跳周期。心肌梗死慢溶栓帧数(TFC)定义为校正后的帧数bbb25。MBG为异常(0级或1级)。比较cd阳性组和阴性组脑脊液和MBG异常率。结果:共纳入304例患者,其中CMD阳性81例(26.6%)。患者以女性为主(67.9 vs. 63.7%, p = 0.50),年龄稍大(64.0±11.3 vs. 60.6±10.8,p = 0.02), BMI较低(28.5±5.7 vs. 31.6±6.9)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,虽然脑脊液和MBG的血管造影结果很容易获得,并且以前用于诊断,但不能可靠地指示ANOCA患者是否存在CMD。因此,如果临床怀疑CMD,应进行专门的CFT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信