Contraceptive Knowledge and Counseling among OB-GYN and Family Medicine Physicians.

Kansas journal of medicine Pub Date : 2025-10-15 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.17161/kjm.vol18.23954
Nicole Thurman, Rachna Gulati, Jennifer Keomany, Mallory Lehr, Hayrettin Okut, Ashley Robbins
{"title":"Contraceptive Knowledge and Counseling among OB-GYN and Family Medicine Physicians.","authors":"Nicole Thurman, Rachna Gulati, Jennifer Keomany, Mallory Lehr, Hayrettin Okut, Ashley Robbins","doi":"10.17161/kjm.vol18.23954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Few studies have examined contraceptive knowledge and counseling confidence among primary care residents and physicians. Authors of this study evaluated education, knowledge, and counseling practices related to contraception among physicians in obstetrics and gynecology (OB-GYN) and family medicine (FM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective, cross-sectional study, current OB-GYN and FM residents, as well as program graduates from the past five years at a single institution, were surveyed. The survey assessed demographics, contraception knowledge, provider confidence, counseling practices, and procedural experience. Responses were included in the analysis if at least one knowledge question was completed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final analysis included 45 respondents (8% response rate): 33.3% (n = 15) from FM and 66.7% (n = 30) from OB-GYN. Average knowledge scores did not differ significantly between FM (60%, 12/20) and OB-GYN physicians (70%, 14/20). Attending physicians' average scores were significantly higher (85%, 17/20) than residents (60%, 12/20; p = 0.0014). Most respondents (97.8%, n = 44) reported feeling comfortable counseling patients, and 93.3% (n = 42) felt comfortable performing procedures and prescribing contraceptives. OB-GYN physicians reported greater comfort placing levonorgestrel and Paragard® intrauterine devices (IUDs) than FM physicians (93%, n = 14 vs. 61%, n = 11; p = 0.040). More OB-GYN physicians (6.7%, n = 3) reported performing over 80 Nexplanon® insertions compared to FM physicians (0.0%, n = 0; p <0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Contraceptive knowledge did not differ significantly between OB-GYN and FM physicians. However, advanced training was associated with greater comfort in both prescribing and performing contraceptive procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":94121,"journal":{"name":"Kansas journal of medicine","volume":"18 5","pages":"115-118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12539767/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kansas journal of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17161/kjm.vol18.23954","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Few studies have examined contraceptive knowledge and counseling confidence among primary care residents and physicians. Authors of this study evaluated education, knowledge, and counseling practices related to contraception among physicians in obstetrics and gynecology (OB-GYN) and family medicine (FM).

Methods: In this prospective, cross-sectional study, current OB-GYN and FM residents, as well as program graduates from the past five years at a single institution, were surveyed. The survey assessed demographics, contraception knowledge, provider confidence, counseling practices, and procedural experience. Responses were included in the analysis if at least one knowledge question was completed.

Results: The final analysis included 45 respondents (8% response rate): 33.3% (n = 15) from FM and 66.7% (n = 30) from OB-GYN. Average knowledge scores did not differ significantly between FM (60%, 12/20) and OB-GYN physicians (70%, 14/20). Attending physicians' average scores were significantly higher (85%, 17/20) than residents (60%, 12/20; p = 0.0014). Most respondents (97.8%, n = 44) reported feeling comfortable counseling patients, and 93.3% (n = 42) felt comfortable performing procedures and prescribing contraceptives. OB-GYN physicians reported greater comfort placing levonorgestrel and Paragard® intrauterine devices (IUDs) than FM physicians (93%, n = 14 vs. 61%, n = 11; p = 0.040). More OB-GYN physicians (6.7%, n = 3) reported performing over 80 Nexplanon® insertions compared to FM physicians (0.0%, n = 0; p <0.0001).

Conclusions: Contraceptive knowledge did not differ significantly between OB-GYN and FM physicians. However, advanced training was associated with greater comfort in both prescribing and performing contraceptive procedures.

妇产科和家庭医生的避孕知识与咨询。
引言:很少有研究调查避孕知识和咨询信心的初级保健居民和医生。本研究的作者评估了妇产科(OB-GYN)和家庭医学(FM)医生在避孕方面的教育、知识和咨询实践。方法:在这项前瞻性横断面研究中,调查了现有的妇产科和FM住院医生,以及过去五年在单一机构的项目毕业生。该调查评估了人口统计、避孕知识、提供者信心、咨询实践和程序经验。如果至少完成了一个知识问题,回答将被纳入分析。结果:调查对象45人,回复率8%,其中FM占33.3% (n = 15), OB-GYN占66.7% (n = 30)。FM医生(60%,12/20)和OB-GYN医生(70%,14/20)的平均知识得分无显著差异。主治医师的平均得分(85%,17/20)显著高于住院医师(60%,12/20,p = 0.0014)。大多数受访者(97.8%,n = 44)表示对咨询患者感到舒适,93.3% (n = 42)表示对执行手术和处方避孕药感到舒适。妇产科医生报告说,与FM医生相比,使用左炔诺孕酮和Paragard®宫内节育器(IUDs)更舒适(93%,n = 14 vs 61%, n = 11; p = 0.040)。与FM医生相比,更多的妇产科医生(6.7%,n = 3)报告进行了超过80次的Nexplanon®插入手术(0.0%,n = 0; p)。结论:避孕知识在妇产科医生和FM医生之间没有显著差异。然而,高级培训与更舒适的处方和执行避孕程序有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书