Stacey Oliver, Rebecca Jamwal, Kate DCruz, Naismith Jacqui, Di Winkler, Jacinta Douglas
{"title":"How do people with disability and complex needs experience the built environment in apartments designed for people with disability?","authors":"Stacey Oliver, Rebecca Jamwal, Kate DCruz, Naismith Jacqui, Di Winkler, Jacinta Douglas","doi":"10.1111/1440-1630.70051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Despite evidence supporting the benefits of individualised disability housing, the extent to which the built environment in these housing models meets the needs of tenants with disability and complex needs remains unclear. One form of individualised housing includes apartments designed for people with disability peppered throughout larger apartment complexes. In this study, we aimed to explore the experience of the built environment for people living in these apartments.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Thirteen adults with disabilities and complex needs (Ehlers–Danlos syndrome = 3; cerebral palsy = 1; spinal cord injury = 1; neuromuscular disorder = 1; multiple sclerosis = 2; other neurological = 4; and other = 1) who had been residing in apartments for 6 months undertook semi-structured interviews. Interviews were guided by the residential interview component of the Residential Environment Impact Scale, Version 4.0. Using grounded theory principles, the interview transcripts were analysed through a process of data-driven open and focussed coding.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Consumer and Community Involvement</h3>\n \n <p>Consumers and community members were not involved in the development or implementation of the research or writing of the manuscript.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>The analysis revealed four overarching themes: (1) having adequate space to meet needs; (2) requiring accessible design; (3) integrating technology into the built environment; and (4) regulating the sensory space. Central to experiences was participants' sense of autonomy within the built environment. Moreover, participants emphasised the importance of design elements and social systems within which these apartments are situated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The findings underscore the pivotal role the built environment plays in shaping the lives of tenants with disabilities and complex needs. They also highlight early challenges and opportunities to improve the adaptability and functionality of apartments designed for people with disabilities. Recommendations include enhancing the integration of home automation and assistive technologies and ensuring prospective tenants have clear information about their tenancy, including constraints specific to the built environment of apartment living.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55418,"journal":{"name":"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal","volume":"72 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12540929/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1440-1630.70051","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Despite evidence supporting the benefits of individualised disability housing, the extent to which the built environment in these housing models meets the needs of tenants with disability and complex needs remains unclear. One form of individualised housing includes apartments designed for people with disability peppered throughout larger apartment complexes. In this study, we aimed to explore the experience of the built environment for people living in these apartments.
Methods
Thirteen adults with disabilities and complex needs (Ehlers–Danlos syndrome = 3; cerebral palsy = 1; spinal cord injury = 1; neuromuscular disorder = 1; multiple sclerosis = 2; other neurological = 4; and other = 1) who had been residing in apartments for 6 months undertook semi-structured interviews. Interviews were guided by the residential interview component of the Residential Environment Impact Scale, Version 4.0. Using grounded theory principles, the interview transcripts were analysed through a process of data-driven open and focussed coding.
Consumer and Community Involvement
Consumers and community members were not involved in the development or implementation of the research or writing of the manuscript.
Findings
The analysis revealed four overarching themes: (1) having adequate space to meet needs; (2) requiring accessible design; (3) integrating technology into the built environment; and (4) regulating the sensory space. Central to experiences was participants' sense of autonomy within the built environment. Moreover, participants emphasised the importance of design elements and social systems within which these apartments are situated.
Conclusion
The findings underscore the pivotal role the built environment plays in shaping the lives of tenants with disabilities and complex needs. They also highlight early challenges and opportunities to improve the adaptability and functionality of apartments designed for people with disabilities. Recommendations include enhancing the integration of home automation and assistive technologies and ensuring prospective tenants have clear information about their tenancy, including constraints specific to the built environment of apartment living.
期刊介绍:
The Australian Occupational Therapy Journal is a leading international peer reviewed publication presenting influential, high quality innovative scholarship and research relevant to occupational therapy. The aim of the journal is to be a leader in the dissemination of scholarship and evidence to substantiate, influence and shape policy and occupational therapy practice locally and globally. The journal publishes empirical studies, theoretical papers, and reviews. Preference will be given to manuscripts that have a sound theoretical basis, methodological rigour with sufficient scope and scale to make important new contributions to the occupational therapy body of knowledge. AOTJ does not publish protocols for any study design
The journal will consider multidisciplinary or interprofessional studies that include occupational therapy, occupational therapists or occupational therapy students, so long as ‘key points’ highlight the specific implications for occupational therapy, occupational therapists and/or occupational therapy students and/or consumers.