Development of a New Measure of Intergenerational Contact.

IF 1.7 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Shelbie G Turner, Karen Hooker, Shannon E Jarrott, G John Geldhof
{"title":"Development of a New Measure of Intergenerational Contact.","authors":"Shelbie G Turner, Karen Hooker, Shannon E Jarrott, G John Geldhof","doi":"10.1007/s10804-025-09525-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intergenerational relationships are vital for individuals of all ages, with positive outcomes associated with intergenerational contact in both familial and non-familial contexts. To explore the role of intergenerational contact in adult development and evaluate the impact of intergenerational programs, a reliable measure of intergenerational contact (IGC) is essential. This study details a three-phase project aimed at creating and validating a measure of familial and non-familial IGC contact. We first conducted a Delphi review with intergenerational researchers (<i>n</i> = 8) and practitioners (<i>n</i> = 8), followed by three focus groups to gather insights on the measure's content, clarity, and feasibility. We then utilized data from 364 younger adults, 250 middle-aged adults, and 331 older adults to run a multi-group confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) testing configural, metric, and scalar invariance for both the familial and non-familial scales across the three age groups. The Delphi review achieved moderate to high consensus on the initial survey draft, with qualitative feedback guiding revisions. Subsequent focus-group insights enhanced the measure's clarity and coverage. Confirmatory factor analyses confirmed an eight-item, two-factor structure reflecting positive and negative intergenerational contact, demonstrating configural and metric invariance for both familial and non-familial subscales. Notably, only the non-familial subscale achieved scalar invariance, providing evidence for the IGC Measure as a valuable tool for assessing intergenerational contact across the adult lifespan, aiding researchers in understanding its significance, and enabling practitioners to evaluate intergenerational programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":51546,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Adult Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12536304/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Adult Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-025-09525-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intergenerational relationships are vital for individuals of all ages, with positive outcomes associated with intergenerational contact in both familial and non-familial contexts. To explore the role of intergenerational contact in adult development and evaluate the impact of intergenerational programs, a reliable measure of intergenerational contact (IGC) is essential. This study details a three-phase project aimed at creating and validating a measure of familial and non-familial IGC contact. We first conducted a Delphi review with intergenerational researchers (n = 8) and practitioners (n = 8), followed by three focus groups to gather insights on the measure's content, clarity, and feasibility. We then utilized data from 364 younger adults, 250 middle-aged adults, and 331 older adults to run a multi-group confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) testing configural, metric, and scalar invariance for both the familial and non-familial scales across the three age groups. The Delphi review achieved moderate to high consensus on the initial survey draft, with qualitative feedback guiding revisions. Subsequent focus-group insights enhanced the measure's clarity and coverage. Confirmatory factor analyses confirmed an eight-item, two-factor structure reflecting positive and negative intergenerational contact, demonstrating configural and metric invariance for both familial and non-familial subscales. Notably, only the non-familial subscale achieved scalar invariance, providing evidence for the IGC Measure as a valuable tool for assessing intergenerational contact across the adult lifespan, aiding researchers in understanding its significance, and enabling practitioners to evaluate intergenerational programs.

代际接触新测量方法的发展。
代际关系对所有年龄段的人都是至关重要的,在家庭和非家庭环境中,代际关系都与积极的结果相关。为了探索代际接触在成人发展中的作用,评估代际接触项目的影响,一个可靠的代际接触(IGC)测量是必不可少的。这项研究详细介绍了一个旨在创建和验证家族和非家族IGC接触测量的三期项目。我们首先对代际研究人员(n = 8)和实践者(n = 8)进行了德尔菲评估,然后进行了三个焦点小组的调查,以收集对该措施的内容、清晰度和可行性的见解。然后,我们利用来自364名年轻人、250名中年人和331名老年人的数据,对三个年龄组的家族性和非家族性量表进行多组验证性因子分析(CFA),测试结构、度量和标量不变性。德尔菲评价在初步调查草案上取得了中等到高度的共识,并有定性反馈指导修订。随后的焦点小组洞察提高了衡量标准的清晰度和覆盖面。验证性因子分析证实了一个八项双因子结构,反映了积极和消极的代际接触,证明了家族和非家族子量表的结构和度量不变。值得注意的是,只有非家族子量表实现了标量不变性,这为IGC测量作为评估成人一生中代际接触的有价值工具提供了证据,帮助研究人员理解其重要性,并使从业者能够评估代际项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Adult Development
Journal of Adult Development PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: The Journal of Adult Development is an interdisciplinary journal covering development in early adulthood, midlife, and later adulthood. The Journal supports innovative theoretical and empirical articles that help direct the future of our field. Critical issues include the importance of life-long education, work and family changes, and physical and mental health influencing adult development. In addition, the impact of personality, emotions, cognition, and biomarkers are areas of interest. The Journal of Adult Development emphasizes the importance of interindividual differences and contextual issues influencing adult development. Interventions that promote optimal development throughout the adult life span are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书