Spatial and spatiotemporal machine learning models for COVID-19 dynamics: a review of methodology and reporting practices.

IF 9.6 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Hassan K Ajulo, Faith O Alele, Theophilus I Emeto, Oyelola A Adegboye
{"title":"Spatial and spatiotemporal machine learning models for COVID-19 dynamics: a review of methodology and reporting practices.","authors":"Hassan K Ajulo, Faith O Alele, Theophilus I Emeto, Oyelola A Adegboye","doi":"10.1093/epirev/mxaf017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>COVID-19 has transitioned from a pandemic to an endemic state, but the emergence of novel variants continues to pose significant public health challenges. In this study, the application of spatial and spatiotemporal machine learning (ML) models in understanding the dynamics of COVID-19 was systematically reviewed, as were contextual local-level comprehensive socio-environmental drivers. A systematic search was conducted across the Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, Emcare (via Ovid), and the World Health Organization COVID-19 databases, and gray literature, adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Data extraction was conducted according to the Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modeling Studies checklist, and study quality was assessed using a validated scoring system. A total of 42 studies met the inclusion criteria. The review Findings indicate that global-scale spatial and spatiotemporal ML models dominate the field. Long-standing standalone factors in the demographic, environmental, and socioeconomic domains are frequently used as local-level drivers. However, the integration of composite indicators, aggregating multiple standalone factors into a single score, is notably lacking. Such composite indicators have the potential to reduce model complexity, improve interpretability, and enhance performance by capturing multidimensional aspects of vulnerability or risk in a more simplified form. This review highlights critical gaps in the current use of spatial and spatiotemporal ML models to understand the spatial epidemiology of COVID-19. Addressing these gaps could significantly enhance the understanding of COVID-19 dynamics and inform the development of effective public health strategies to mitigate future threats.</p>","PeriodicalId":50510,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiologic Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12699224/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiologic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/epirev/mxaf017","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

COVID-19 has transitioned from a pandemic to an endemic state, but the emergence of novel variants continues to pose significant public health challenges. In this study, the application of spatial and spatiotemporal machine learning (ML) models in understanding the dynamics of COVID-19 was systematically reviewed, as were contextual local-level comprehensive socio-environmental drivers. A systematic search was conducted across the Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, Emcare (via Ovid), and the World Health Organization COVID-19 databases, and gray literature, adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Data extraction was conducted according to the Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modeling Studies checklist, and study quality was assessed using a validated scoring system. A total of 42 studies met the inclusion criteria. The review Findings indicate that global-scale spatial and spatiotemporal ML models dominate the field. Long-standing standalone factors in the demographic, environmental, and socioeconomic domains are frequently used as local-level drivers. However, the integration of composite indicators, aggregating multiple standalone factors into a single score, is notably lacking. Such composite indicators have the potential to reduce model complexity, improve interpretability, and enhance performance by capturing multidimensional aspects of vulnerability or risk in a more simplified form. This review highlights critical gaps in the current use of spatial and spatiotemporal ML models to understand the spatial epidemiology of COVID-19. Addressing these gaps could significantly enhance the understanding of COVID-19 dynamics and inform the development of effective public health strategies to mitigate future threats.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

COVID-19动态的空间和时空机器学习模型:方法和报告实践综述
COVID-19已从大流行过渡到流行状态,但新变体的出现继续构成重大的公共卫生挑战。本研究旨在系统回顾空间和时空机器学习(ML)模型在理解COVID-19动态方面的应用,以及在人口、社会经济、环境、流行病学、医疗保健、住房、行为、疫苗接种、政府政策和流动性领域的地方驱动因素。遵循PRISMA指南,对Scopus、Web of Science、PubMed、Emcare(通过Ovid)、WHO COVID-19数据库和灰色文献进行了系统检索。根据预测建模研究系统评价的关键评价和数据提取清单进行数据提取,并使用经过验证的评分系统评估研究质量。共有42项研究符合纳入标准。综述结果表明,全球尺度的空间和时空ML模型在该领域占主导地位。人口、环境和社会经济领域的长期独立因素经常被用作地方一级的驱动因素。然而,将多个独立因素整合为一个分数的综合指标的整合明显缺乏。这种复合指标有可能降低模型的复杂性,提高可解释性,并通过以更简化的形式捕获脆弱性或风险的多维方面来提高性能。这篇综述强调了目前在使用空间和时空ML模型来理解COVID-19空间流行病学方面的关键差距。解决这些差距可以大大加强对COVID-19动态的了解,并为制定有效的公共卫生战略提供信息,以减轻未来的威胁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epidemiologic Reviews
Epidemiologic Reviews 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: Epidemiologic Reviews is a leading review journal in public health. Published once a year, issues collect review articles on a particular subject. Recent issues have focused on The Obesity Epidemic, Epidemiologic Research on Health Disparities, and Epidemiologic Approaches to Global Health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书