Gadamer, Habermas and Ricoeur: Toward a Hermeneutic Philosophy of Care.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
José Ricardo C M Ayres
{"title":"Gadamer, Habermas and Ricoeur: Toward a Hermeneutic Philosophy of Care.","authors":"José Ricardo C M Ayres","doi":"10.1111/nup.70049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This essay builds upon the dialogue with Missel and Birkelund's reflections on the contributions of contemporary hermeneutics-particularly the work of Paul Ricoeur-to health research. While endorsing these authors' central thesis, the present discussion seeks to extend the argument by advocating for hermeneutics' relevance to clinical practice as well. Drawing on the ideas of Gadamer, Ricoeur, and Habermas, the text critiques the excessive hegemony of techno-scientific knowledge over clinical practice and its harmful consequences for outcomes. It argues that revisiting Aristotle's distinction between theoria, techne, and praxis and fostering a genuine synergy among these spheres of rationality represents a potential hermeneutic contribution to the emancipatory reconstruction of health practices. The concept of Care is adopted as the philosophical horizon for this critical-hermeneutic reconstruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":49724,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Philosophy","volume":"26 4","pages":"e70049"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12539786/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.70049","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This essay builds upon the dialogue with Missel and Birkelund's reflections on the contributions of contemporary hermeneutics-particularly the work of Paul Ricoeur-to health research. While endorsing these authors' central thesis, the present discussion seeks to extend the argument by advocating for hermeneutics' relevance to clinical practice as well. Drawing on the ideas of Gadamer, Ricoeur, and Habermas, the text critiques the excessive hegemony of techno-scientific knowledge over clinical practice and its harmful consequences for outcomes. It argues that revisiting Aristotle's distinction between theoria, techne, and praxis and fostering a genuine synergy among these spheres of rationality represents a potential hermeneutic contribution to the emancipatory reconstruction of health practices. The concept of Care is adopted as the philosophical horizon for this critical-hermeneutic reconstruction.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

伽达默尔、哈贝马斯和利科:走向关怀的解释学哲学。
这篇文章建立在与米塞尔和伯克伦的对话之上,他们对当代解释学的贡献——尤其是保罗·里科尔对健康研究的贡献——进行了反思。在赞同这些作者的中心论点的同时,目前的讨论试图通过提倡解释学与临床实践的相关性来扩展论点。借鉴伽达默尔、利科尔和哈贝马斯的思想,本文批评了技术科学知识对临床实践的过度霸权及其对结果的有害后果。它认为,重新审视亚里士多德对理论,技术和实践的区分,并在这些理性领域之间培养真正的协同作用,代表了对卫生实践解放重建的潜在解释学贡献。关怀的概念被采纳为这种批判解释学重建的哲学视界。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
39
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Philosophy provides a forum for discussion of philosophical issues in nursing. These focus on questions relating to the nature of nursing and to the phenomena of key relevance to it. For example, any understanding of what nursing is presupposes some conception of just what nurses are trying to do when they nurse. But what are the ends of nursing? Are they to promote health, prevent disease, promote well-being, enhance autonomy, relieve suffering, or some combination of these? How are these ends are to be met? What kind of knowledge is needed in order to nurse? Practical, theoretical, aesthetic, moral, political, ''intuitive'' or some other? Papers that explore other aspects of philosophical enquiry and analysis of relevance to nursing (and any other healthcare or social care activity) are also welcome and might include, but not be limited to, critical discussions of the work of nurse theorists who have advanced philosophical claims (e.g., Benner, Benner and Wrubel, Carper, Schrok, Watson, Parse and so on) as well as critical engagement with philosophers (e.g., Heidegger, Husserl, Kuhn, Polanyi, Taylor, MacIntyre and so on) whose work informs health care in general and nursing in particular.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书