{"title":"A Study of Deep Clustering in Spike Sorting.","authors":"Eugen-Richard Ardelean, Raluca Laura Portase","doi":"10.1007/s12021-025-09751-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Spike sorting is the process of identifying the source neurons for neuronal activity recorded from extracellular electrodes. Traditional spike sorting pipelines separate the process into distinct feature extraction and clustering steps, which may not optimally capture the complex structure of spike data. This study provides a large-scale benchmark of 12 deep clustering algorithms against traditional feature extraction methods combined with K-means clustering for spike sorting. We analyze performance across 95 synthetic datasets with varying cluster counts (2-20) and complexity from the perspective of six performance metrics. Our results demonstrate that a subset of deep clustering algorithms—particularly ACeDeC, DDC, DEC, IDEC and VaDE—significantly outperform traditional methods, especially as dataset complexity increases. These deep clustering approaches effectively learn non-linear representations that better capture the structure of spike data while simultaneously optimizing clustering objectives. This dual optimization produces feature spaces tailored for clustering, combining the two traditionally separate steps of spike sorting. Our findings indicate that deep clustering approaches are most suitable for accurately identifying individual neuronal activity in extracellular recordings, providing guidance for method selection for the increasingly complex modern multi-electrode recordings.</p>","PeriodicalId":49761,"journal":{"name":"Neuroinformatics","volume":"23 4","pages":"51"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12546415/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12021-025-09751-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Spike sorting is the process of identifying the source neurons for neuronal activity recorded from extracellular electrodes. Traditional spike sorting pipelines separate the process into distinct feature extraction and clustering steps, which may not optimally capture the complex structure of spike data. This study provides a large-scale benchmark of 12 deep clustering algorithms against traditional feature extraction methods combined with K-means clustering for spike sorting. We analyze performance across 95 synthetic datasets with varying cluster counts (2-20) and complexity from the perspective of six performance metrics. Our results demonstrate that a subset of deep clustering algorithms—particularly ACeDeC, DDC, DEC, IDEC and VaDE—significantly outperform traditional methods, especially as dataset complexity increases. These deep clustering approaches effectively learn non-linear representations that better capture the structure of spike data while simultaneously optimizing clustering objectives. This dual optimization produces feature spaces tailored for clustering, combining the two traditionally separate steps of spike sorting. Our findings indicate that deep clustering approaches are most suitable for accurately identifying individual neuronal activity in extracellular recordings, providing guidance for method selection for the increasingly complex modern multi-electrode recordings.
期刊介绍:
Neuroinformatics publishes original articles and reviews with an emphasis on data structure and software tools related to analysis, modeling, integration, and sharing in all areas of neuroscience research. The editors particularly invite contributions on: (1) Theory and methodology, including discussions on ontologies, modeling approaches, database design, and meta-analyses; (2) Descriptions of developed databases and software tools, and of the methods for their distribution; (3) Relevant experimental results, such as reports accompanie by the release of massive data sets; (4) Computational simulations of models integrating and organizing complex data; and (5) Neuroengineering approaches, including hardware, robotics, and information theory studies.