Tables turned on table talk

IF 1.8 2区哲学 Q1 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-21 DOI:10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.102081

Majid D. Beni

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Eliminative structural realism is in line with mereological nihilism. This contrasts with reconciliatory, non-eliminativist versions of structural realism, such as rainforest realism, which aim to accommodate quotidian ontology. Recently, the ordinary object ontology of rainforest realism has been defended by drawing on cognitive sciences. This paper critically examines philosophical arguments and scientific evidence, particularly from predictive processing, to argue that these sources do not support the ontology of ordinary objects but instead favour an organism-oriented form of eliminativist structural realism.

查看原文本刊更多论文

餐桌上的谈话改变了局面。

消除结构现实主义与流变虚无主义是一致的。这与结构现实主义的和解、非消除主义版本形成鲜明对比，例如雨林现实主义，其目的是适应日常本体论。近年来，热带雨林现实主义的普通对象本体论得到了认知科学的辩护。本文批判性地考察了哲学论点和科学证据，特别是来自预测处理的证据，认为这些来源不支持普通物体的本体论，而是支持一种以生物体为导向的消除主义结构现实主义形式。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 管理科学-科学史与科学哲学

CiteScore

2.50

自引率

10.00%

发文量

166

审稿时长

6.6 weeks

期刊介绍： Studies in History and Philosophy of Science is devoted to the integrated study of the history, philosophy and sociology of the sciences. The editors encourage contributions both in the long-established areas of the history of the sciences and the philosophy of the sciences and in the topical areas of historiography of the sciences, the sciences in relation to gender, culture and society and the sciences in relation to arts. The Journal is international in scope and content and publishes papers from a wide range of countries and cultural traditions.