{"title":"Prevention of preeclampsia by aspirin consumption in high-risk pregnancies that can be complicated with preeclampsia: A systematic review.","authors":"Somayeh Khanjani, Maryam Hajihashemy, Maryam Hashemi, Minoo Movahedi, Farinaz Farahbod, Sima Aliyari, Fateme Abbasi, Hatav Ghasemi Tehrani","doi":"10.4103/jrms.jrms_565_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>For a long time, it has been proposed that aspirin might have a preventive property to reduce the risk of preeclampsia; however, recent assessments have changed the insights toward this medication. The current qualitative systematic review aims to thoroughly assess the outcomes of treatment with aspirin in high-risk preeclampsia women.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The scope of this study was to evaluate: (1) the preventive role of treatment with aspirin on high-risk pregnancies for preeclampsia, (2) the applied dose on the incidence of preeclampsia, (3) the outcome of using aspirin alone versus in combination with an anticoagulant, and (4) the outcome of aspirin discontinuation on the incidence of preeclampsia. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase databases were searched from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2023. English-written studies with trial designs (randomized or nonrandomized) assessing the use of aspirin on preeclampsia prevention among high-risk women for this phenomenon were included. Three authors independently surfed the databases and selected the studies; in case of any disagreement, the problem was resolved by the fourth author. Then, the papers were fully screened and those that met the study criteria were individually evaluated. The revised JBI critical appraisal tool for the assessment of risk of bias for randomized controlled trials was applied categorizing the studies into low-moderate and high risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Finally, data from twenty-three studies on 15,764 high-risk preeclampsia individuals with singleton pregnancies were extracted. Fourteen, 4, and 5 studies had low, moderate, and high risk of bias. Aspirin use regardless of its dosage was not remarkably associated with reduced risk of preeclampsia in the majority of studies. Besides, the time of initiation or discontinuation did not affect the outcomes. Moreover, aspirin combination with anticoagulant was not necessarily superior over aspirin alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on our findings, the body of evidence majorly found no remarkable role for prophylactic aspirin use to prevent preeclampsia incidence at any time during pregnancy; however, promising data, particularly in higher doses and earlier initiation of aspirin, have been noted.</p>","PeriodicalId":50062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Medical Sciences","volume":"30 ","pages":"49"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12536866/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jrms.jrms_565_24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: For a long time, it has been proposed that aspirin might have a preventive property to reduce the risk of preeclampsia; however, recent assessments have changed the insights toward this medication. The current qualitative systematic review aims to thoroughly assess the outcomes of treatment with aspirin in high-risk preeclampsia women.
Materials and methods: The scope of this study was to evaluate: (1) the preventive role of treatment with aspirin on high-risk pregnancies for preeclampsia, (2) the applied dose on the incidence of preeclampsia, (3) the outcome of using aspirin alone versus in combination with an anticoagulant, and (4) the outcome of aspirin discontinuation on the incidence of preeclampsia. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase databases were searched from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2023. English-written studies with trial designs (randomized or nonrandomized) assessing the use of aspirin on preeclampsia prevention among high-risk women for this phenomenon were included. Three authors independently surfed the databases and selected the studies; in case of any disagreement, the problem was resolved by the fourth author. Then, the papers were fully screened and those that met the study criteria were individually evaluated. The revised JBI critical appraisal tool for the assessment of risk of bias for randomized controlled trials was applied categorizing the studies into low-moderate and high risk of bias.
Results: Finally, data from twenty-three studies on 15,764 high-risk preeclampsia individuals with singleton pregnancies were extracted. Fourteen, 4, and 5 studies had low, moderate, and high risk of bias. Aspirin use regardless of its dosage was not remarkably associated with reduced risk of preeclampsia in the majority of studies. Besides, the time of initiation or discontinuation did not affect the outcomes. Moreover, aspirin combination with anticoagulant was not necessarily superior over aspirin alone.
Conclusion: Based on our findings, the body of evidence majorly found no remarkable role for prophylactic aspirin use to prevent preeclampsia incidence at any time during pregnancy; however, promising data, particularly in higher doses and earlier initiation of aspirin, have been noted.
背景:长期以来,人们一直认为阿司匹林可能具有降低子痫前期风险的预防作用;然而,最近的评估改变了人们对这种药物的看法。目前的定性系统评价旨在彻底评估阿司匹林治疗高危子痫前期妇女的结果。材料和方法:本研究的范围是评估:(1)阿司匹林治疗对高危妊娠子痫前期的预防作用;(2)应用剂量对子痫前期的发生率;(3)阿司匹林单独使用与抗凝剂联合使用的结果;(4)阿司匹林停药对子痫前期发生率的影响。检索了2015年1月1日至2023年12月31日的PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science和Embase数据库。用英语撰写的研究(随机或非随机)评估阿司匹林在高危妇女中预防子痫前期的使用。三位作者独立地浏览数据库并选择研究;如有异议,由第四作者解决。然后,对论文进行全面筛选,对符合研究标准的论文进行单独评估。应用修订后的JBI关键评价工具对随机对照试验进行偏倚风险评估,将研究分为低、中、高风险偏倚。结果:最后,从23项研究中提取了15,764例单胎妊娠高危子痫前期患者的数据。14项、4项和5项研究的偏倚风险分别为低、中、高。在大多数研究中,无论剂量如何,阿司匹林的使用与降低先兆子痫的风险并没有显著的联系。此外,开始或停止的时间不影响结果。此外,阿司匹林联合抗凝剂并不一定优于阿司匹林单独使用。结论:根据我们的研究结果,大量的证据表明,在妊娠期间的任何时候预防性使用阿司匹林对预防子痫前期的发生没有显著的作用;然而,已经注意到有希望的数据,特别是在更高剂量和更早开始服用阿司匹林方面。
期刊介绍:
Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, a publication of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, is a peer-reviewed online continuous journal with print on demand compilation of issues published. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.jmsjournal.net. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository.