Mohamed Nazar Abdalla, Amani Osman, Nazar Mahmoud, Sarah C Harney, Mohamed Elhassan Abdalla
{"title":"Social Accountability in Clinical Education: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Mohamed Nazar Abdalla, Amani Osman, Nazar Mahmoud, Sarah C Harney, Mohamed Elhassan Abdalla","doi":"10.2147/AMEP.S550053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Clinical education serves as a vital bridge between theoretical knowledge and practical application, preparing healthcare professionals to meet societal health needs. Social accountability, as defined by the World Health Organization, obliges educational institutions to align education, research, and service activities with community health priorities. Although widely recognized, the integration of social accountability into clinical education remains underexplored, with notable gaps in evaluation, curriculum alignment, and implementation strategies. This scoping review's purpose is to bridge the existing knowledge gap by synthesizing current evidence, analysing various implementation methods, identifying barriers and evaluation frameworks, and outlining opportunities for advancing socially accountable clinical training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This scoping review synthesizes current evidence on embedding social accountability within clinical education. Guided by the Population-Concept-Context (PCC) framework, the review asked: How is social accountability integrated into clinical education for healthcare professionals, students, and educators across clinical training settings? Studies involving healthcare students, professionals, and educators in hospitals, community clinics, and rural placements were included. A comprehensive search of six databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and ERIC) was conducted from inception up to February 28, 2025. Only English-language publications were included. Data extraction followed Joanna Briggs Institute and PRISMA-ScR guidelines, with thematic analysis conducted using Braun and Clarke's approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 893 identified records, 58 studies met the inclusion criteria. Key themes emerged, including curricular integration, faculty engagement, barriers to implementation, community engagement, practical applications, Educational Outcomes and evaluation strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Integrating social accountability into clinical education promotes equity in healthcare and prepares graduates to address systemic health challenges. However, persistent obstacles related to implementation and assessment remain. Future research should focus on identifying effective strategies for integrating social accountability into clinical training, considering diverse regional and cultural contexts, and exploring innovative approaches to evaluation and stakeholder collaboration.</p>","PeriodicalId":47404,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","volume":"16 ","pages":"1897-1916"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12539425/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S550053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and purpose: Clinical education serves as a vital bridge between theoretical knowledge and practical application, preparing healthcare professionals to meet societal health needs. Social accountability, as defined by the World Health Organization, obliges educational institutions to align education, research, and service activities with community health priorities. Although widely recognized, the integration of social accountability into clinical education remains underexplored, with notable gaps in evaluation, curriculum alignment, and implementation strategies. This scoping review's purpose is to bridge the existing knowledge gap by synthesizing current evidence, analysing various implementation methods, identifying barriers and evaluation frameworks, and outlining opportunities for advancing socially accountable clinical training.
Methods: This scoping review synthesizes current evidence on embedding social accountability within clinical education. Guided by the Population-Concept-Context (PCC) framework, the review asked: How is social accountability integrated into clinical education for healthcare professionals, students, and educators across clinical training settings? Studies involving healthcare students, professionals, and educators in hospitals, community clinics, and rural placements were included. A comprehensive search of six databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and ERIC) was conducted from inception up to February 28, 2025. Only English-language publications were included. Data extraction followed Joanna Briggs Institute and PRISMA-ScR guidelines, with thematic analysis conducted using Braun and Clarke's approach.
Results: From 893 identified records, 58 studies met the inclusion criteria. Key themes emerged, including curricular integration, faculty engagement, barriers to implementation, community engagement, practical applications, Educational Outcomes and evaluation strategies.
Conclusion: Integrating social accountability into clinical education promotes equity in healthcare and prepares graduates to address systemic health challenges. However, persistent obstacles related to implementation and assessment remain. Future research should focus on identifying effective strategies for integrating social accountability into clinical training, considering diverse regional and cultural contexts, and exploring innovative approaches to evaluation and stakeholder collaboration.
背景和目的:临床教育是理论知识和实际应用之间的重要桥梁,使医疗保健专业人员能够满足社会健康需求。根据世界卫生组织的定义,社会责任要求教育机构将教育、研究和服务活动与社区卫生优先事项结合起来。虽然得到广泛认可,但社会责任融入临床教育的探索仍然不足,在评估、课程调整和实施策略方面存在显著差距。本次范围审查的目的是通过综合现有证据,分析各种实施方法,识别障碍和评估框架,以及概述促进对社会负责的临床培训的机会,弥合现有的知识差距。方法:该范围综述综合了目前在临床教育中嵌入社会责任的证据。在人口-概念-环境(PCC)框架的指导下,该综述提出了以下问题:如何将社会责任整合到临床培训环境中的医疗保健专业人员、学生和教育工作者的临床教育中?包括医院、社区诊所和农村实习的卫生保健学生、专业人员和教育工作者的研究。我们对六个数据库(PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, PsycINFO和ERIC)进行了全面的检索,从成立到2025年2月28日。只包括英文出版物。数据提取遵循乔安娜布里格斯研究所和PRISMA-ScR的指导方针,并使用布劳恩和克拉克的方法进行主题分析。结果:在893份确定的记录中,58项研究符合纳入标准。关键主题包括课程整合、教师参与、实施障碍、社区参与、实际应用、教育成果和评估策略。结论:将社会责任纳入临床教育促进医疗公平,并为毕业生应对系统性健康挑战做好准备。然而,与执行和评估有关的持续障碍仍然存在。未来的研究应侧重于确定将社会责任纳入临床培训的有效策略,考虑不同的区域和文化背景,并探索评估和利益相关者合作的创新方法。