Time for change - Do we need a women's quota in vascular surgery to counteract the gender gap?

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Ursula E M Werra, Karin Pfister, Benjamin Rosswinkel, Livia Cotta, Julia Härtl, Wilma Schierling, Barbara Rantner, Carola M Hoffmann-Wieker
{"title":"Time for change - Do we need a women's quota in vascular surgery to counteract the gender gap?","authors":"Ursula E M Werra, Karin Pfister, Benjamin Rosswinkel, Livia Cotta, Julia Härtl, Wilma Schierling, Barbara Rantner, Carola M Hoffmann-Wieker","doi":"10.1024/0301-1526/a001245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> Over the last years, the discussion about gender equality has reached surgery. Among all the different aspects being discussed, the question of the necessity of implementing a women's quota arises regularly. <i>Materials and methods:</i> In 2022 a questionnaire was answered by members of the German Society for Vascular Surgery and Vascular Medicine. Relevant career and family-life related demographic aspects as well as their personal opinion on the need for a women's quota were evaluated. <i>Results:</i> 540 vascular surgeons participated in the survey. Significantly more male surgeons were in a committed relationship. Significantly more partners of female colleagues had full-time jobs, and significantly less women stated that they were the main earners in the relationship. Male surgeons had significantly more children. In general, men held higher positions and significantly more male surgeons were enrolled as head of department. Significantly more women favoured a women's quota for e.g. head of department positions, senior surgeon positions, scientific committees and scientific panels at scientific conferences. Regarding the level of such a quota, 43% of participating female surgeons and 19.5% of males suggested a 50% quota, whereas 59% of male and 30% of female surgeons did not see the need of a women's quota at all. <i>Conclusions:</i> The present survey shows the imbalance between men and women in vascular surgery in Germany in terms of career development and family life. Persistent disadvantages for women were shown. Women's quotas could be helpful, but are certainly no reasonable \"stand-alone-approach\": a general change of mindset is needed here.</p>","PeriodicalId":23528,"journal":{"name":"Vasa-european Journal of Vascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"355-362"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vasa-european Journal of Vascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1024/0301-1526/a001245","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Over the last years, the discussion about gender equality has reached surgery. Among all the different aspects being discussed, the question of the necessity of implementing a women's quota arises regularly. Materials and methods: In 2022 a questionnaire was answered by members of the German Society for Vascular Surgery and Vascular Medicine. Relevant career and family-life related demographic aspects as well as their personal opinion on the need for a women's quota were evaluated. Results: 540 vascular surgeons participated in the survey. Significantly more male surgeons were in a committed relationship. Significantly more partners of female colleagues had full-time jobs, and significantly less women stated that they were the main earners in the relationship. Male surgeons had significantly more children. In general, men held higher positions and significantly more male surgeons were enrolled as head of department. Significantly more women favoured a women's quota for e.g. head of department positions, senior surgeon positions, scientific committees and scientific panels at scientific conferences. Regarding the level of such a quota, 43% of participating female surgeons and 19.5% of males suggested a 50% quota, whereas 59% of male and 30% of female surgeons did not see the need of a women's quota at all. Conclusions: The present survey shows the imbalance between men and women in vascular surgery in Germany in terms of career development and family life. Persistent disadvantages for women were shown. Women's quotas could be helpful, but are certainly no reasonable "stand-alone-approach": a general change of mindset is needed here.

是时候改变了——我们是否需要在血管手术中设置女性配额来抵消性别差距?
背景:在过去的几年里,关于性别平等的讨论已经涉及到外科手术。在讨论的所有不同方面中,经常出现执行妇女配额的必要性的问题。材料和方法:2022年,德国血管外科和血管医学学会的成员回答了一份问卷。评价了与职业和家庭生活有关的人口方面以及他们对需要妇女配额的个人意见。结果:540名血管外科医生参与了调查。明显更多的男性外科医生处于稳定的关系中。女性同事的伴侣中有全职工作的明显增多,而认为自己是关系中主要挣钱者的女性明显减少。男性外科医生的孩子明显更多。一般来说,男性的职位更高,更多的男性外科医生被录取为科室主任。更多的妇女赞成在诸如部门主任职位、高级外科医生职位、科学委员会和科学会议的科学小组中设立妇女名额。至于该配额的水平,43%的受访女外科医生及19.5%的受访男外科医生建议设立50%的配额,而59%的受访男外科医生及30%的受访女外科医生则认为根本不需要设立女性配额。结论:本调查显示德国血管外科在职业发展和家庭生活方面存在男女不平衡。妇女长期处于不利地位。女性配额可能会有所帮助,但肯定不是合理的“独立方法”:这里需要普遍改变思维方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
61
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Vasa is the European journal of vascular medicine. It is the official organ of the German, Swiss, and Slovenian Societies of Angiology. The journal publishes original research articles, case reports and reviews on vascular biology, epidemiology, prevention, diagnosis, medical treatment and interventions for diseases of the arterial circulation, in the field of phlebology and lymphology including the microcirculation, except the cardiac circulation. Vasa combines basic science with clinical medicine making it relevant to all physicians interested in the whole vascular field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书