Middle meningeal artery infusion for headaches after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a pilot study.

IF 4.3 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING
Tongyu Zhang, Matias Luis Costa, Magdy Selim, Tao Hong, Peter Kan
{"title":"Middle meningeal artery infusion for headaches after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a pilot study.","authors":"Tongyu Zhang, Matias Luis Costa, Magdy Selim, Tao Hong, Peter Kan","doi":"10.1136/jnis-2025-024125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Headache is a common and disabling symptom after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH), often requiring high-dose opioids. Meningeal inflammation and dural nociceptor activation may contribute. The middle meningeal artery (MMA), which supplies the dura, offers a route for targeted therapy.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether dural infusion of lidocaine±dexamethasone during aneurysm embolization reduces pain and opioid use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between February and June 2025, nine patients with aSAH (Hunt and Hess grade 1-2 with Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score ≥7 were prospectively assigned to: (1) lidocaine+dexamethasone (L+D, n=3), (2) lidocaine only (L, n=3), or (3) no infusion (Control, n=3). MMA infusion was performed during embolization using a standard microcatheter technique. VAS was recorded at baseline, immediately postoperatively, 4-24 hours, 7 days, and 1 month. Primary outcomes were pain reduction and opioid use (oral morphine equivalents, OME). Statistical comparisons used non-parametric tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postoperative median VAS fell from 7.0 to 6.0 in Controls (14%), 8.0 to 2.0 in L+D (75%), 8.0 to 4.0 in L (50%) (pooled P=0.016). First-day pain burden: 31 (Control), 9 (L+D), 21 (L), 15 (pooled; P=0.012). Early subacute burden: 9 (Control), 5 (L+D), 7 (L), 6 (pooled; P=0.024). Late subacute: 6 (Control), 3 (L+D), 5 (L), 4 (pooled; P=0.029). Cumulative burden: 42 (Control), 16 (L+D), 30 (L), 23 (pooled; P=0.012). Median OME: 16.7 mg (Control), 5.6 mg (L+D), 0 mg (L), 2.8 mg (pooled). There were no complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MMA infusion appears safe and may provide sustained, opioid-sparing pain relief after aSAH. Larger studies are needed to confirm efficacy and to optimize protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":16411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2025-024125","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Headache is a common and disabling symptom after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH), often requiring high-dose opioids. Meningeal inflammation and dural nociceptor activation may contribute. The middle meningeal artery (MMA), which supplies the dura, offers a route for targeted therapy.

Objective: To evaluate whether dural infusion of lidocaine±dexamethasone during aneurysm embolization reduces pain and opioid use.

Methods: Between February and June 2025, nine patients with aSAH (Hunt and Hess grade 1-2 with Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score ≥7 were prospectively assigned to: (1) lidocaine+dexamethasone (L+D, n=3), (2) lidocaine only (L, n=3), or (3) no infusion (Control, n=3). MMA infusion was performed during embolization using a standard microcatheter technique. VAS was recorded at baseline, immediately postoperatively, 4-24 hours, 7 days, and 1 month. Primary outcomes were pain reduction and opioid use (oral morphine equivalents, OME). Statistical comparisons used non-parametric tests.

Results: Postoperative median VAS fell from 7.0 to 6.0 in Controls (14%), 8.0 to 2.0 in L+D (75%), 8.0 to 4.0 in L (50%) (pooled P=0.016). First-day pain burden: 31 (Control), 9 (L+D), 21 (L), 15 (pooled; P=0.012). Early subacute burden: 9 (Control), 5 (L+D), 7 (L), 6 (pooled; P=0.024). Late subacute: 6 (Control), 3 (L+D), 5 (L), 4 (pooled; P=0.029). Cumulative burden: 42 (Control), 16 (L+D), 30 (L), 23 (pooled; P=0.012). Median OME: 16.7 mg (Control), 5.6 mg (L+D), 0 mg (L), 2.8 mg (pooled). There were no complications.

Conclusion: MMA infusion appears safe and may provide sustained, opioid-sparing pain relief after aSAH. Larger studies are needed to confirm efficacy and to optimize protocols.

脑膜中动脉灌注治疗动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血后头痛:一项初步研究。
头痛是动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(aSAH)后常见的致残症状,通常需要大剂量阿片类药物。脑膜炎症和硬脑膜伤害感受器激活可能起作用。脑膜中动脉(MMA)供应硬脑膜,为靶向治疗提供了一条途径。目的:评价动脉瘤栓塞术中硬膜输注利多卡因±地塞米松是否能减少疼痛和阿片类药物的使用。方法:在2025年2月至6月期间,9例aSAH患者(Hunt and Hess分级1-2级,视觉模拟量表评分≥7)被前瞻性分配到:(1)利多卡因+地塞米松(L+D, n=3),(2)仅利多卡因(L, n=3)或(3)不输注(对照组,n=3)。在栓塞期间使用标准微导管技术进行MMA输注。VAS分别于基线、术后即刻、4-24小时、7天、1个月进行记录。主要结局是疼痛减轻和阿片类药物使用(口服吗啡当量,OME)。统计比较采用非参数检验。结果:对照组术后中位VAS从7.0降至6.0 (14%),L+D组从8.0降至2.0 (75%),L组从8.0降至4.0 (50%)(P=0.016)。第一天疼痛负担:31例(对照组),9例(L+D), 21例(L), 15例(合并;P=0.012)。早期亚急性负担:9例(对照组),5例(L+D), 7例(L), 6例(合并;P=0.024)。晚期亚急性:6例(对照组),3例(L+D), 5例(L), 4例(合并;P=0.029)。累积负担:42例(对照组),16例(L+D), 30例(L), 23例(合并组;P=0.012)。中位OME: 16.7 mg(对照组),5.6 mg (L+D), 0 mg (L), 2.8 mg(合并组)。没有并发症。结论:MMA输注似乎是安全的,并且可以在aSAH后提供持续的,不使用阿片类药物的疼痛缓解。需要更大规模的研究来确认疗效并优化方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
14.60%
发文量
291
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery (JNIS) is a leading peer review journal for scientific research and literature pertaining to the field of neurointerventional surgery. The journal launch follows growing professional interest in neurointerventional techniques for the treatment of a range of neurological and vascular problems including stroke, aneurysms, brain tumors, and spinal compression.The journal is owned by SNIS and is also the official journal of the Interventional Chapter of the Australian and New Zealand Society of Neuroradiology (ANZSNR), the Canadian Interventional Neuro Group, the Hong Kong Neurological Society (HKNS) and the Neuroradiological Society of Taiwan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信