Comparison of Cardiac Events and Survival Between Asymptomatic Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients: Coronary CT Study.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Jin Young Yoo, Se Ri Kang, Yun Jung Bae, Eun Ju Chun
{"title":"Comparison of Cardiac Events and Survival Between Asymptomatic Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients: Coronary CT Study.","authors":"Jin Young Yoo, Se Ri Kang, Yun Jung Bae, Eun Ju Chun","doi":"10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is useful for risk stratification in patients with diabetes, limited data is available regarding its prognostic value in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DMs). Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the utility of CCTA in coronary artery disease (CAD) risk stratification in T2DMs compared to that in patients without diabetes mellitus (non-DMs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We selected 565 T2DMs and 1,130 non-DMs using propensity score matching from the Evaluation of Subclinical Coronary atherosclerosis for Risk Stratification Using the Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (ESCORT) study of 5,142 asymptomatic individuals. We evaluated CCTA findings and confirmed the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE; cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and unstable angina) and total cardiac events (TCE; MACE plus coronary revascularization) during follow-up using Cox proportional hazards analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a median follow-up of 47 months, MACE and TCE occurred significantly more in T2DMs than in non-DMs (4.2% vs. 1.7% and 7.8% vs. 4.3%, respectively, all <i>P</i> < 0.001). The Cox regression model identified T2DMs, obstructive stenosis, and proximally located plaques as independent predictors of MACE and TCE (all <i>P</i> < 0.05). Kaplan-Meier curve analysis revealed that survival rate was dependent on stenosis grade (log-rank <i>P</i> < 0.001) and differed significantly in the presence of T2DMs among patients with obstructive stenosis (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While diabetes is an independent risk factor for CAD, its impact on survival rate varies with the severity of CAD, highlighting the value of CCTA as a prognostic tool for CAD risk stratification in asymptomatic T2DMs.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01416532.</p>","PeriodicalId":16249,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Medical Science","volume":"40 40","pages":"e251"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12540969/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e251","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is useful for risk stratification in patients with diabetes, limited data is available regarding its prognostic value in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DMs). Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the utility of CCTA in coronary artery disease (CAD) risk stratification in T2DMs compared to that in patients without diabetes mellitus (non-DMs).

Methods: We selected 565 T2DMs and 1,130 non-DMs using propensity score matching from the Evaluation of Subclinical Coronary atherosclerosis for Risk Stratification Using the Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (ESCORT) study of 5,142 asymptomatic individuals. We evaluated CCTA findings and confirmed the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE; cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and unstable angina) and total cardiac events (TCE; MACE plus coronary revascularization) during follow-up using Cox proportional hazards analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival curves.

Results: Over a median follow-up of 47 months, MACE and TCE occurred significantly more in T2DMs than in non-DMs (4.2% vs. 1.7% and 7.8% vs. 4.3%, respectively, all P < 0.001). The Cox regression model identified T2DMs, obstructive stenosis, and proximally located plaques as independent predictors of MACE and TCE (all P < 0.05). Kaplan-Meier curve analysis revealed that survival rate was dependent on stenosis grade (log-rank P < 0.001) and differed significantly in the presence of T2DMs among patients with obstructive stenosis (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: While diabetes is an independent risk factor for CAD, its impact on survival rate varies with the severity of CAD, highlighting the value of CCTA as a prognostic tool for CAD risk stratification in asymptomatic T2DMs.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01416532.

无症状糖尿病和非糖尿病患者心脏事件和生存的比较:冠状动脉CT研究。
背景:尽管冠状动脉ct血管造影(CCTA)对糖尿病患者的风险分层很有用,但关于其在无症状2型糖尿病(t2dm)患者中的预后价值的数据有限。因此,我们的目的是评估CCTA在t2dm患者冠状动脉疾病(CAD)危险分层中的应用,并将其与非dm患者进行比较。方法:利用冠状动脉ct血管造影(ESCORT)研究,我们从亚临床冠状动脉粥样硬化评估中选择565名t2dm患者和1130名非dm患者进行风险分层,共5142名无症状个体。我们评估了CCTA结果,并利用Cox比例风险分析和Kaplan-Meier生存曲线确认了随访期间主要不良心脏事件(MACE;心源性死亡、非致死性心肌梗死和不稳定型心绞痛)和总心脏事件(TCE; MACE +冠状动脉血运重建术)的发生。结果:在47个月的中位随访中,t2dm患者的MACE和TCE发生率明显高于非dm患者(分别为4.2%对1.7%和7.8%对4.3%,均P < 0.001)。Cox回归模型发现t2dm、阻塞性狭窄和近端斑块是MACE和TCE的独立预测因子(均P < 0.05)。Kaplan-Meier曲线分析显示,生存率与狭窄等级有关(log-rank P < 0.001),梗阻性狭窄患者存在t2dm的生存率差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:虽然糖尿病是CAD的独立危险因素,但其对生存率的影响随CAD严重程度的不同而不同,这突出了CCTA作为无症状t2dm患者CAD风险分层的预后工具的价值。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT01416532。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Korean Medical Science
Journal of Korean Medical Science 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.90%
发文量
320
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Korean Medical Science (JKMS) is an international, peer-reviewed Open Access journal of medicine published weekly in English. The Journal’s publisher is the Korean Academy of Medical Sciences (KAMS), Korean Medical Association (KMA). JKMS aims to publish evidence-based, scientific research articles from various disciplines of the medical sciences. The Journal welcomes articles of general interest to medical researchers especially when they contain original information. Articles on the clinical evaluation of drugs and other therapies, epidemiologic studies of the general population, studies on pathogenic organisms and toxic materials, and the toxicities and adverse effects of therapeutics are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信