The impact of warm-up intensity and duration on maximal effort limited cardiopulmonary exercise testing parameters in healthy young adults.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 PHYSIOLOGY
Bastien Pedrosa, Chantal Daucourt, Vincent Gremeaux, Brian D Duscha, Brian J Coyne, William E Kraus, Davide Malatesta, Fabio Borrani, Aaron L Baggish, Daria Neyroud
{"title":"The impact of warm-up intensity and duration on maximal effort limited cardiopulmonary exercise testing parameters in healthy young adults.","authors":"Bastien Pedrosa, Chantal Daucourt, Vincent Gremeaux, Brian D Duscha, Brian J Coyne, William E Kraus, Davide Malatesta, Fabio Borrani, Aaron L Baggish, Daria Neyroud","doi":"10.1152/japplphysiol.00774.2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The impact of warm-up protocols on peak oxygen uptake (V̇O<sub>2-PEAK</sub>) during cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) remains unclear. This study investigated the effect of warm-ups of different durations and intensities on V̇O<sub>2-PEAK</sub> in healthy young adults during maximal-effort CPET cycle ergometry. Recreationally active participants (10 males, 4 females; 27 ± 4 years) performed five CPETs, each preceded by one of five randomized conditions: (i) no warm-up (NWU), (ii) short duration / low intensity (SD/LI) warm-up (5 min at 0.5 W/kg), (iii) long duration / low intensity (LD/LI) warm-up (10 min at 0.5 W/kg), (iv) short duration / moderate intensity (SD/MI) warm-up (5 min at 1 W/kg), and (v) a long duration / moderate intensity (LD/MI) warm-up (10 min at 1 W/kg). No significant differences were found in V̇O<sub>2-PEAK</sub>, peak heart rate, maximal or submaximal power output across the different warm-up protocols (p > 0.05 for all comparisons), except for greater absolute HR and power output observed at the first ventilatory threshold (VT1) following SD/MI <i>vs.</i> NWU (p < 0.05). Participant ratings of warm-up protocols indicated a preference for shorter and/or lower-intensity warm-ups. Among healthy young adults, the inclusion of warm-up exercise prior to CPET has no significant effects on maximal exercise parameters. These findings question the necessity of warm-up prior to CPET and provide flexibility in CPET warm-up protocol selection in this population. Recapitulation of this study in alternative clinical and scientific populations is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":15160,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied physiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00774.2025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The impact of warm-up protocols on peak oxygen uptake (V̇O2-PEAK) during cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) remains unclear. This study investigated the effect of warm-ups of different durations and intensities on V̇O2-PEAK in healthy young adults during maximal-effort CPET cycle ergometry. Recreationally active participants (10 males, 4 females; 27 ± 4 years) performed five CPETs, each preceded by one of five randomized conditions: (i) no warm-up (NWU), (ii) short duration / low intensity (SD/LI) warm-up (5 min at 0.5 W/kg), (iii) long duration / low intensity (LD/LI) warm-up (10 min at 0.5 W/kg), (iv) short duration / moderate intensity (SD/MI) warm-up (5 min at 1 W/kg), and (v) a long duration / moderate intensity (LD/MI) warm-up (10 min at 1 W/kg). No significant differences were found in V̇O2-PEAK, peak heart rate, maximal or submaximal power output across the different warm-up protocols (p > 0.05 for all comparisons), except for greater absolute HR and power output observed at the first ventilatory threshold (VT1) following SD/MI vs. NWU (p < 0.05). Participant ratings of warm-up protocols indicated a preference for shorter and/or lower-intensity warm-ups. Among healthy young adults, the inclusion of warm-up exercise prior to CPET has no significant effects on maximal exercise parameters. These findings question the necessity of warm-up prior to CPET and provide flexibility in CPET warm-up protocol selection in this population. Recapitulation of this study in alternative clinical and scientific populations is warranted.

热身强度和持续时间对健康青年最大努力极限心肺运动测试参数的影响。
在心肺运动试验(CPET)中,热身方案对峰值摄氧量(vo2 - peak)的影响尚不清楚。本研究探讨了不同时间和强度的热身运动对健康青壮年CPET大运动量运动中vo2 - peak的影响。娱乐活动参与者(10个男性,4女性;27±4年)五CPETs执行,每个之前的五个随机条件:(i)没有热身(NWU),(2)短期/低强度(SD /李)热身(5分钟0.5 W / kg),(3)长时间/低强度(LD /李)热身在0.5 W / kg(10分钟),(iv)短期/中等强度(SD / MI)热身(5分钟1 W /公斤),和(v)很长时间/中等强度(LD / MI)热身(10分钟1 W /公斤)。在不同的热身方案中,除了SD/MI与NWU在第一次通气阈值(VT1)时观察到的绝对HR和功率输出更高(p < 0.05)外,在V / O2-PEAK、峰值心率、最大或次最大功率输出方面没有发现显著差异(所有比较p < 0.05)。参与者对热身方案的评分表明,他们更喜欢短时间和/或低强度的热身。在健康的年轻人中,在CPET之前加入热身运动对最大运动参数没有显著影响。这些发现质疑了CPET前热身的必要性,并为该人群选择CPET热身方案提供了灵活性。在其他临床和科学人群中重述这项研究是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
296
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Physiology publishes the highest quality original research and reviews that examine novel adaptive and integrative physiological mechanisms in humans and animals that advance the field. The journal encourages the submission of manuscripts that examine the acute and adaptive responses of various organs, tissues, cells and/or molecular pathways to environmental, physiological and/or pathophysiological stressors. As an applied physiology journal, topics of interest are not limited to a particular organ system. The journal, therefore, considers a wide array of integrative and translational research topics examining the mechanisms involved in disease processes and mitigation strategies, as well as the promotion of health and well-being throughout the lifespan. Priority is given to manuscripts that provide mechanistic insight deemed to exert an impact on the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信