Domain-Specific Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in Older Adults With Mobility Disability Risk Residing in a Continuing Care Retirement Community: A Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 2 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Journal of Aging Research Pub Date : 2025-10-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/jare/7436862
Jemimah O Bakare, Soyoung Choi, Susan Aguiñaga, Ziyue Wang, Emerson Sebastião
{"title":"Domain-Specific Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in Older Adults With Mobility Disability Risk Residing in a Continuing Care Retirement Community: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Jemimah O Bakare, Soyoung Choi, Susan Aguiñaga, Ziyue Wang, Emerson Sebastião","doi":"10.1155/jare/7436862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study investigated domain-specific physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB) among older adults living in a Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC) as a function of risk of mobility disability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Secondary cross-sectional data from 100 older CCRC residents were analyzed. The short physical performance battery (SPPB) assessed mobility disability risk, and PA and SB were self-reported. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> test, and Quade's nonparametric ANOVA, with significance set at <i>p</i> < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-nine participants had an SPPB score < 10, indicating high mobility disability risk, while 41 had a score ≥ 10, indicating low risk. The low-risk group had higher total PA (67.1 ± 41.8 vs. 49.2 ± 40.5, <i>p</i>=0.012) and leisure PA (30.5 ± 25.1 vs. 21.2 ± 23.5, <i>p</i>=0.035) minutes, and higher total sedentary minutes (645.8 ± 209.6 vs. 567.0 ± 290.8, <i>p</i>=0.007) and non-screen sedentary minutes (447.1 ± 182.7 vs. 350.0 ± 164.8, <i>p</i>=0.002) than the high risk group. After controlling for age, perceived health, and assistive device use, the differences between groups were no longer significant (<i>p</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Despite nonsignificant adjusted differences, our findings indicate overall low PA and high SB in the study participants. Given the well-documented benefits of PA, targeted interventions are needed to increase PA and reduce SB in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":14933,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging Research","volume":"2025 ","pages":"7436862"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12537186/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/jare/7436862","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study investigated domain-specific physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB) among older adults living in a Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC) as a function of risk of mobility disability.

Methods: Secondary cross-sectional data from 100 older CCRC residents were analyzed. The short physical performance battery (SPPB) assessed mobility disability risk, and PA and SB were self-reported. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Mann-Whitney U test, and Quade's nonparametric ANOVA, with significance set at p < 0.05.

Results: Fifty-nine participants had an SPPB score < 10, indicating high mobility disability risk, while 41 had a score ≥ 10, indicating low risk. The low-risk group had higher total PA (67.1 ± 41.8 vs. 49.2 ± 40.5, p=0.012) and leisure PA (30.5 ± 25.1 vs. 21.2 ± 23.5, p=0.035) minutes, and higher total sedentary minutes (645.8 ± 209.6 vs. 567.0 ± 290.8, p=0.007) and non-screen sedentary minutes (447.1 ± 182.7 vs. 350.0 ± 164.8, p=0.002) than the high risk group. After controlling for age, perceived health, and assistive device use, the differences between groups were no longer significant (p > 0.05).

Discussion: Despite nonsignificant adjusted differences, our findings indicate overall low PA and high SB in the study participants. Given the well-documented benefits of PA, targeted interventions are needed to increase PA and reduce SB in this population.

居住在持续护理退休社区中有行动障碍风险的老年人的特定领域身体活动和久坐行为:一项横断面研究。
摘要:本研究调查了生活在持续护理退休社区(CCRC)的老年人特定领域的身体活动(PA)和久坐行为(SB)对行动障碍风险的影响。方法:对100名老年CCRC居民的二次横断面资料进行分析。短物理性能电池(SPPB)评估行动障碍风险,PA和SB自报。数据分析采用描述性统计、Mann-Whitney U检验和Quade非参数方差分析,显著性设置为p < 0.05。结果:59例患者SPPB评分< 10分,为高活动障碍风险;41例患者SPPB评分≥10分,为低活动障碍风险。低风险组总PA(67.1±41.8比49.2±40.5,p=0.012)和休闲PA(30.5±25.1比21.2±23.5,p=0.035)分钟,总久坐时间(645.8±209.6比567.0±290.8,p=0.007)和非屏幕久坐时间(447.1±182.7比350.0±164.8,p=0.002)高于高风险组。在控制了年龄、感知健康和辅助器具使用后,组间差异不再显著(p < 0.05)。讨论:尽管调整后的差异不显著,但我们的研究结果表明,研究参与者的总体PA低,SB高。鉴于PA的益处有充分的证据,需要有针对性的干预措施来增加PA并降低这一人群的SB。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Aging Research
Journal of Aging Research Medicine-Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书