Kinematic Comparison of Throw-Down Mechanics Between Baseball and Softball Catchers.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Ryan Zappa, Anthony Fava, Billy Lozowski, Ethan Kohler, Gretchen D Oliver
{"title":"Kinematic Comparison of Throw-Down Mechanics Between Baseball and Softball Catchers.","authors":"Ryan Zappa, Anthony Fava, Billy Lozowski, Ethan Kohler, Gretchen D Oliver","doi":"10.1055/a-2707-5229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Based on previous research, catchers' throwing mechanics between baseball and softball tend to be viewed as comparable despite the inherent differences in playing conditions. When compared at key throwing timepoints, differences in pelvis and trunk kinematics were observed between sports. However, it is uncertain whether throwing-arm mechanics would differ throughout the throw between these athletic populations. Therefore, this study aimed to compare catchers' throwing mechanics between sports using continuous statistical analyses. A total of 20 catchers (baseball: <i>n</i>=10 and softball: <i>n</i>=10) participated in this study. Statistical parametric independent samples <i>t</i>-tests (<i>α</i>=0.05) were used to temporally compare proximal and throwing-arm kinematics from foot contact (0%) to maximum shoulder internal rotation (100%) between sports. Differences found included elbow flexion (<i>p</i>=0.008; 0-13 and 99-100%), shoulder rotation (<i>p</i><0.001; 23-53%), elevation (<i>p</i><0.001; 0-95%) and the plane of elevation (<i>p</i><0.001; 0-100%), pelvis and trunk lateral flexion (pelvis: <i>p</i>=0.027; 0-30% and trunk: <i>p</i><0.001; 23-100%) and rotation (pelvis: <i>p</i>=0.036; 4-21% and trunk: <i>p</i>=0.036; 84-100%), and trunk flexion (<i>p</i><0.001; 34-100%). While most of the observed differences were brief, notable differences in the trunk flexion, trunk lateral flexion, shoulder elevation, and plane of elevation were apparent for much of the throwing motion. Time-series analyses identified distinct mechanics involved in baseball and softball throw downs, lending support for sport-specific biomechanical assessments on catchers.</p>","PeriodicalId":14439,"journal":{"name":"International journal of sports medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of sports medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2707-5229","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Based on previous research, catchers' throwing mechanics between baseball and softball tend to be viewed as comparable despite the inherent differences in playing conditions. When compared at key throwing timepoints, differences in pelvis and trunk kinematics were observed between sports. However, it is uncertain whether throwing-arm mechanics would differ throughout the throw between these athletic populations. Therefore, this study aimed to compare catchers' throwing mechanics between sports using continuous statistical analyses. A total of 20 catchers (baseball: n=10 and softball: n=10) participated in this study. Statistical parametric independent samples t-tests (α=0.05) were used to temporally compare proximal and throwing-arm kinematics from foot contact (0%) to maximum shoulder internal rotation (100%) between sports. Differences found included elbow flexion (p=0.008; 0-13 and 99-100%), shoulder rotation (p<0.001; 23-53%), elevation (p<0.001; 0-95%) and the plane of elevation (p<0.001; 0-100%), pelvis and trunk lateral flexion (pelvis: p=0.027; 0-30% and trunk: p<0.001; 23-100%) and rotation (pelvis: p=0.036; 4-21% and trunk: p=0.036; 84-100%), and trunk flexion (p<0.001; 34-100%). While most of the observed differences were brief, notable differences in the trunk flexion, trunk lateral flexion, shoulder elevation, and plane of elevation were apparent for much of the throwing motion. Time-series analyses identified distinct mechanics involved in baseball and softball throw downs, lending support for sport-specific biomechanical assessments on catchers.

棒球和垒球接球手抛球力学的运动学比较。
根据之前的研究,棒球和垒球之间的接球手的投掷机制往往被视为可比性,尽管在比赛条件上存在内在差异。当在关键投掷时间点进行比较时,观察到运动之间骨盆和躯干运动学的差异。然而,在这些运动人群中,投掷臂的力学是否会在整个投掷过程中有所不同还不确定。因此,本研究旨在利用连续的统计分析来比较不同运动中接球手的投掷力学。共有20名接球手(棒球:n=10,垒球:n=10)参与了这项研究。统计参数独立样本t检验(α=0.05)用于比较运动之间从足部接触(0%)到最大肩部内旋(100%)的近端和投掷臂运动学。发现的差异包括肘关节屈曲(p=0.008; 0-13和99-100%),肩关节旋转(pppp=0.027; 0-30%和躯干:pp=0.036; 4-21%和躯干:p=0.036; 84-100%)和躯干屈曲(p= 0.05)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
111
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The IJSM provides a forum for the publication of papers dealing with both basic and applied information that advance the field of sports medicine and exercise science, and offer a better understanding of biomedicine. The journal publishes original papers, reviews, short communications, and letters to the Editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信