An inadequate number of first-line chemotherapy cycles provides poor survival outcomes in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma receiving avelumab maintenance: results from the chu-shikoku Japan urological consortium.
{"title":"An inadequate number of first-line chemotherapy cycles provides poor survival outcomes in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma receiving avelumab maintenance: results from the chu-shikoku Japan urological consortium.","authors":"Satoshi Katayama, Takehiro Iwata, Shingo Nishimura, Kensuke Bekku, Keita Kobayashi, Nakanori Fujii, Kenichi Nishimura, Noriyoshi Miura, Yoichiro Tohi, Takuma Kato, Shinkuro Yamamoto, Hideo Fukuhara, Atsushi Takamoto, Ryutaro Shimizu, Shuichi Morizane, Yutaro Sasaki, Kei Daizumoto, Taichi Nagami, Koichiro Wada, Motoo Araki","doi":"10.1093/jjco/hyaf163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Despite 4-6 cycles of first-line chemotherapy being recommended before the initiation of avelumab maintenance treatment, a non-negligible number of patients received <4 cycles of first-line chemotherapy due to adverse events or pre-existing comorbidities. We assessed the prognostic impact of the number of first-line chemotherapy cycles in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) treated with avelumab maintenance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multi-institutional study, data were collected from patients with mUC who received avelumab maintenance treatment following first-line chemotherapy. Patients were divided into those who received <4 cycles versus ≥4 cycles of first-line chemotherapy. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analysis were used to assess the association of chemotherapy cycle numbers with overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 91 patients included in this analysis, 17 (19%) underwent <4 cycles of chemotherapy. Patients with <4 cycles of first-line chemotherapy were less likely to receive carboplatin-containing chemotherapy compared with their counterparts (6% versus 39%). On multivariable Cox regression analyses adjusted for the effects of confounding factors, receiving <4 cycles of chemotherapy was significantly associated with worse OS and CSS (HR 2.85; P = .006 and HR 3.18; P = .005, respectively), which was confirmed by subgroup analysis focusing on patients with 1-6 cycles of chemotherapy. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy use was associated with better OS over carboplatin-based chemotherapy (HR 0.41; P = .033).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An inadequate number of first-line chemotherapy cycles was associated with poor survival outcomes. Four or more cycles of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy may be beneficial to ensure the efficacy of avelumab maintenance treatment in patients with mUC.</p>","PeriodicalId":14656,"journal":{"name":"Japanese journal of clinical oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese journal of clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyaf163","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Despite 4-6 cycles of first-line chemotherapy being recommended before the initiation of avelumab maintenance treatment, a non-negligible number of patients received <4 cycles of first-line chemotherapy due to adverse events or pre-existing comorbidities. We assessed the prognostic impact of the number of first-line chemotherapy cycles in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) treated with avelumab maintenance.
Methods: In this multi-institutional study, data were collected from patients with mUC who received avelumab maintenance treatment following first-line chemotherapy. Patients were divided into those who received <4 cycles versus ≥4 cycles of first-line chemotherapy. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analysis were used to assess the association of chemotherapy cycle numbers with overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS).
Results: Of 91 patients included in this analysis, 17 (19%) underwent <4 cycles of chemotherapy. Patients with <4 cycles of first-line chemotherapy were less likely to receive carboplatin-containing chemotherapy compared with their counterparts (6% versus 39%). On multivariable Cox regression analyses adjusted for the effects of confounding factors, receiving <4 cycles of chemotherapy was significantly associated with worse OS and CSS (HR 2.85; P = .006 and HR 3.18; P = .005, respectively), which was confirmed by subgroup analysis focusing on patients with 1-6 cycles of chemotherapy. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy use was associated with better OS over carboplatin-based chemotherapy (HR 0.41; P = .033).
Conclusions: An inadequate number of first-line chemotherapy cycles was associated with poor survival outcomes. Four or more cycles of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy may be beneficial to ensure the efficacy of avelumab maintenance treatment in patients with mUC.
期刊介绍:
Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal for clinical oncologists which strives to publish high quality manuscripts addressing medical oncology, clinical trials, radiology, surgery, basic research, and palliative care. The journal aims to contribute to the world"s scientific community with special attention to the area of clinical oncology and the Asian region.
JJCO publishes various articles types including:
・Original Articles
・Case Reports
・Clinical Trial Notes
・Cancer Genetics Reports
・Epidemiology Notes
・Technical Notes
・Short Communications
・Letters to the Editors
・Solicited Reviews