Cognitive changes preceding Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective population-based studies.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience Pub Date : 2025-10-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnagi.2025.1627221
Noelia Peña Arauzo, Christoph Theyer, Florian Krismer, Atbin Djamshidian, Werner Poewe, Corinne Horlings, Beatrice Heim, Laura Zamarian, Philipp Mahlknecht
{"title":"Cognitive changes preceding Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective population-based studies.","authors":"Noelia Peña Arauzo, Christoph Theyer, Florian Krismer, Atbin Djamshidian, Werner Poewe, Corinne Horlings, Beatrice Heim, Laura Zamarian, Philipp Mahlknecht","doi":"10.3389/fnagi.2025.1627221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Various non-motor symptoms have been studied as part of the prodromal phase of Parkinson's disease (PD). However, studies assessing cognitive changes are scarce.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched PubMed and SCOPUS to identify prospective, population-based studies that reported on cognitive performance in individuals without PD at baseline, the incidence of PD at follow-up, and comparisons of cognitive performance between participants who developed PD and controls.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve studies were identified, including a total of 524,807 participants, of whom 2,939 developed PD. Four studies found differences in global cognition and a meta-analysis showed that individuals who developed PD scored 0.3 points lower than controls on the Mini-Mental State Examination at baseline. Cognitive changes were most frequently observed in tests of executive function, processing-speed and attention, and less frequently in visuospatial/visuoconstructive skills and memory. Due to the heterogeneity of the assessment methods used, it was not possible to conduct further meta-analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cognitive changes may be part of the clinical picture in prodromal PD cohorts derived from the general population. Further population-based studies with large samples and long-term follow-up are needed to better understand their extent and significance.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024547252, identifier: CRD42024547252.</p>","PeriodicalId":12450,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience","volume":"17 ","pages":"1627221"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12537721/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2025.1627221","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Various non-motor symptoms have been studied as part of the prodromal phase of Parkinson's disease (PD). However, studies assessing cognitive changes are scarce.

Methods: We systematically searched PubMed and SCOPUS to identify prospective, population-based studies that reported on cognitive performance in individuals without PD at baseline, the incidence of PD at follow-up, and comparisons of cognitive performance between participants who developed PD and controls.

Results: Twelve studies were identified, including a total of 524,807 participants, of whom 2,939 developed PD. Four studies found differences in global cognition and a meta-analysis showed that individuals who developed PD scored 0.3 points lower than controls on the Mini-Mental State Examination at baseline. Cognitive changes were most frequently observed in tests of executive function, processing-speed and attention, and less frequently in visuospatial/visuoconstructive skills and memory. Due to the heterogeneity of the assessment methods used, it was not possible to conduct further meta-analyses.

Conclusions: Cognitive changes may be part of the clinical picture in prodromal PD cohorts derived from the general population. Further population-based studies with large samples and long-term follow-up are needed to better understand their extent and significance.

Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024547252, identifier: CRD42024547252.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

帕金森病前的认知变化:前瞻性人群研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析
各种非运动症状作为帕金森氏病(PD)前驱期的一部分已被研究。然而,评估认知变化的研究很少。方法:我们系统地检索PubMed和SCOPUS,以确定前瞻性的、基于人群的研究,这些研究报告了基线时无PD个体的认知表现,随访时PD的发病率,以及PD参与者和对照组之间认知表现的比较。结果:共纳入12项研究,包括524,807名参与者,其中2,939名发展为PD。四项研究发现了全球认知的差异,一项荟萃分析显示,患有PD的个体在基线时的迷你精神状态检查得分比对照组低0.3分。在执行功能、处理速度和注意力测试中最常观察到认知变化,而在视觉空间/视觉构建技能和记忆测试中不太常见。由于所用评估方法的异质性,不可能进行进一步的meta分析。结论:认知改变可能是来自普通人群的PD前驱队列临床表现的一部分。需要进一步以大样本和长期随访的人群为基础的研究,以更好地了解其范围和意义。系统评价注册:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024547252,标识符:CRD42024547252。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
1426
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research that advances our understanding of the mechanisms of Central Nervous System aging and age-related neural diseases. Specialty Chief Editor Thomas Wisniewski at the New York University School of Medicine is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信